Yahang Li1,2, Zepeng Wang 1,2, Aaron Anderson 2,3, Ruiyang Zhao 2,4, Paul Arnold 2,3, Graham Huesmann 2,3,5, and Fan Lam 1,2,4
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 2Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Urbaba, IL, United States, 3Neuroscience Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbaba, IL, United States, 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 5School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Spectroscopy
A
computationally efficient MRSI reconstruction method is presented. The proposed
problem formulation integrates a subspace model of the high-dimensional
spatiotemporal function (SPICE) and a network-based learned projector on to a low-dimensional
manifold of generic spectroscopic signals. The subspace representation allows
for more flexible spatiotemporal sampling designs than using nonlinear manifold
constraint alone, while the manifold constraint effectively regularizes the
subspace fitting, especially at higher orders. An efficient algorithm is
designed to solve the optimization problem. The benefits of the proposed
synergy have been demonstrated using simulations as well as experimental
31P
and
1H-MRSI data.
Introduction
Subspace
imaging methods have demonstrated significantly improved tradeoffs in speed,
resolution, and SNR for various MRSI applications1-8. Besides reducing
the number of degrees-of-freedom, subspace models also allow for flexible temporal
sampling (e.g., acquiring truncated or subNyquist FIDs for acceleration or
rapid spatiospectral encoding), as the basis determines the spectral resolution
(unlike the standard Fourier transform). Meanwhile, model order selection remains
challenging. One solution is to choose a relaxed higher order for better model
accuracy which increases the number of unknowns and worsens the conditioning of the
fitting problem9,10. Recently, more efficient neural network (NN)
based nonlinear low-dimensional models have shown great potential in improving MRSI
reconstruction, e.g., the RAIISE method (joint leaRning of nonlineAr
representatIon and projectIon for faSt constrained MRSI rEconstruction)9.
However, this approach does not afford as flexible FID sampling design as subspace
fitting. Here, we propose a novel method that integrates subspace modeling and
nonlinear manifold-based regularization via a unified formulation, taking the advantage of both methods. A highly efficient algorithm leveraging ADMM and an
NN-based learned manifold projector was developed to solve the associated optimization
problem. We have evaluated our method using simulations as well as in vivo 31P-MRSI
and 1H-MRSI data. High-fidelity, high-SNR reconstructions from noisy
MRSI data can be produced with flexible FID sampling designs, demonstrating the proposed method's advantages over subspace or manifold model alone.Theory: Problem Formulation and Algorithm
The key ingredients in the proposed method are: (1) A
predetermined linear subspace to model the high-dimensional
spatiotemporal/spatiospectral function (see1-8 for extensive
discussion on subspace estimation); (2) Jointly learned NN-based nonlinear
manifold of spectroscopic signals and a projector to recover the
low-dimensional embeddings from noisy FIDs; and (3) A formulation combining (1)
and (2). Specifically, we formulate the reconstruction as:$$\min_\mathbf{U,z}\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})\quad(1)\\s.t.\mathbf{UV}=D(\mathbf{z}),$$where $$$\mathbf{UV}$$$ is the
subspace model ($$$\mathbf{V}$$$ containing the basis), $$$\mathbf{d}$$$ the $$$(k,t)$$$-space data, $$$\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}$$$ an
encoding operator with $$$(k,t)$$$-sampling pattern $$$\Omega$$$, $$$\mathbf{B}$$$ models the B0 inhomogeneity, and $$$R(.)$$$ imposes
complementary spatial regularization with parameter $$$\lambda$$$,
e.g., $$$R(\mathbf{UV})=\|\mathbf{D}_w\mathbf{UV}\|_2$$$1. The constraint $$$\mathbf{UV}=D(\mathbf{z})$$$ enforces the prior that the underlying
spectroscopic signal should yield a
low-dimensional manifold embedding $$$\mathbf{z}$$$. $$$D(.)$$$ is a learned decoder/generator as part of the
learned NN
model (i.e., complex-valued autoencoder as described in the RAIISE method9). Note that the subspace model order can be
higher (more accurate) with the nonlinear manifold regularization.
An ADMM-based algorithm was used to
solve Eq. (1). The augmented Lagrangian function is:$$\boldsymbol{L}(\mathbf{U},\mathbf{z},\mathbf{Y})=\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})+\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{UV}-D(\mathbf{z})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2,$$where $$$\mathbf{Y}$$$ is the Lagrangian multiplier. The
following three subproblems were solved iteratively ($$$i$$$ being the iteration index):
Subproblem (I): Update $$$\mathbf{U}$$$$$\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{U}}\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})+\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{UV}-D(\mathbf{z}^{(i)})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2,$$which is the subspace fitting in SPICE with an
additional regularization term.
Subproblem (II): Update $$$\mathbf{z}$$$$$\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}-D(\mathbf{z})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2.$$
Directly solving this problem
requires time-consuming backpropagation. Thus, we adapted the learned
projection concept in RAIISE and reformulated subproblem (II) as:$$\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\mu}{2}\|P(\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu})-\mathbf{z}\|_{F}^2,$$where $$$P(.)$$$ is the learned manifold projector with $$$P(D(\mathbf{z}))=\mathbf{z}$$$.
