Yiming Dong1, Kirsten Koolstra2, Malte Riedel3, Matthias J.P. van Osch1, and Peter Börnert1,4
1C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Philips, Best, Netherlands, 3University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 4Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany
Synopsis
Keywords: Motion Correction, Motion Correction
The presence of fat is a challenge in diffusion-weighted EPI.
Recently, chemical-shift encoded approaches found interest, as a smart way of
signal averaging, doing water/fat separation and diffusion phase navigation in
the reconstruction. However, the dominant signal character of fat in diffusion could
actually also be exploited as an advantage by forming a shot-specific fat
navigator to track and correct for macroscopic in-plane motion, combined with a
model-based self-navigated water/fat decomposition. This allows to correct for both
physiological and macroscopic in-plane motion effects in DWI when estimating
water and fat resolved images from chemical-shift encoded multi-shot EPI data.
Introduction
Fat is an interfering factor in EPI-based diffusion-weighted imaging
(DWI) because of its chemical shift and low diffusion coefficient. To overcome
shortcomings of conventional fat suppression (e.g., sensitivity to B0 and/or B1+ inhomogeneities, failure of removing the olefinic
fat peak), the combination of chemical-shift encoding (Dixon-based) and DWI has
become increasingly popular1,2. Extra navigators or self-navigation is
needed for each chemical-shift encoded shot, as usual in known multi-shot DWI
schemes3-5, to handle the phase changes caused by diffusion gradient
induced phase-differences in presence of small physiological motion. However,
macroscopic subject motion during the scan can also impair image quality, requiring
further correction. Extra phase navigators could be employed for in-plane
motion tracking, albeit suffering from the presence of fat signals and reduced
scan efficiency2. 2D fat-only navigators based on additional fat-selective
excitation6, inspired us to follow a different route.
In this work, we propose to use a SENSE-based water/fat separation7
to estimate a fat navigator for each shot acquisition to track and correct for
macroscopic in-plane motion-induced data misalignment. This was combined with a
model-based self-navigated water/fat decomposition (MSND) algorithm8
to jointly correct both physiological and macroscopic in-plane motion artefacts
and to estimate water/fat images from chemical-shift encoded multi-shot EPI data.Methods
To estimate water/fat images $$$x=\left[\rho_w,\rho_f\right]^T$$$of a given b-value, a minimization problem can
be set up as:$$\left\{\rho_w,\rho_f\right\}^*=\underset{\rho_w,\rho_f\in\mathbb{C}^Q}{\operatorname{argmin}}\|Ax-s\|_2^2,\qquad(1)$$ where $$$s$$$ is the measured multi-shot EPI k-space data with
N Dixon points, L shots and J coils. $$$A$$$ is
the system matrix that can be expressed as:$$A x=K\left[\begin{array}{ll}I&I\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}F&0\\0&\Psi_f F\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}C&0\\0&C\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\Psi_B&0\\0&\Psi_B\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\Phi&0\\0&\Phi\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}M&0\\0&M\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}\rho_w\\\rho_f\end{array}\right],\qquad(2)$$where $$$K$$$ indicates the EPI trajectory of each shot, $$$I$$$ the
identity matrix, $$$\Psi_f$$$ adds the fat off-resonance, $$$F$$$ the
Fourier transform, $$$C$$$ adds coil sensitivity weighting, $$$\Psi_B$$$ adds B0-induced phase, $$$\Phi$$$ adds
physiology-induced phase and $$$M$$$ adds macroscopic motion-induced
transformation. These matrices are all implemented via linear operators to
support efficient computations. To obtain
$$$M$$$ (2D in-plane), fat images for each shot can be used to track
the motion. To generate such a fat navigator efficiently, a SENSE-based
water/fat separating image reconstruction is performed for each shot by
introducing the chemical-shift-induced spatial shift of fat in EPI into a
conventional SENSE model7. In this case, each EPI shot can be seen
as an individual undersampled data set for which water/fat images can be
reconstructed jointly7. Thus, the system matrix $$$B_{n,l}$$$ of $$$n$$$-th Dixon step and $$$l$$$-th shot can be written as:$$S_{n, l}=K_{n, l}[\hat{I}\hat{I}]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\hat{F}&0\\0&\widehat{\Psi}_f F\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\hat{C}&0\\0&\hat{C}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}\rho_{w,n,l}\\\rho_{f,n,l}\end{array}\right]=B_{n,l}x_{n,l},\qquad(3)$$where $$$\hat{I},\hat{F},\widehat{\Psi}_f,\hat{C}$$$ are similar to $$$I,F,\Psi_f,C$$$ but acting on each Dixon step/shot data (n,l). However, in such an ill-conditioned problem,
a proper solution for both water/fat components can be difficult to reach. But
estimating a good fat image is much easier when using proper regularization,
given the sparsity of the fat signal. Therefore, the Split Bregman algorithm9
is used to regularize both water/fat channels as:$$\left\{\tilde{\rho}_{w,n,l},\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}\right\}^*=\underset{\tilde{\rho}_{w,n,l,l}\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}\in\mathbb{C}^Q}{\operatorname{argmin}}\left\{\frac{\mu}{2}\left\|B_{n,l}\tilde{x}_{n,l}-s\right\|_2^2+\frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\left\|\nabla_x x_{n,l}\right\|_1+\left\|\nabla_y x_{n,l}\right\|_1\right)\right\},\qquad(4)$$where $$$\nabla_{x/y}$$$are first-order
differential operators. The in total reconstructed N$$$\times$$$L individual fat navigators $$$\tilde{\rho}_{f,n,l}$$$ can be used to estimate the rigid motion operators while performing
registration to the reference $$$n_{0}$$$-th and $$$l_{0}$$$-th fat
navigator. In this work, the diffeomorphic field-based registration10
with linear interpolation for resampling was used. This motion estimation step
needs to be performed for all shots as a preprocessing step. From the
non-diffusion case (b=0 s/mm2), a B0 map was estimated by
setting up a Gauss-Newton loop for Eq.2 (neglecting the diffusion phase ) to
jointly estimate water/fat images and a B0 map. The coil-sensitivity
map was estimated by ESPIRiT8,11. For the diffusion case, after the rigid
motion estimation, the water/fat images using self-navigation, applied to
estimate the physiological motion-induced shot-to-shot phase errors, can be
calculated via the MSND algorithm8 as shown in Fig.1. The regularization
parameters $$${\mu}/{\lambda}$$$ were chosen as 0.01/0.0005.
