Yang Ji1, Wenchuan Wu1, Matthijs H. S. de Buck 1, Thomas Okell 1, and Peter Jezzard1
1Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Division, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Keywords: Blood vessels, Parallel Imaging
3D time-of-flight (TOF) can be used
to acquire a volume with high spatial resolution, making it a preferable
choice for depicting smaller vascular structures. However, 3D TOF requires long
acquisition times when acquiring multiple slabs and covering a large field of
view, especially for high spatial resolution imaging. To accelerate acquisition
and to improve image quality of TOF MRA, we developed an accelerated 3D
intracranial TOF MRA sequence with wave-encoding (referred to as 3D wave-TOF)
and evaluated two variants – wave-CAIPI and compressed-sensing wave
(CS-wave).
Introduction
TOF is a widely
used non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography technique, which utilizes
the magnetization difference between unsaturated spins of inflowing blood and saturated
stationary spins to enhance blood vessels 1. However, the main disadvantages of 3D-TOF
MRA are the long acquisition times when acquiring multiple slabs and covering a large
field of view, especially for high spatial resolution imaging. Wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-CAIPI) is an emerging
parallel imaging technique 2, which has been demonstrated to achieve highly
accelerated 3D volume imaging with low artifact and SNR penalties. In this
work, we evaluated the feasibility of combining 3D-TOF MRA with the wave-CAIPI
technique to accelerate imaging speed and to improve the imaging quality of the
cerebral vasculature. CS was also combined with wave-encoding (dubbed as
CS-wave), and the performance of both wave-CAIPI and CS-wave TOF was evaluated.Methods
Sequence implementation and data acquisition
A schematic diagram of the proposed 3D wave-TOF sequence is shown in
Figure 1A. The sequence was implemented based on a standard 3D-TOF sequence with
additional sinusoidal gradients applied in both phase and partition encoding directions. Figure
1B shows three 2D-CAIPI sampling patterns 3.
All MRI measurements were performed on a
3T Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma scanner. Retrospectively and prospectively undersampled datasets
were acquired using the proposed 3D wave-TOF and conventional Cartesian 3D-TOF
MRA. The common parameters used in sequences studied were as follows: matrix
size per slab = 256×256×44, resolution = 0.8×0.8×0.6 mm3, TR/TE=14/3.5
ms, flip angle = 20°, and bandwidth = 121 Hz/pixel. To avoid flow-related
artifacts caused by the wave-encoding gradients, several sets of the wave-encoding
parameters were evaluated and a cycle number (Ncyc) of 15
and wave amplitude (Gmax) of 10 mT/m were finally chosen for the wave-TOF
MRA protocol.
Reconstruction
Images were reconstructed offline from the raw k-space data with an
in-house program coded in MATLAB. Both retrospectively and prospectively
undersampled wave-CAIPI data were reconstructed by solving the following
minimization problem:$$min_s ‖M⋅F_z ⋅F_y⋅PSF(k_x,y,z)⋅F_x⋅C⋅s-k‖_2^2$$ where M is the mask of the 2D-CAIPI sampling pattern; Fx, Fy and Fz are
the Fourier transform operators; $$$PSF(k_x,y,z)$$$is the point spread function of the wave-encoding
gradients; C is the estimated coil sensitivity; s is the unknown image to be
reconstructed; and k is the undersampled wave-encoded k-space data. Similarly,
the undersampled Cartesian data were reconstructed using the SENSE algorithm,
but without the PSF term.
The images were then recovered
from the undersampled CS-wave dataset by solving the following optimization
problem 4,5:$$min_s ‖M⋅F_z ⋅F_y⋅PSF(k_x,y,z)⋅F_x⋅C⋅s-k‖_2^2+γ_G ‖G_s ‖_1+γ_W ‖W_s ‖_1$$where Gs and Ws denote the gradient and Haar wavelet
transforms of s, respectively. γG and γW are the regularization weights. Reconstruction
of the sub-sampled Cartesian dataset was performed with the CS algorithm, but without
the PSF term.
