1015

Self-navigation using fat navigators for motion immune diffusion weighted-imaging via chemical-shift encoded multi-shot EPI
Yiming Dong1, Kirsten Koolstra2, Malte Riedel3, Matthias J.P. van Osch1, and Peter Börnert1,4
1C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Philips, Best, Netherlands, 3University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 4Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany

Synopsis

Keywords: Motion Correction, Motion Correction

The presence of fat is a challenge in diffusion-weighted EPI. Recently, chemical-shift encoded approaches found interest, as a smart way of signal averaging, doing water/fat separation and diffusion phase navigation in the reconstruction. However, the dominant signal character of fat in diffusion could actually also be exploited as an advantage by forming a shot-specific fat navigator to track and correct for macroscopic in-plane motion, combined with a model-based self-navigated water/fat decomposition. This allows to correct for both physiological and macroscopic in-plane motion effects in DWI when estimating water and fat resolved images from chemical-shift encoded multi-shot EPI data.

Introduction

Fat is an interfering factor in EPI-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) because of its chemical shift and low diffusion coefficient. To overcome shortcomings of conventional fat suppression (e.g., sensitivity to B0 and/or B1+ inhomogeneities, failure of removing the olefinic fat peak), the combination of chemical-shift encoding (Dixon-based) and DWI has become increasingly popular1,2. Extra navigators or self-navigation is needed for each chemical-shift encoded shot, as usual in known multi-shot DWI schemes3-5, to handle the phase changes caused by diffusion gradient induced phase-differences in presence of small physiological motion. However, macroscopic subject motion during the scan can also impair image quality, requiring further correction. Extra phase navigators could be employed for in-plane motion tracking, albeit suffering from the presence of fat signals and reduced scan efficiency2. 2D fat-only navigators based on additional fat-selective excitation6, inspired us to follow a different route. In this work, we propose to use a SENSE-based water/fat separation7 to estimate a fat navigator for each shot acquisition to track and correct for macroscopic in-plane motion-induced data misalignment. This was combined with a model-based self-navigated water/fat decomposition (MSND) algorithm8 to jointly correct both physiological and macroscopic in-plane motion artefacts and to estimate water/fat images from chemical-shift encoded multi-shot EPI data.

