0870

Fast MRSI Reconstruction Combining Linear and Nonlinear Manifold Models
Yahang Li1,2, Zepeng Wang 1,2, Aaron Anderson 2,3, Ruiyang Zhao 2,4, Paul Arnold 2,3, Graham Huesmann 2,3,5, and Fan Lam 1,2,4
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 2Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Urbaba, IL, United States, 3Neuroscience Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbaba, IL, United States, 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 5School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States

Synopsis

Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Spectroscopy

A computationally efficient MRSI reconstruction method is presented. The proposed problem formulation integrates a subspace model of the high-dimensional spatiotemporal function (SPICE) and a network-based learned projector on to a low-dimensional manifold of generic spectroscopic signals. The subspace representation allows for more flexible spatiotemporal sampling designs than using nonlinear manifold constraint alone, while the manifold constraint effectively regularizes the subspace fitting, especially at higher orders. An efficient algorithm is designed to solve the optimization problem. The benefits of the proposed synergy have been demonstrated using simulations as well as experimental 31P and 1H-MRSI data.

Introduction

Subspace imaging methods have demonstrated significantly improved tradeoffs in speed, resolution, and SNR for various MRSI applications1-8. Besides reducing the number of degrees-of-freedom, subspace models also allow for flexible temporal sampling (e.g., acquiring truncated or subNyquist FIDs for acceleration or rapid spatiospectral encoding), as the basis determines the spectral resolution (unlike the standard Fourier transform). Meanwhile, model order selection remains challenging. One solution is to choose a relaxed higher order for better model accuracy which increases the number of unknowns and worsens the conditioning of the fitting problem9,10. Recently, more efficient neural network (NN) based nonlinear low-dimensional models have shown great potential in improving MRSI reconstruction, e.g., the RAIISE method (joint leaRning of nonlineAr representatIon and projectIon for faSt constrained MRSI rEconstruction)9. However, this approach does not afford as flexible FID sampling design as subspace fitting. Here, we propose a novel method that integrates subspace modeling and nonlinear manifold-based regularization via a unified formulation, taking the advantage of both methods. A highly efficient algorithm leveraging ADMM and an NN-based learned manifold projector was developed to solve the associated optimization problem. We have evaluated our method using simulations as well as in vivo 31P-MRSI and 1H-MRSI data. High-fidelity, high-SNR reconstructions from noisy MRSI data can be produced with flexible FID sampling designs, demonstrating the proposed method's advantages over subspace or manifold model alone.

Theory: Problem Formulation and Algorithm

The key ingredients in the proposed method are: (1) A predetermined linear subspace to model the high-dimensional spatiotemporal/spatiospectral function (see1-8 for extensive discussion on subspace estimation); (2) Jointly learned NN-based nonlinear manifold of spectroscopic signals and a projector to recover the low-dimensional embeddings from noisy FIDs; and (3) A formulation combining (1) and (2). Specifically, we formulate the reconstruction as:$$\min_\mathbf{U,z}\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})\quad(1)\\s.t.\mathbf{UV}=D(\mathbf{z}),$$where $$$\mathbf{UV}$$$ is the subspace model ($$$\mathbf{V}$$$ containing the basis), $$$\mathbf{d}$$$ the $$$(k,t)$$$-space data, $$$\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}$$$ an encoding operator with $$$(k,t)$$$-sampling pattern $$$\Omega$$$, $$$\mathbf{B}$$$ models the B0 inhomogeneity, and $$$R(.)$$$ imposes complementary spatial regularization with parameter $$$\lambda$$$, e.g., $$$R(\mathbf{UV})=\|\mathbf{D}_w\mathbf{UV}\|_2$$$1. The constraint $$$\mathbf{UV}=D(\mathbf{z})$$$ enforces the prior that the underlying spectroscopic signal should yield a low-dimensional manifold embedding $$$\mathbf{z}$$$. $$$D(.)$$$ is a learned decoder/generator as part of the learned NN model (i.e., complex-valued autoencoder as described in the RAIISE method9). Note that the subspace model order can be higher (more accurate) with the nonlinear manifold regularization.
An ADMM-based algorithm was used to solve Eq. (1). The augmented Lagrangian function is:$$\boldsymbol{L}(\mathbf{U},\mathbf{z},\mathbf{Y})=\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})+\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{UV}-D(\mathbf{z})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2,$$where $$$\mathbf{Y}$$$ is the Lagrangian multiplier. The following three subproblems were solved iteratively ($$$i$$$ being the iteration index):
Subproblem (I): Update $$$\mathbf{U}$$$$$\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{U}}\|\mathbf{d}-\mathcal{F}_{\Omega}\{\mathbf{B}\odot\mathbf{UV}\}\|_2^2+\lambda R(\mathbf{UV})+\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{UV}-D(\mathbf{z}^{(i)})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2,$$which is the subspace fitting in SPICE with an additional regularization term.
Subproblem (II): Update $$$\mathbf{z}$$$$$\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\mu}{2}\|\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}-D(\mathbf{z})+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu}\|_{F}^2.$$
Directly solving this problem requires time-consuming backpropagation. Thus, we adapted the learned projection concept in RAIISE and reformulated subproblem (II) as:$$\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}=\min_{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\mu}{2}\|P(\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}+\frac{\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}}{\mu})-\mathbf{z}\|_{F}^2,$$where $$$P(.)$$$ is the learned manifold projector with $$$P(D(\mathbf{z}))=\mathbf{z}$$$.
Subproblem (III): Update $$$\mathbf{Y}$$$$$\mathbf{Y}^{(i+1)}=\mathbf{Y}^{(i)}+\mu(\mathbf{U}^{(i+1)}\mathbf{V}-D(\mathbf{z}^{(i+1)}))$$

