Nicole I.C. Cappelletto1, Hany Soliman2, Casey Y. Lee1, Nadia D. Bragagnolo3, Biranavan Uthayakumar1, Arjun Sahgal2, Albert P. Chen4, Ruby Endre3, Nathan Ma5, William J. Perks5, Jay S. Detsky2, Chris Heyn6, and Charles H. Cunningham1,3
1Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4GE Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Keywords: Hyperpolarized MR (Non-Gas), Cancer, Treatment Response Prediction, Radiotherapy, Brain Metastases, Metabolism
Brain
metastases are increasingly being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery;
however, 20-30% of treated tumors locally recure post treatment. Hyperpolarized
[1-
13C]pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging (HP
13C MRI) is
an emerging metabolic imaging modality that measures key metabolic phenotypes indicative
of aggressive tumor phenotypes. Here we show that the pre-treatment tumor
13C-lactate to
13C-bicarbonate ratio – a marker of glycolysis and (indirectly)
oxidative phosphorylation – measured via HP [1-
13C]pyruvate MRI is a robust predictor
of local recurrence (AUC
ROC=0.95, p=0.0008; AUC
PRC=0.92) and
can inform treatment decisions should the model predict a non-response to SRS.
Introduction
Brain
metastases (BMs) complicate upwards of 40% of cancer patients1–4 and are commonly treated
with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), surgery, or a combination of the two1,5. Although SRS is an
effective treatment compared to whole brain radiotherapy, still 20-30% of BMs recur
locally6. In such cases,
an alternative radiation schedule or surgery may have been superior; however,
current response assessment methods rely on detecting changes in tumor volume, which
take 4-6 weeks to stabilize7. Functional
imaging modalities, on the other hand, have the potential to assess treatment
response pre-treatment or shortly following therapy initiation.
Hyperpolarized
[1-13C]pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C MRI)
is an emerging metabolic imaging modality that allows for a 104-fold
increase in the signal-to-noise ratio of key metabolites in vivo8,9 and the
interrogation of key metabolic reactions that 18F-flurodeoxyglucose
positron emission tomography cannot. The majority of HP 13C MRI
oncology studies have focused on pyruvate-to-lactate conversion to
measure glycolysis within tumors. Pyruvate, however, lies at a critical
branching point where it can either be converted to lactate or acetyl-CoA and
CO2 (producing bicarbonate – a surrogate for oxidative
phosphorylation in the brain, where conversion of acetyl-CoA to non-tricarboxylic
acid pathways is low)10,11. Thus, the
lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio provides an indirect means of measuring the
proportion of glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation. Using the lactate-to-bicarbonate
ratio is recommended over the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio when evaluating
treatment response to therapies inducing hypoxia12 – as in the case
with SRS where severe vascular damage occurs13. Two pre-clinical
glioma studies used HP 13C MRI to predict early anti-VEGF treatment
response and found the lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio predictive of response 48h
post treatment and correlated with survival11,14. Therefore, we
hypothesize that a high pre-treatment tumor lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio measured
in vivo with HP 13C MRI can predict non-responders to SRS.Methods
Written
informed consent was obtained from N=12 patients with BMs (M=18 tumors) under a
protocol approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board and Health Canada. A
0.43 mL/kg dose of 250 mM [1-13C]pyruvate was prepared in a sterile
fluid path and hyperpolarized in a GE SPINLab polarizer. Participants were scanned
using a GE MR750 3.0T MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) with their head secured
in the support of a standard 8-channel neurovascular receive array (Invivo
Inc.). [1-13C]pyruvate was intravenously injected at 4 mL/s,
followed by a 25 mL saline flush at 5 ml/s. A custom 13C birdcage
coil and 3D dual-echo echo-planar
imaging sequence was used to acquire time-resolved volumetric images of
pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate (5s temporal resolution; 1.5cm isotropic
spatial resolution; 24×24×36cm3 field of view)15. Following 13C
image acquisition, the 8-channel 1H neurovascular array was used to
acquire 1H T1-w, gadolinium (Gd) enhanced T1-w,
and T2-FLAIR images.
13C
image reconstruction was done in MATLAB (MathWorks Inc., MA). Time-resolved 13C
images were summed to compute the area under the curve (AUC) for pyruvate,
lactate and bicarbonate. Tumors were contoured by a radiation oncologist on T1-w
or T2-w images if Gd enhanced T1-w images were not
available. Mean metabolite signal was calculated for each tumor. Tumor response
was determined according to the RANO-BM criteria7. The predictive
power of 13C metabolite signals were compared to literature-derived Graded
Prognostic Assessment16 and clinical parameters, such as the
Karnofsky performance status (KPS), age, number of metastatic sites, number of
central nervous system (CNS) metastases, radiation dose, and tumor volume. Results & Discussion
Figure
1 demonstrates the differences in the three metabolite ratios and six clinical
parameters, between responding and non-responding tumors. The
lactate-to-bicarbonate (p=0.0008) and bicarbonate-to-pyruvate (p=0.03) ratios
were significantly different between the two groups (one-sided Mann Whitney U
Test, α=0.05). No other parameter was able to distinguish the two groups. Although
tumor volume approached statistical significance, it is known that larger
tumors do not respond well to single SRS doses; tumors are sent for surgical
resection or fractionated SRS.