To test this motion correction
approach, leg/knee data were acquired using a 3T-MRI (Philips, Best,
Netherlands). A 4-shot (msh) chemical-shift encoded DW EPI spin-echo sequence2,8 was
applied with the following parameters: TR/TE=5000/74ms, resolution 1.5×1.5×4 mm3, three b-values (0,300,600 s/mm2),
using a 16-channel knee coil. Three chemical-shift encoding steps TEs 0.2/1.0/1.8 ms relative
to the spin echo were used. One volunteer’s calf and one volunteer’s knee data were acquired with the
volunteers asked to move their leg slightly in-plane, in between shots, to
simulate macroscopic motion-induced in-plane inconsistencies between the
different shots during scanning.Results
Figure 2 shows example
fat navigators along with the registration performance. Figure 3 shows
diffusion data reconstructed with/without phase estimation (corrected for
physiological motion) and with/without macroscopic motion correction. With both
options active, an artefact-free water image can be achieved. Figures 4 and 5
show two different volunteers’
data, comparing three b-values using MSND without/with macroscopic motion
correction. The proposed motion correction can improve image quality for water,
fat, and ADC quantification simultaneously.Discussion and conclusion
The proposed method allows for
good correction of both macroscopic and physiological motion in DW multi-shot
EPI to estimate artifact-free water/fat images with ADC maps. Future studies
will include experiments in other anatomies such as the head/neck, breast and
abdomen where good fat suppression is also required, and unavoidable
macroscopic motion is present. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge NWO-TTW (HTSM-17104).References
1. Burakiewicz J,
Charles-Edwards DG, Goh V, Schaeffter T. Water-fat separation in
diffusion-weighted EPI using an IDEAL approach with image navigator. Magn Reson
Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):964-72.
2. Dong
Y, Koolstra K, Riedel M, van Osch MJP, Börnert
P. Regularized joint water–fat separation
with B0 map estimation in image space for 2D-navigated interleaved EPI based
diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 00: 1– 18.
3. Butts, K., Pauly, J., De
Crespigny, A. and Moseley, M. (1997), Isotropic diffusion-weighted and
spiral-navigated interleaved EPI for routine imaging of acute stroke. Magn Reson
Med., 38: 741-749.
4. Jeong H-K, Gore JC, Anderson
AW. High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated
multishot SENSE EPI at 7 T. MRM. 2013;69(3):793-802.
5. Chen
NK, Guidon A, Chang HC, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for
high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed
sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:41-7.
6. Skare S, Hartwig A, Mårtensson M, Avventi E, Engström M.
Properties of a 2D fat navigator for prospective image domain correction of
nodding motion in brain MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):1110-9.
7. Uecker, M. & Lustig, M.
Making SENSE of Chemical Shift: Separating Species in Single-Shot EPI using
Multiple Coils. In Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag Reson Med., 20, 2490
(Melbourne, 2012).
8. Dong, Y, Riedel, M, Koolstra,
K, van Osch, MJP, Börnert, P.
Water/fat separation for self-navigated diffusion-weighted multishot
echo-planar imaging. NMR in Biomedicine. 2022;e4822. doi:10.1002/nbm.4822
9. Koolstra
K, van Gemert J, Börnert P, Webb
A, Remis R. Accelerating compressed sensing in parallel imaging reconstructions
using an efficient circulant preconditioner for cartesian trajectories. Magn
Reson Med. 2019;81(1):670-685.
10. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L.,
Grossman, M., & Gee, J. C. (2009). Symmetric Diffeomorphic Image
Registration with Cross-Correlation: Evaluating Automated Labeling of Elderly
and Neurodegenerative Brain, 12(1), 26-41.
11. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al. ESPIRiT
- An eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets
GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(3):990-1001.