Methods

The proposed method was evaluated using simulations and experimental data. For simulation, a 31P phantom was generated with a lesion-mimicking feature and noise added to $$$(k,t)$$$-space data (details in10).
In vivo 31P-MRSI data were acquired from a healthy volunteer on a Siemens Magnetom 9.4T system with: TR/TE = 250/1.3 ms, FOV = 180$$$\times$$$200$$$\times$$$180 mm3, matrix size = 28$$$\times$$$30$$$\times$$$13, spectral BW = 5000 Hz and 512 FID points11. The reconstruction used the first 256 points with $$$\times$$$2 undersampling (128 points in total) to demonstrate the ability of flexible sampling. 1H-MRSI data were acquired from a post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) patient on a Prisma 3T system using a 3D-EPSI sequence: TR/TE = 1000/65 ms, FOV = 220$$$\times$$$220$$$\times$$$64 mm3, matrix size = 42$$$\times$$$42$$$\times$$$8, spectral BW = 1087 Hz and 200 FID points. Reconstruction was performed at 512-pt FID length for a higher spectral resolution. All in vivo studies were IRB-approved.

Results

For simulation, we compared the proposed method with reconstructions using subspace (SPICE, model order 26 with 5% truncation error) or nonlinear manifold constraints (RAIISE) alone, from both temporally truncated (Fig. 1) and undersampled (Fig. 2) FIDs (shorter FID for SNR or shorter TRs, and undersampled FID mimicking EPSI acquisitions with large echo spacings due to gradient limits). As can be seen, SPICE-based reconstruction with a higher model order tends to overfit for truncated FIDs (Fig. 1), while the performance of RAIISE deteriorates substantially for undersampled data (Fig. 2). The proposed method produced the best reconstruction in both scenarios quantitatively (with MSE) and qualitatively, demonstrating its robustness for various sampling choices. In vivo 31P-MRSI reconstruction ($$$\times$$$2 truncation and $$$\times$$$2 undersampling) are shown in Fig. 3. Similarly, we can observe that both high order subspace and RAIISE yielded degraded reconstructions with over/under fitting issues, while the proposed method consistently achieved high-fidelity, high SNR reconstruction (Fig. 3; orange arrows indicating better-preserved spectral features revealed by truncated FIDs). Figures 4 and 5 show 1H-MRSI reconstruction from a PTE patient. The proposed method produced again better-quality spectra (Fig. 4) and tissue contrast with better lesion delineation (Fig. 5).

