Hahnsung Kim1,2, Suhyung Park3,4, Ranliang Hu2, Kimberly B Hoang5, and Phillip Zhe Sun1,2
1Emory National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States, 33Department of Computer Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 4Department of ICT Convergence System Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 5Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: CEST & MT, CEST & MT
We proposed a new 3D EPI
CEST imaging integrated with unevenly segmented RF irradiation configuration to
reduce T
1w relaxation-induced signal modulation, thereby allowing for a reliable
CEST effect over the whole volume. In addition, a temporal random walk with
variable density (VD) CAIPI undersampling is incorporated into segmented 3D EPI
for optimized random encoding in CEST imaging. The proposed pulse sequence and reconstruction framework were validated on the phantom and tumor patient.
INTRODUCTION:
3D CEST MRI is
often implemented with a long RF irradiation followed by a rapid image readout
sequence such as EPI to cover the whole volume of the object [1-3]. However, increasing
the spatial and spectral coverage is challenging without extending the scan
time or losing some of the CEST effects. An unevenly segmented RF irradiation
module, in which a long primary RF pulse generates the steady-state CEST effect
with repetitive short secondary RF irradiation to maintain the CEST effect, has
been developed for 2D multi-slice CEST imaging [4]. We propose a new 3D EPI
CEST imaging integrated with unevenly segmented RF irradiation configuration to
reduce T1w relaxation-induced signal modulation, thereby allowing for a reliable
CEST effect over the whole volume. In addition, a temporal random walk with
variable density (VD) CAIPI undersampling is incorporated into segmented 3D EPI
for optimized random encoding in CEST imaging. Numerical simulations,
phantom studies, and tumor patient studies were performed to validate optimal
imaging protocols.METHODS:
Pulse Sequence Design: Fig. 1 shows the
proposed 3D CEST imaging with unevenly segmented RF irradiation configuration.
Following a relaxation delay, a long primary continuous wave RF saturation is
applied to generate the CEST effect. Repetitive short RF saturation pulses are
inserted between partition acquisition to maintain CEST contrast over the
volumetric imaging. A rapid segmented 3D EPI readout accommodates as many ky
phase encoding steps as possible in each repetition time.
Reconstruction: Time-wise
random blips allow uniform encoding in the spatial domain while random encoding
along the temporal direction. SENSE-based spatiotemporal reconstruction was
jointly imposed with multiple temporal priors (low rank and sparsity) (Fig.
1b) [5].
Numerical Simulation: Two-pool Bloch-McConnell
simulations were performed to investigate the effect of imaging parameters on
the SNR of CEST and imaging time efficiency. The labile proton ratio and
exchange rate were assumed to be 0.1% and 100 s-1 at
3.5 ppm. We assumed Ts1/Ts2/Td = 1.5/0.3/1.5 sec, B1 = 1.0 uT and 24
excitations with centric reordering. Peak PSF amplitude and effective volume
acquisition time were measured with varying FAs and segments.
Experimental Studies: All data were obtained at a 3T
Siemens whole-body MAGNETOM Prisma scanner (Siemens
Healthineers). Informed written consent was obtained following
IRB-approved protocol.
Phantom studies: Phantom data in the sagittal
orientation were acquired. The mixture of 1.5% agarose and 100 mM l-carnosine
was doped with MnCl2 (15μM, 30μM). Two vials were inserted into a 500 ml container with
1.5% agarose. The MRI parameters were: B1 = 1.0 uT, offset frequencies from -5
to 5 ppm with increments of 0.125 ppm, Ts1/Ts2 = 1.5/0.3 sec, Td = 1.5 sec, FOV
= 140x108x80 mm3, 2 mm isotropic spatial resolution, and the number of
partition = 40. CEST contrast was measured with varying FAs from 10° to 80°
with a 10° increment. We compared 3D CEST images with/without short secondary
RF in axial-oriented images (y-z planes).
Volunteer studies: Two sets of 3D brain
images with/without secondary RF saturation (Ts1/Ts2/Td =1.5/0.3/1.5 sec) were
acquired in the axial orientation. B1 = 1.0 uT, offset frequencies from -5
to 5 ppm with increments of 0.125 ppm, FOV = 220x220x80 mm3,
2 mm isotropic spatial resolution, number of partition = 40, 6 segments, 6-fold
acceleration, TR = 35 ms and water excitation RF pulse with FA = 20°.
Total imaging times were 5 min 14 sec (without Ts2) and 6 min 28 sec (with
Ts2), respectively.
Tumor patient studies: Two sets of the proposed
3D EPI CEST images with different B1 (1.0 and 2.0 uT) were acquired. For
high-resolution anatomical imaging, 1 mm3 isotropic 3D MPRAGE imaging was used. RESULTS/DISCUSSION:
Fig. 2
shows contour plots of relative SNR (rSNR) and imaging time efficiency (η).
rSNR rises with increasing FA in a range of small FA (≤ 25°), while the
amplitude of rSNR gradually falls with increasing FA. η increased with
decreasing segments. Fig. 3 demonstrates the effect of FA on the CEST contrast
of the proposed 3D CEST imaging. Compared to the conventional 3D CEST
imaging without short saturation RF configuration, the proposed method showed
high SNR CEST contrast in the range of small FA. In normal brain imaging, the
proposed method showed clear CEST contrast without signal modulation artifact
(Fig. 4). Due to the signal modulation along the z-direction, imaging blurring
leads to losing CEST contrast in the conventional 3D CEST imaging. The proposed
method clearly delineated tumor tissue with higher CEST sensitivity (Fig.
5). CONCLUSION:
Our
work demonstrated 3D CEST imaging with unevenly segmented RF irradiation
configuration reduces the loss of CEST contrast during volumetric acquisition.
With a balance between SNR and imaging time, we found the optimal parameters of
FA (near 20°) and ranges of segments (4~8). The proposed method integrated with
the parallel imaging technique can be extended to clinical applications. Acknowledgements
This
study was supported in part by grants from NIH/NINDS 2R01NS083654 (to Sun), and
NRF/MSIT No. 2021R1C1C1013603 (to Park).References
[1] Akeby S, et al. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:1741-1752
[2] Sebastian M, et al.,
Magn Reson Med 2020;84:2469-2483
[3]
Steffen G, et al., Magn Reson Med
2021;86:393-404
[4] Sun PZ et al., Magn
Reson Med 2011;65:588-94
[5] Park S et al., In Proceedings of Annual
Meeting of ISMRM, 2021, p0629