Image analysis
Contrast-to-background ratio (CBR) between cerebral arteries and tissue
background 6 in source images was measured to
evaluate the visibility of vessels over the background with various acceleration
approaches. we also adopted the vessel-masked structural similarity (SSIM) index
in addition to SSIM to assess the accuracy of the reconstruction from retrospectively
undersampling.
Results
Figure 2 shows the evolutions of the 0th and 1st order
moment of the wave-encoding gradient for different values of Ncyc
and Gmax during the readout period, along with a source image
of a representative slice and a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of a
slab obtained by the wave-TOF sequence.
To visualize
the performance of the wave-CAIPI technique in TOF MRA, comparisons between the images from accelerated wave-CAIPI TOF and conventional
TOF are shown in Figures 3A and 3B. As depicted in the figures, the wave-CAIPI technique
demonstrates its superiority for vessel contrast, and the robustness of
wave-CAIPI to noise is an obvious advantage compared to a conventional imaging
scheme.
Next, we exploit the integration of wave-encoding,
random sampling, and CS reconstruction with a sparsity prior (CS-wave) to further
accelerate the acquisition and improve the image quality of intracranial TOF
MRA. Figures 3C and 3D compare the results of retrospectively accelerated imaging
schemes using CS-wave and traditional CS for intracranial
TOF MRA.
Figure 4A shows an example of a MIP image and the corresponding vessel
mask which was used for calculating the CBR and the vessel-masked SSIM. Figure 4B shows the quantitative analyses of the CBR between
vessels and static tissue background. Figure 4C and 4D show the SSIM and
vessel-masked SSIM between the MIP images obtained
from the undersampled reconstruction and the reference dataset from the fully
sampled reconstruction without and with vessel masking, respectively.
Figure 5 shows an example of the whole-brain axial MIP
images obtained from all four slabs with various prospectively undersampled
schemes: wave-CAIPI, 2D-CAIPI, CS-wave, and conventional CS at various acceleration
factors. Visually, 2D-CAIPI performs the worst at high acceleration
factors with an obvious noisy background when compared with other
sampling schemes with the same acceleration factor.Discussion and Conclusion
The flow-related artifacts
caused by the wave-encoding gradient can be significantly suppressed by
decreasing the oscillation amplitude of the 1st order gradient moment. 3D wave-TOF improves the capability of accelerated MRA and provides better
image quality at higher acceleration factors compared to traditional PI- or CS-accelerated
TOF, suggesting the potential use of wave-TOF in cerebrovascular disease.Acknowledgements
This study was
supported by the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The Wellcome Centre
for Integrative Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from the Wellcome
Trust (203139/Z/16/Z). We also thank the Dunhill Medical Trust (PJ, MdB), Royal
Academy of Engineering (RF201819/18/92, WW) and grant support from Siemens
Healthineers (MdB). TO is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly
funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (220204/Z/20/Z).References
1. Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD. MR angiography by multiple thin slab
3D acquisition. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1991;17(2):434-451.
2. Bilgic B, Gagoski BA, Cauley SF, Fan AP, Polimeni JR, Grant PE, Wald
LL, Setsompop K. Wave‐CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2015;73(6):2152-2162.
3. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Mueller MF, Seiberlich N, Heidemann
RM, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging
(2D CAIPIRINHA). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2006;55(3):549-556.
4. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of
compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2007;58(6):1182-1195. 31.
5. Bilgic B, Ye H, Wald LL, Setsompop K. Simultaneous time interleaved
multislice (STIMS) for rapid susceptibility weighted acquisition. Neuroimage
2017;155:577-586.
6. Yamamoto T, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Fushimi Y, Stalder AF,
Natsuaki Y, Schmidt M, Togashi K. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography
with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction: comparison with
conventional parallel imaging for accelerated imaging. Investigative Radiology
2016;51(6):372-378.