Methods

To estimate water/fat images $$$x=\left[\rho_w,\rho_f\right]^T$$$of a given b-value, a minimization problem can be set up as:$$\left\{\rho_w,\rho_f\right\}^*=\underset{\rho_w,\rho_f\in\mathbb{C}^Q}{\operatorname{argmin}}\|Ax-s\|_2^2,\qquad(1)$$ where $$$s$$$ is the measured multi-shot EPI k-space data with N Dixon points, L shots and J coils. $$$A$$$ is the system matrix that can be expressed as:$$A x=K\left[\begin{array}{ll}I&I\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}F&0\\0&\Psi_f F\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}C&0\\0&C\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\Psi_B&0\\0&\Psi_B\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\Phi&0\\0&\Phi\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}M&0\\0&M\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}\rho_w\\\rho_f\end{array}\right],\qquad(2)$$where $$$K$$$ indicates the EPI trajectory of each shot, $$$I$$$ the identity matrix, $$$\Psi_f$$$ adds the fat off-resonance, $$$F$$$ the Fourier transform, $$$C$$$ adds coil sensitivity weighting, $$$\Psi_B$$$ adds B0-induced phase, $$$\Phi$$$ adds physiology-induced phase and $$$M$$$ adds macroscopic motion-induced transformation. These matrices are all implemented via linear operators to support efficient computations. To obtain $$$M$$$ (2D in-plane), fat images for each shot can be used to track the motion. To generate such a fat navigator efficiently, a SENSE-based water/fat separating image reconstruction is performed for each shot by introducing the chemical-shift-induced spatial shift of fat in EPI into a conventional SENSE model7. In this case, each EPI shot can be seen as an individual undersampled data set for which water/fat images can be reconstructed jointly7. Thus, the system matrix $$$B_{n,l}$$$ of $$$n$$$-th Dixon step and $$$l$$$-th shot can be written as:$$S_{n, l}=K_{n, l}[\hat{I}\hat{I}]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\hat{F}&0\\0&\widehat{\Psi}_f F\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\hat{C}&0\\0&\hat{C}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}\rho_{w,n,l}\\\rho_{f,n,l}\end{array}\right]=B_{n,l}x_{n,l},\qquad(3)$$where $$$\hat{I},\hat{F},\widehat{\Psi}_f,\hat{C}$$$ are similar to $$$I,F,\Psi_f,C$$$ but acting on each Dixon step/shot data (n,l). However, in such an ill-conditioned problem, a proper solution for both water/fat components can be difficult to reach. But estimating a good fat image is much easier when using proper regularization, given the sparsity of the fat signal. Therefore, the Split Bregman algorithm9 is used to regularize both water/fat channels as:$$\left\{\tilde{\rho}_{w,n,l},\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}\right\}^*=\underset{\tilde{\rho}_{w,n,l,l}\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}\in\mathbb{C}^Q}{\operatorname{argmin}}\left\{\frac{\mu}{2}\left\|B_{n,l}\tilde{x}_{n,l}-s\right\|_2^2+\frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\left\|\nabla_x x_{n,l}\right\|_1+\left\|\nabla_y x_{n,l}\right\|_1\right)\right\},\qquad(4)$$where $$$\nabla_{x/y}$$$are first-order differential operators. The in total reconstructed N$$$\times$$$L individual fat navigators $$$\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}$$$ can be used to estimate the rigid motion operators while performing registration to the reference $$$n_{0}$$$-th and $$$l_{0}$$$-th fat navigator. In this work, the diffeomorphic field-based registration10 with linear interpolation for resampling was used. This motion estimation step needs to be performed for all shots as a preprocessing step. From the non-diffusion case (b=0 s/mm2), a B0 map was estimated by setting up a Gauss-Newton loop for Eq.2 (neglecting the diffusion phase ) to jointly estimate water/fat images and a B0 map. The coil-sensitivity map was estimated by ESPIRiT8,11. For the diffusion case, after the rigid motion estimation, the water/fat images using self-navigation, applied to estimate the physiological motion-induced shot-to-shot phase errors, can be calculated via the MSND algorithm8 as shown in Fig.1. The regularization parameters $$${\mu}/{\lambda}$$$ were chosen as 0.01/0.0005.
To test this motion correction approach, leg/knee data were acquired using a 3T-MRI (Philips, Best, Netherlands). A 4-shot (msh) chemical-shift encoded DW EPI spin-echo sequence2,8 was applied with the following parameters: TR/TE=5000/74ms, resolution 1.5×1.5×4 mm3, three b-values (0,300,600 s/mm2), using a 16-channel knee coil. Three chemical-shift encoding steps TEs 0.2/1.0/1.8 ms relative to the spin echo were used. One volunteer’s calf and one volunteer’s knee data were acquired with the volunteers asked to move their leg slightly in-plane, in between shots, to simulate macroscopic motion-induced in-plane inconsistencies between the different shots during scanning.

Results

Figure 2 shows example fat navigators along with the registration performance. Figure 3 shows diffusion data reconstructed with/without phase estimation (corrected for physiological motion) and with/without macroscopic motion correction. With both options active, an artefact-free water image can be achieved. Figures 4 and 5 show two different volunteers’ data, comparing three b-values using MSND without/with macroscopic motion correction. The proposed motion correction can improve image quality for water, fat, and ADC quantification simultaneously.

Discussion and conclusion

The proposed method allows for good correction of both macroscopic and physiological motion in DW multi-shot EPI to estimate artifact-free water/fat images with ADC maps. Future studies will include experiments in other anatomies such as the head/neck, breast and abdomen where good fat suppression is also required, and unavoidable macroscopic motion is present.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge NWO-TTW (HTSM-17104).