Subproblem (III): Update $$$\mathbf{Y}$$$$$\mathbf{Y}^{(i+1)}=\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}+\mu(\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}-D(\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}))$$Methods
The
proposed method was evaluated using simulations and experimental data. For
simulation, a 31P phantom was generated with a lesion-mimicking
feature and noise added to $$$(k,t)$$$-space data (details in10).
In vivo 31P-MRSI
data were acquired from a healthy volunteer on a Siemens Magnetom 9.4T system with: TR/TE = 250/1.3 ms, FOV = 180$$$\times$$$200$$$\times$$$180 mm3,
matrix size = 28$$$\times$$$30$$$\times$$$13,
spectral BW = 5000 Hz and 512 FID points11. The reconstruction used the first 256 points with $$$\times$$$2
undersampling (128 points in total) to demonstrate the ability of flexible
sampling. 1H-MRSI data were acquired from a post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) patient on a Prisma 3T system using a
3D-EPSI sequence: TR/TE = 1000/65 ms, FOV = 220$$$\times$$$220$$$\times$$$64 mm3,
matrix size = 42$$$\times$$$42$$$\times$$$8,
spectral BW = 1087 Hz and 200 FID points. Reconstruction was performed at 512-pt
FID length for a higher spectral resolution. All in vivo studies were IRB-approved.Results
For simulation, we compared the proposed method
with reconstructions using subspace (SPICE, model order 26 with 5% truncation
error) or nonlinear manifold constraints (RAIISE) alone, from both temporally
truncated (Fig. 1) and undersampled (Fig. 2) FIDs (shorter FID for SNR or
shorter TRs, and undersampled FID mimicking EPSI acquisitions with large echo
spacings due to gradient limits). As can be seen, SPICE-based reconstruction with
a higher model order tends to overfit for truncated FIDs (Fig. 1), while the
performance of RAIISE deteriorates substantially for undersampled data (Fig.
2). The proposed method produced the best reconstruction in both scenarios quantitatively (with MSE) and qualitatively,
demonstrating its robustness for various sampling choices. In vivo 31P-MRSI reconstruction
($$$\times$$$2
truncation and $$$\times$$$2 undersampling) are
shown in Fig. 3. Similarly, we can observe that both high order subspace and
RAIISE yielded degraded reconstructions with over/under fitting issues, while
the proposed method consistently achieved high-fidelity, high SNR reconstruction (Fig. 3;
orange arrows indicating better-preserved spectral features revealed by truncated
FIDs). Figures 4 and 5 show 1H-MRSI reconstruction from a PTE patient. The proposed method produced again better-quality
spectra (Fig. 4) and tissue contrast with better lesion delineation (Fig. 5). Summary
A novel MRSI reconstruction method that combines
linear and nonlinear models was developed. Improved reconstructions from
simulation and in vivo data with different FID sampling designs demonstrate
the advantages of the proposed method and its potential for accelerated
acquisitions. Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NSF-CBET-1944249 and NIH-NIBIB-1R21EB029076AReferences
[1] Lam F, Liang Z-P. A subspace approach to high-resolution
spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2014.
[2] Lam F, et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance
spectroscopic imaging using SPICE with learned subspaces. Magn Reson Med, 2020.
[3] Lee H, et al. High resolution hyperpolarized 13C MRSI
using SPICE at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med, 2014.
[4] Guo R, et al. Simultaneous QSM and metabolic
imaging of the brain using SPICE: Further improvements in data acquisition and
processing. Magn Reson Med, 2021.
[5] Li Y, et al. Machine learning-enabled
high-resolution dynamic deuterium MR spectroscopic imaging. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging, 2021.
[6] Zhao Y, et al. Fast high-resolution 19F-MRSI of
perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions for MRI cell tracking using SPICE with learned
subspace. In Proc. of ISMRM, 2021.
[7] Chen Y, et al. Improved low-rank filtering of MR
spectroscopic imaging data with pre-learnt subspace and spatial constraints. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2019.
[8] Ma C, et al. Accelerated spectral-editing MRSI using subspace modeling, multi-slab acquisition and 3D CAIPIRINHA undersampling. In
Proc. of ISMRM, 2019.
[9] Li Y, et al. LearRning nonlineAr repResentatIon and
projectIon for faSt constrained MRSI rEconstruction (RAIISE). In Proc. of
ISMRM, 2022.
[10] Lam F, et al. Constrained magnetic resonance
spectroscopic imaging by learning nonlinear low-dimensional models. IEEE Trans
Med Imaging, 2020.
[11] Ruhm L, et al. 3D
31P MRSI of the human brain at 9.4 Tesla: Optimization and
quantitative analysis of metabolic images. Magn Reson Med, 2021.