Hongyan Liu1, Oscar van der Heide1, Edwin Versteeg1, Miha Fuderer1, Fei Xu1, Martijn Froeling2, Cornelis A.T. van den Berg1, and Alessandro Sbrizzi1
1Computational Imaging Group, Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiology, Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Quantitative Imaging
MR-STAT is
a framework for simultaneously acquiring multi-parametric
quantitative maps from one single short scan. In this work, we design a new 3D MR-STAT sequence and the corresponding two-step reconstruction strategy based on previous work. The framework is improved by designing a faster acquisition framework, and more accurate signal modeling for reconstruction. The proposed sequence takes 7 minutes after retrospectively undersampling, and is validated in a phantom experiment. Furthermore, we apply this 3D MR-STAT sequence the first time
for
musculoskeletal applications. Knee and lower-leg experiments
of healthy volunteers are shown here.
Introduction
MR-STAT is
a framework for simultaneously acquiring multi-parametric
quantitative maps from one single short scan1. MR-STAT computes
the quantitative tissue parameters, typically T1, T2 and proton
density (PD), by solving the following large-scale, nonlinear
optimization problem
$$ \alpha^* = \arg \min_\alpha || d - s(\alpha)||_2^2, (1)$$
where $$$s$$$ is
the measured k-space data, $$$\alpha$$$ encapsulates all the parameter
maps, and $$$s$$$ is the transient-state volumetric signal model. A
two-dimensional MR-STAT acquisition uses a gradient-spoiled sequence
with a smoothly varying flip-angle train and linear, Cartesian
readouts2.
Three-dimensional MR-STAT3, compared to 2D acquisitions, allows for an increased SNR and better through-plane resolution. Challenges of the 3D MR-STAT include a prelonged scan time for
high-resolution acquisition and the computational burden for accurate 3D
model-based reconstruction. To overcome these challenges, we improve our 3D MR-STAT framework based on the previous abstract3, by applying a new acceleration scheme to reduce scan time and optimizing the signal
model for accurate and fast quantitative reconstruction.
Currently MR-STAT has
primarily been demonstrated in brain4, however, quantitative
MRI is also
relevant for
evaluating pathological changes in muscle disorders and degenerative
joint diseases5,6. Therefore we apply the new 3D MR-STAT sequence for musculoskeletal applications in this work. The proposed new 3D sequence takes 7 minutes with retrospective undersampling, and is validated in a phantom experiment. In-vivo
feasibility is demonstrated in the knee (0.8x0.8x1.5mm^3
resolution) and lower-leg (1-mm isotropic resolution) of healthy
volunteers.Method
A 2D
MR-STAT acquisition consists of a Cartesian, gradient-spoiled,
gradient-echo sequence with smoothly varying flip-angles and linearly
increasing phase-encoding (ky) lines sequentially covering five
k-spaces.
A 3D MR-STAT sequence can be realized by repeating the 2D sequence as
short segments for all additional kz phase-encoding lines. In order
to reduce the scan time, an undersampling strategy is applied to both
phase-encoding directions, leading to a total undersampling factor of
4 [
Fig. 1(a)]. A
SENSE undersampling factor of 2 is realized in the ky direction,
which shortens the length of the 3D segments, and an additional
alternating 2-fold undersampling pattern is applied in the kz
direction, resulting into an overall under-sampling factor of 4.
The 3D
MR-STAT sequence was implemented on a 3T system (Philips, Elition) with
prospective ky-undersampling (R=2, dashed and solid bullets in
Fig.1(a)). The kz direction undersampling is applied retrospectively
(R=4, dashed bullets following the yellow trajectory).
The flip-angle train used for the 3D segments is shown in
Fig.1(b),
which consists of 4 sine-square lobes over 5 undersampled ky
phase-encoding lines
7. To allow for higher
T1 sensitivity
and SNR,
each 3D segment starts with an adiabatic inversion pulse and a
1.75-second waiting time is inserted between segments for
longitudinal signal recovery. Note that the 1.75s waiting time is not
sufficient for all spins to return to initial equilibrium states,
however after the initial 3 to 4 repetitions of the 3D segments, the
temporal MR signal responses remain stable for latter repetitions of different kz lines,
reaching to a “hyper steady-state”
8.
The 3D
MR-STAT sequence is tested on a Eurospin gel-tube phantom, a knee and
a lower-leg (healthy volunteers). All two-fold prospectively
under-sampled scans take 14 minutes(R=2) and are virtually
shortened to 7 minutes by retrospectively under-sampling(R=4). The
sequence parameters are summarized in
Table1. A 20-second low-resolution,
multi-slice B1 DREAM sequence is run for
B1
+ correction
9.