Summary

A novel MRSI reconstruction method that combines linear and nonlinear models was developed. Improved reconstructions from simulation and in vivo data with different FID sampling designs demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method and its potential for accelerated acquisitions.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by NSF-CBET-1944249 and NIH-NIBIB-1R21EB029076A

References

[1] Lam F, Liang Z-P. A subspace approach to high-resolution spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2014.

[2] Lam F, et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using SPICE with learned subspaces. Magn Reson Med, 2020.

[3] Lee H, et al. High resolution hyperpolarized 13C MRSI using SPICE at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med, 2014.

[4] Guo R, et al. Simultaneous QSM and metabolic imaging of the brain using SPICE: Further improvements in data acquisition and processing. Magn Reson Med, 2021.

[5] Li Y, et al. Machine learning-enabled high-resolution dynamic deuterium MR spectroscopic imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2021.

[6] Zhao Y, et al. Fast high-resolution 19F-MRSI of perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions for MRI cell tracking using SPICE with learned subspace. In Proc. of ISMRM, 2021.

[7] Chen Y, et al. Improved low-rank filtering of MR spectroscopic imaging data with pre-learnt subspace and spatial constraints. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2019.

[8] Ma C, et al. Accelerated spectral-editing MRSI using subspace modeling, multi-slab acquisition and 3D CAIPIRINHA undersampling. In Proc. of ISMRM, 2019.

[9] Li Y, et al. LearRning nonlineAr repResentatIon and projectIon for faSt constrained MRSI rEconstruction (RAIISE). In Proc. of ISMRM, 2022.

[10] Lam F, et al. Constrained magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging by learning nonlinear low-dimensional models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2020.

[11] Ruhm L, et al. 3D 31P MRSI of the human brain at 9.4 Tesla: Optimization and quantitative analysis of metabolic images. Magn Reson Med, 2021.

Figures

Fig 1: Simulation results with ×2 FID truncation: The gold standard, zero-padded Fourier reconstruction, and reconstructions from SPICE, RAIISE, and the proposed method are shown in different rows. MSEs are shown under each method label. The left panel shows the metabolite maps (i.e., PCr, α-ATP, PE), and the right panel compares spectra from gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and lesion and the corresponding error spectra. The proposed method produced the most accurate results, while SPICE-based reconstruction had an overfitting issue (see the red circle and black arrows).

Fig 2: Simulation results with ×2 FID undersampling (red arrow indicates aliasing feature): Same figure layout as in Fig. 1. SPICE works well with temporal undersampling, but RAIISE had noticeably larger errors. The proposed method again produced the best reconstruction. Black arrows indicate some spectral features not well captured by SPICE or RAIISE but better recovered by the proposed method synergizing both.

Fig 3: In vivo results of a 3D 31P-MRSI data. Fourier reconstruction from full noisy and truncated FIDs are shown in the 1st row. Results from different methods are shown in rows 2-4. Metabolite maps are shown on the left panel (institutional unit), while spatially-resolved spectra are shown on the right. Results from the proposed method exhibit the least distortion and overfitting (pointed out by the arrows). The orange arrows indicate spectral features revealed by the proposed method but buried under noise (1st row; spectra of truncated FID with better SNR but reduced resolution).

Fig 4: Results from in vivo 1H-MRSI of a PTE patient: The top panel shows the anatomical images across the 3D imaging volume with the red arrow indicating a lesion. The bottom panel compares a set of voxel spectra (locations marked in the anatomical images) from zero-padded Fourier reconstruction (Noisy), SPICE reconstruction (SPICE), and the proposed method (Proposed) in normal regions (1st row), and near-lesion regions (2nd row). Less spectral distortion and overfitting (black arrows; especially in the lesion) with significant SNR enhancement can be seen for the proposed method.

Fig 5: Metabolite maps of NAA, Cr, Cho, and Glx/Cr from SPICE reconstruction (left panel) and the proposed method (left panel) from the same dataset as Fig. 4. Results from Fourier reconstruction were omitted due to its poor SNR thus not able to reveal meaningful tissue-specific metabolite variations. Higher-quality metabolite maps and better lesion delineation (red circles) can be seen for the proposed method.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
0870
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/0870