To
assess the predictive power of the top performing metabolite ratios, receiver
operating characteristic curve (ROC) and precision recall curve (PRC) analysis
was conducted. The lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio established a robust predictive
model, returning an AUCROC=0.95 (p=0.0008) and optimal threshold
resulting in a true positive rate of 0.8 and false positive rate of 0 (Figure 2). The
statistical significance of this result was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U
Test17, with α=0.05. The
AUCPRC was also evaluated due to class imbalance; the AUCPRC
was still encouraging at 0.92 for lactate-to-bicarbonate. For the
bicarbonate-to-pyruvate ratio, the AUCROC was 0.78; the AUCPRC
gave a better estimate of the classifier’s accuracy, however, it was not
predictive (AUCPRC=0.43). Similarly, the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio
was not predictive.
Finally, combinations
of lactate, bicarbonate and pyruvate were assessed for their potential to differentiate
responders from non-responders. Preliminary analysis revealed high correlations
between the three metabolites (Figure 3), suggesting that using all
metabolites in a predictive classifier model may be redundant. Predictions
based off single metabolites have been explored by our group18,19, however, the
lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio outperforms these models. Overall, the
lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio outperforms select clinical parameters, single
metabolites models, and current radiomics based models20.Conclusions
The lactate-to-bicarbonate ratio of brain metastases is a robust predictive
marker of local recurrence and could inform treatment decisions for tumors
unlikely to respond to SRS. Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the following sources of
funding: The Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, NSERC:
RGPIN-2016-05566, and CIHR: CIHR PJT152928.References
1. Soliman
H, Das S, Larson DA, Sahgal A. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern
management of patients with brain metastases. Oncotarget.
2016;7(11):12318-12330. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7131
2. Nayak
L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Epidemiology of Brain Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep.
2012;14(1):48-54. doi:10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y
3. Barnholtz-Sloan
JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE. Incidence Proportions of
Brain Metastases in Patients Diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan
Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2865-2872.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149
4. Tsukada
Y, Fouad A, Pickren JW, Lane WW. Central nervous system metastasis from breast
carcinoma autopsy study. Cancer. 1983;52(12):2349-2354.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19831215)52:12<2349::AID-CNCR2820521231>3.0.CO;2-B
5. Tsao
MN, Rades D, Wirth A, et al. Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly
diagnosed brain metastasis(es): An American Society for Radiation Oncology
evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012;2(3):210-225.
doi:10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.004
6. Chao
ST, De Salles A, Hayashi M, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management
of Limited (1-4) Brain Metasteses: Systematic Review and International
Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline. Neurosurgery.
2018;83(3):345-353. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx522
7. Lin
NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases:
proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):e270-e278.
doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4
8. Wolber
J, Ellner F, Fridlund B, et al. Generating highly polarized nuclear spins in
solution using dynamic nuclear polarization. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res
Sect Accel Spectrometers Detect Assoc Equip. 2004;526(1-2):173-181.
doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.171
9. Ardenkjaer-Larsen
JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000
times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(18):10158-10163.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1733835100
10. Park
JM, Josan S, Grafendorfer T, et al. Measuring mitochondrial metabolism in rat
brain in vivo using MR Spectroscopy of hyperpolarized [2-13C]pyruvate. NMR
Biomed. 2013;26(10):1197-1203. doi:10.1002/nbm.2935
11. Park
JM, Spielman DM, Josan S, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C-lactate to 13C-bicarbonate
ratio as a biomarker for monitoring the acute response of anti-vascular
endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. NMR Biomed.
2016;29(5):650-659. doi:10.1002/nbm.3509
12. Julià-Sapé
M, Candiota AP, Arús C. Cancer metabolism in a snapshot: MRS(I). NMR Biomed.
2019;32(10):e4054. doi:10.1002/nbm.4054
13. Park
HJ, Griffin RJ, Hui S, Levitt SH, Song CW. Radiation-Induced Vascular Damage in
Tumors: Implications of Vascular Damage in Ablative Hypofractionated
Radiotherapy (SBRT and SRS). Radiat Res. 2012;177(3):311-327.
doi:10.1667/RR2773.1
14. Datta
K, Lauritzen MH, Merchant M, et al. Reversed metabolic reprogramming as a
measure of cancer treatment efficacy in rat C6 glioma model. Dadachova E, ed. PLOS
ONE. 2019;14(12):e0225313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225313
15. Geraghty
BJ, Lau JYC, Chen AP, Cunningham CH. Dual-Echo EPI sequence for integrated
distortion correction in 3D time-resolved hyperpolarized 13C MRI. Magn Reson
Med. 2018;79(2):643-653. doi:10.1002/mrm.26698
16. Sperduto
PW, Berkey B, Gaspar LE, Mehta M, Curran W. A New Prognostic Index and
Comparison to Three Other Indices for Patients With Brain Metastases: An
Analysis of 1,960 Patients in the RTOG Database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
2008;70(2):510-514. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.074
17. Grunkemeier
GL, Jin R. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of clinical risk
models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):323-326.
doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02870-3
18. Lee
CY, Soliman H, Bragagnolo ND, et al. Predicting response to radiotherapy of
intracranial metastases with hyperpolarized 13C MRI. J
Neurooncol. Published online March 19, 2021. doi:10.1007/s11060-021-03725-7
19. Cappelletto NIC, Soliman H, Lee CY, et al.
Evaluating hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate uptake for predicting response to
stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases. Paper presented at: 31st
Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; May 11, 2022; London,
UK.
20. Mouraviev
A, Detsky J, Sahgal A, et al. Use of radiomics for the prediction of local
control of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuro-Oncol.
2020;22(6):797-805. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa007