Keywords: Liver, Velocity & Flow
Early prediction of remnant liver growth after portal vein embolization (PVE) would enable earlier surgery in patients with liver malignancies and thus decrease the risk of tumor progression. Portal blood flow after PVE holds the potential to be an important predictor for hypertrophy of the non-embolized segments. We demonstrated the feasibility of 4D flow MRI quantification of portal blood flow before and after PVE in a porcine model. Flow changes immediately after PVE were predictive of the change in liver volume 2 weeks post PVE in both the embolized and non-embolized liver lobes.
The authors wish to acknowledge support from the NIH (R01 DK096169, UL1TR00427, K24 DK102595, R01 DK125783), as well as GE Healthcare which provides research support to the University of Wisconsin and Bracco Diagnostics. Dr. Oechtering receives funding from the German Research Foundation (OE 746/1-1). Dr. Reeder is a Fred Lee Sr. Endowed Chair of Radiology.
1. Memeo R, Conticchio M, Deshayes E, et al. Optimization of the future remnant liver: review of the current strategies in Europe. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021;10:350-63.
2. van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, et al. Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2013;36:25-34.
3. Espersen C, Borgwardt L, Larsen PN, Andersen TB, Stenholt L, Petersen LJ. Comparison of nuclear imaging techniques and volumetric imaging for the prediction of postoperative mortality and liver failure in patients undergoing localized liver-directed treatments: a systematic review. EJNMMI Res 2021;11:80.
4. Heil J, Schiesser M, Schadde E. Current trends in regenerative liver surgery: Novel clinical strategies and experimental approaches. Front Surg 2022;9:903825.
5. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Annals of surgery 2008;247:49-57.
6. Hadjittofi C, Feretis M, Martin J, Harper S, Huguet E. Liver regeneration biology: Implications for liver tumour therapies. World J Clin Oncol 2021;12:1101-56.
7. Oechtering TH, Roberts GS, Panagiotopoulos N, Wieben O, Reeder SB, Roldan-Alzate A. Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MRI in the Portal Venous System. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022.
8. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2005;26:743-9.
9. Johnson KM, Markl M. Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010;63:349-55.
10. Kito Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y. Doppler sonography of hepatic arterial blood flow velocity after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2001;176:909-12.
11. Kin Y, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. Doppler analysis of hepatic blood flow predicts liver dysfunction after major hepatectomy. World journal of surgery 1994;18:143-9.
12. Huang Y, Ge W, Kong Y, et al. Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization for Liver Resection: An updated meta-analysis. J Cancer 2021;12:1770-8.
Figure 1: Pigs (14-16 weeks, 45-60kg) were examined directly before and after portal vein embolization (PVE) as well as 1 and 2 weeks after PVE. PVE was performed after percutaneous access to the right lateral portal vein branch under ultrasound guidance. Two of the 4 main portal vein branches were embolized under fluoroscopy guidance until stasis of flow was achieved. Embolic agent were 150-355 microns polyvinyl-alcohol-particles (Merit Medical, UT, USA) in 40% iodine contrast agent (Iopamiron 300, Bracco; Milano, Italy) and 60% normal saline.
Figure 2: Imaging was performed at a clinical 3T MRI (Discovery750w, GE Healthcare, WI, USA) with a 32-channel phased-array coil and after i.v. contrast (0.05 mmol/kg Gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, MA, USA). PCVIPR was acquired to measure main and lobar portal flow (MPV: main portal vein; RLPV: right lateral portal vein; RMPV: right medial portal vein; LMPV: left medial portal vein; LLPV: left lateral portal vein; volume rendering of complex difference angiogram visualizes analysis plane positions). T1-w 3D spoiled gradient echo images were acquired to measure liver lobe volume.
Figure 3: a) Absolute flow and b) percentage of total portal flow to the embolized lobes decreased significantly after portal vein embolization between visits 1 and 2 proving successful intervention. Conversely, absolute and relative flow to the non-embolized lobes increased after the procedure and slowly decreased in the following weeks. Absolute flow in the control animals increased with aging while relative flow in the portal vein branches remained relatively constant. c) Volumes of the embolized lobes decreased while they increased in non-embolized and reference lobes.
Figure 4: Streamline visualization of portal venous flow in two pigs shows the absent flow of both left portal veins immediately after portal vein embolization (PVE) (arrow, visit 2). There was a compensatory velocity increase in the non-embolized portal veins (arrowheads). Note that there was no flow in the right medial portal vein of pig 6, presumably due to backflow of particles. One week (Visit 3) and two weeks (Visit 4) after embolization, the embolized vessels are again patent. Velocity in the right portal veins remained slightly higher relative to the previously embolized veins.
Figure 5: Post-contrast T1-w images demonstrate the treatment effect from the portal vein embolization with reduced contrast enhancement and atrophy of the left liver lobes one and two weeks after embolization (visits 3 and 4, yellow arrows).