References

1. Burakiewicz J, Charles-Edwards DG, Goh V, Schaeffter T. Water-fat separation in diffusion-weighted EPI using an IDEAL approach with image navigator. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):964-72.

2. Dong Y, Koolstra K, Riedel M, van Osch MJP, Börnert P. Regularized joint water–fat separation with B0 map estimation in image space for 2D-navigated interleaved EPI based diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 00: 1– 18.

3. Butts, K., Pauly, J., De Crespigny, A. and Moseley, M. (1997), Isotropic diffusion-weighted and spiral-navigated interleaved EPI for routine imaging of acute stroke. Magn Reson Med., 38: 741-749.

4. Jeong H-K, Gore JC, Anderson AW. High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated multishot SENSE EPI at 7 T. MRM. 2013;69(3):793-802.

5. Chen NK, Guidon A, Chang HC, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:41-7.

6. Skare S, Hartwig A, Mårtensson M, Avventi E, Engström M. Properties of a 2D fat navigator for prospective image domain correction of nodding motion in brain MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):1110-9.

7. Uecker, M. & Lustig, M. Making SENSE of Chemical Shift: Separating Species in Single-Shot EPI using Multiple Coils. In Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag Reson Med., 20, 2490 (Melbourne, 2012).

8. Dong, Y, Riedel, M, Koolstra, K, van Osch, MJP, Börnert, P. Water/fat separation for self-navigated diffusion-weighted multishot echo-planar imaging. NMR in Biomedicine. 2022;e4822. doi:10.1002/nbm.4822

9. Koolstra K, van Gemert J, Börnert P, Webb A, Remis R. Accelerating compressed sensing in parallel imaging reconstructions using an efficient circulant preconditioner for cartesian trajectories. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(1):670-685.

10. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L., Grossman, M., & Gee, J. C. (2009). Symmetric Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Cross-Correlation: Evaluating Automated Labeling of Elderly and Neurodegenerative Brain, 12(1), 26-41.

11. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al. ESPIRiT - An eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(3):990-1001.

Figures

Figure 1. Reconstruction pipeline. (left) First, using the SENSE-based fat navigators, motion registration is performed on non-diffusion data, followed by a Dixon-model-based joint water/fat and B0 maps estimation algorithm and ESPIRiT. This information is used as prior for the diffusion reconstruction. (Right) Fat navigator-based motion registration is repeated for diffusion data to conduct a macroscopic motion-corrected MSND phase estimation to calculate the shot-to-shot phase maps for each shot and to reconstruct artefact-free DW water/fat resolved images.

Figure 2. Fat navigator registration. Four fat navigators of one subject’s leg (b=600 s/mm2 ) are shown, estimated via SENSE-based water/fat separation for each shot/Dixon point. Magnitude shown before registration (top row) / after registration (second row). Shot 1 is chosen as the reference shot which the remaining spatially mismatched navigators (third row) are registered to. After registration, these mismatches are mitigated (bottom row). This information is used to generate the operator to correct the macroscopic motion in the forward model.

Figure 3. Water image of one subject’s calf (b = 300 s/mm2). (A) Images reconstructed without macroscopic motion correction and without phase estimation, (B) with macroscopic motion correction and without phase estimation, (C) without macroscopic motion correction and with phase estimation, (D) with macroscopic bulk motion correction and phase estimation.

Figure 4. Water/fat images of one subject’s knee. Comparison between reconstruction without/with macroscopic motion correction. The macroscopic motion can compromise the water/fat separation, which is clearly seen in both water (unsuppressed fat rim) and fat channel (blurred image). Some abnormal ADC values can also be found in the water ADC maps as marked by red arrow. All these ambiguities can be removed by using the proposed method with macroscopic motion correction.

Figure 5. Water/fat images of one subject’s calf. Comparison between reconstruction without/with macroscopic motion correction. The macroscopic motion leaves behind some fat ghosting in the water channel and causes artefacts in the diffusion measurement. This can be corrected by including the macroscopic motion correction in the reconstruction pipeline.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
1015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/1015