Reconstructing
the large-scale, 3D volumetric MR-STAT data directly using model (1)
can be extremely challenging in terms of computer memory and reconstruction time. In order to
overcome this problem, we split the 3D reconstruction in two
sub-steps: First, a 3D SENSE reconstruction is run for each of the 5
undersampled 3D k-space data to acquire the “fully-sampled”
k-space data. Subsequently, the “fully-sampled” k-space data are
decoupled along the kz direction such that the 3D problem is
decoupled into normal 2D MR-STAT
reconstruction
10, which takes approximately 3 to 5 minutes to reconstruct one slice. Note that in the first step, the undersampled transient-state k-space data are in a "hyper
steady-state" along the kz direction, and smoothly varying along the ky
direction, therefore making the 3D SENSE decoupling possible.
Results
Fig.2
shows the results for the gel phantom experiment. T1 and T2 values
computed from both 14-minute(R=2) and 7-minute(R=4) MR-STAT data
show high agreements with the gold standard results (computed from
inversion- recovery and single spin-echo scans). Noises measured from 7-minute reconstruction results are approximately 20% higher than the 14-minute results.
Fig.3
and Fig.4 show representative reconstructed
slices (sagittal and transverse) from the knee and lower-leg
experiment. Several ROIs (cartilage, muscle, fat, etc.) are manually
drawn on these 2D slices, and corresponding statistics are summarized
in Fig.3(c) and Fig.4(c), showing that the reconstructed values are
in the range of literature values11-14.Conclusion and Discussion
We
demonstrated that our 3D MR-STAT sequence can be used for acquiring
volumetric quantitative maps with high quality. The 7-minute
retrospectively undersampled sequence is demonstrated for knee and
lower-leg quantitative imaging. In the future we will prospectively
validate the accelerated 3D sequence, and higher acceleration rate and more efficient undersampling strategy will also be investigated. Multi-echo acquisition and multi-compartment reconstruction for water-fat separation will be subject of future work.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Sbrizzi, Alessandro, et al. "Fast
quantitative MRI as a nonlinear tomography problem." Magnetic
resonance imaging 46 (2018): 56-63.
[2]
van der Heide, Oscar, et al. "High‐resolution in vivo MR‐STAT
using a matrix‐free and parallelized reconstruction algorithm."
NMR in Biomedicine 33.4 (2020): e4251.
[3]
Liu, Hongyan, et al. “3D MR-STAT: towards a fast multi-parametric
protocol with increased SNR”. ISMRM (2022), # 1346.
[4] Kleinloog, Jordi PD, et al. "Synthetic
MRI with Magnetic Resonance Spin TomogrAphy in Time‐Domain (MR‐STAT):
Results from a Prospective Cross‐Sectional Clinical Trial." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2022).
[5]
Yao,
Weiwu, et al. "The application of T1 and T2 relaxation time and
magnetization transfer ratios to the early diagnosis of patellar
cartilage osteoarthritis." Skeletal
radiology 38.11
(2009): 1055-1062.
[6]
Carlier, Pierre G., et al. "Skeletal muscle quantitative nuclear
magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy as an outcome measure for
clinical trials." Journal of neuromuscular diseases 3.1 (2016):
1-28.
[7]
Fuderer,Miha, et al. “Efficient performance analysis and
optimization of transient-state sequences for multi-parametric MRI”.
NMR in Biomedicine (2022, accepted).
[8]
Amthor, Thomas, et al. "Magnetic resonance fingerprinting with
short relaxation intervals." Magnetic Resonance Imaging 41
(2017): 22-28.
[9]
Nehrke, Kay, and Peter Börnert. "DREAM—a novel approach for
robust, ultrafast, multislice B1 mapping." Magnetic resonance in
medicine 68.5 (2012): 1517-1526.
[10]
Liu, Hongyan, et al. "Acceleration Strategies for MR-STAT:
Achieving High-Resolution Reconstructions on a Desktop PC within 3
minutes." IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2022).
[11]
Marty, Benjamin, and Pierre G. Carlier. "Physiological and
pathological skeletal muscle T1 changes quantified using a fast
inversion-recovery radial NMR imaging sequence." Scientific
Reports 9.1 (2019): 1-9.
[12]
Schlaffke, Lara, et al. "Multi‐center evaluation of stability
and reproducibility of quantitative MRI measures in healthy calf
muscles." NMR in Biomedicine 32.9 (2019): e4119.
[13]
Gold, Garry E., et al. "Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation
times and image contrast." American Journal of Roentgenology
183.2 (2004): 343-351.
[14] Stokes, Ashley M., et al. "Enhanced refocusing of fat signals using optimized multipulse echo sequences." Magnetic resonance in medicine 69.4 (2013): 1044-1055.