Keywords: Spinal Cord, Software Tools
Ultra-High-Field MRI has opened new perspectives for spinal cord exploration due to improved spatial resolution and contrast. The present work proposes a dedicated 7T multimodal 3D qT1 and T2*w template and a parcellation including eight substructures within gray matter, thirty WM tracts and three inter-hemispheric ROIs, for an accurate atlas-based segmentation in the subject space. This atlas was interpolated in the 3D PAM50 space to benefit from the advanced functions for registration implemented in the SCT. A preliminary segmentation result in healthy subject gives promising perspectives for group studies.1. Barry, R. L., Vannesjo, S. J., By, S., Gore, J. C. & Smith, S. A. Spinal cord MRI at 7T. Neuroimage 168, 437–451 (2018).
2. Callot, V., Combes, A., Destruel, A. & Smith, S. Ultra-high Field Spinal Cord MRI. in Ultra-high Field Neuro MRI, Elsevier Inc. S&T Books (Amsterdam, NL), in press (2022).
3. Massire, A., Rasoanandrianina, H., Guye, M. & Callot, V. Anterior fissure, central canal, posterior septum and more: New insights into the cervical spinal cord gray and white matter regional organization using T1 mapping at 7T. Neuroimage 205, 116275 (2020).
4. Lévy, S. et al. White matter atlas of the human spinal cord with estimation of partial volume effect. NeuroImage 119, 262–271 (2015).
5. Gros, C. et al. Ex vivo MRI template of the human cervical cord at 80μm isotropic resolution. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of ISMRM (2020).
6. Hausman, L. Atlases of the Spinal Cord and Brainstem and the Forebrain. (Thomas, 1962).
7. Khan, Y. S. & Lui, F. Neuroanatomy, Spinal Cord. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2022).
8. De Leener, B. et al. PAM50: Unbiased multimodal template of the brainstem and spinal cord aligned with the ICBM152 space. NeuroImage 165, 170–179 (2018).
9. Medina, N. J. L., Gros, C., Cohen-Adad, J., Callot, V. & Le Troter, A. 2D Multi-Class Model for Gray and White Matter Segmentation of the Cervical Spinal Cord at 7T. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2110.06516.
10. De Leener, B. et al. SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 145, 24–43 (2017).
11. Gros, C. et al. Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage 184, 901–915 (2019).
12. Perone, C. S., Calabrese, E. & Cohen-Adad, J. Spinal cord gray matter segmentation using deep dilated convolutions. Sci Rep 8, 5966 (2018).
13. Avants, B. B. et al. The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations. NeuroImage 49, 2457–2466 (2010).
14. Fonov, V. S. et al. Framework for integrated MRI average of the spinal cord white and gray matter: The MNI-Poly-AMU template. Neuroimage 102, 817–827 (2014).
15. Ogier, A., Sdika, M., Foure, A., Le Troter, A. & Bendahan, D. Individual muscle segmentation in MR images: A 3D propagation through 2D non-linear registration approaches. in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 317–320 (IEEE, 2017). doi:10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036826.
16. Taso, M. et al. Construction of an in vivo human spinal cord atlas based on high-resolution MR images at cervical and thoracic levels: preliminary results. Magn Reson Mater Phy 27, 257–267 (2014).
17. Massire, A. et al. High-resolution multi-parametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord at 7T. NeuroImage 143, 58–69 (2016).
18. Taso, M. et al. A reliable spatially normalized template of the human spinal cord--Applications to automated white matter/gray matter segmentation and tensor-based morphometry (TBM) mapping of gray matter alterations occurring with age. Neuroimage 117, 20–28 (2015).
Fig.1 : 2D template construction steps
1. (a) 3D MP2RAGE and (b) 2D T2*w acquisitions. 2. Cord and GM segmentation, followed by L/R flipping (blue color). Multi-stage SyGN13 processes using SyN transformation were then performed (pink color), for each level, using stacks of qT1 images (composed of multiple images per level for each individual subject) for the 2D AMU26qT1 template, and sets of T2*w image stack for the 2D AMU72T2*w template.
Fig.2 : Post-processing pipeline for the generation of 3D AMU7T atlas
1. (a) slice-wise co-registration steps between AMU spaces and PAM50 (b) automatic 3D label propagation through 2D fields of deformations (c) scheme and legend of WM/GM parcellation 2. Qualitative atlas comparison - in-vivo - ex-vivo - histology (a) in-vivo 3T PAM50 (500μm iso) (b) in-vivo AMU7T (175μm iso) (c) ex-vivo MRI template (80μm iso)
Fig.3 : Qualitative and quantitative results of an automated AMU7T segmentation on one single subject – impact of registration bias
1. on left: sagittal and coronal views of 3D MP2RAGE and labeled mask of cervical levels, on right: axial views at different levels (c2,c4,c6) of AMU7T automated segmentations (a) from SCT default registration (b) from SCT + optimized SyN registration 2. boxplot representation of mean/stdev qT1 values for each hemisphere (a) from SCT default registration (b) from SCT + optimized SyN registration