Yoonseok Choi1, Mohammed A Al-masni2, Hyeok Park1, Jun-ho Kim1, Dong-Hyun Kim1, and Roh-Eul Yoo3
1Yonsei University, SEOUL, Korea, Republic of, 2Sejong Univiersity, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors, Brain
Accurately segmenting
contrast-enhancing brain tumors plays an important role in surgical planning of
high-grade gliomas. Also, precisely stratifying malignancy risk within non-enhancing
T2 hyperintense area helps control the radiation dose according to the malignancy
risk and prevent normal brain tissue from being unnecessarily exposed to
radiation. In this work, we 1) segment brain tumors using deep learning, and 2)
provide more detailed segmentation results that can show the malignancy risk within
the T2 high region. We utilize a two-stage framework where we make images with
restricted ROI through foreground cropping so that the model can focus on only tumor part.
Introduction
Following the surgical
excision of contrast-enhancing tumors, radiation therapy is usually
administered to treat residual infiltrative tumor cells within non-enhancing T2
hyperintense areas in high-grade gliomas1. Thus, it is crucial to accurately differentiate
high-grade tumor clusters (with high malignancy risk) from low-grade or edema
components (with relatively lower malignancy risk) among the non-enhancing T2
hyperintense area in order to improve the efficiency of radiation treatment,
while minimizing radiation-induced side effects due to unwanted radiation exposure
to the normal tissue. Conventional thresholding methods may be used to decide
the malignancy risk within the non-enhancing T2 hyperintense area. However, such
approaches show a lot of failure at the boundary of the Edema (ED) region as
shown in the second column of Fig 4, which results in laborious manual corrections to the clinicians. To
tackle this deficiency, we propose a two-stage framework that can show the
level of tumor malignancy using Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T1
Contrast-Enhanced (T1CE), Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), and Cerebral
Blood Volume (CBV). This can assist to irradiate an appropriate amount of
radiation according to the malignancy risk when performing radiation therapy
for the residual non-enhancing T2 hyperintense area.Methods
[Proposed Framework]
We
designed a two-stage framework to segment not only brain tumors but also their
malignancy. To this end, we trained the first stage network (NWT) to
predict only the Whole Tumor (WT) region using FLAIR and T1CE, which have the
most informative information about the tumor2. The input images of the second stage
are voxel-wisely multiplied with the segmented WT mask. After that, we set the
window size to 128 and crop the foreground of the images so that the network
can better focus on the tumor. Note that FLAIR and T1CE are utilized as inputs
to the tumor network (NTU), while FLAIR, T1CE, ADC, and CBV are used
as inputs to the malignancy network (NMAL). We normalized all 3D
input images utilizing zero mean and unit standard deviation. Note that ADC and
CBV images were employed as additional inputs of NMAL because they
have beneficial features in determining the malignancy risk within the T2 high
region3. An overview of the proposed two-stage
framework and the employed dataset are illustrated in Fig 1.
The proposed framework employed a total of three
networks: NWT, NTU, and NMAL, which have
the same structure except for the number of input channels. We used an
optimized nnU-Net, which has shown excellent performance in the recent
segmentation tasks. In addition, the deep supervision concept4 is applied to the last three resolutions of each
decoder. A detailed description of the network structure is presented in Fig 2.Results
This
section shows the brain tumor and malignancy segmentation performance of the
proposed two-stage framework on 20 patients of the local Seoul National University
Hospital (SNUH) dataset. NWT in the first stage achieved an overall
Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 94.28% for the WT mask. We illustrate a
comparison of the quantitative malignancy risk segmentation performances for two
methods in Fig 3. These boxplots present the DSC for
each class of malignancy risk segmentation. NMAL was able to learn
beneficial features related to tumor malignancy from ADC and CBV images as well
as FLAIR and T1CE, leading to achieving enhanced results in the malignancy risk segmentation
task. NMAL achieved promising results in malignancy risk segmentation
with DSC improvement rates of 12.29%, 10.24%, 10.11%, and 7.37% on ED, ADC Low,
CBV High, and ADC Low
CBV High class, respectively, compared to the
conventional thresholding method.
Fig 4 illustrates some
examples of the malignancy risk segmentation results of NMAL and
conventional method compared to the label. This figure obviously presents how
the proposed approach can significantly improve the segmentation quality. Especially,
NMAL dramatically reduces the errors that appear a lot at the
boundary of the ED. Furthermore, Fig 4 shows how malignant the tumors are based on the
results of malignancy risk segmentation divided into three levels. Fig 5 delineates that high-quality tumor segmentation is
also possible in the proposed framework.Discussion
The
experimental results demonstrated the consequence of utilizing deep learning
for malignancy risk segmentation to reduce errors occurring at the boundary of
ED. The conventional thresholding method was good at distinguishing malignancy
for tumor cells located near the ET, but the problem was that it showed many
errors at the boundary of the ED. NMAL in the proposed two-stage
framework overcomes this issue, resulting in a more accurate classification of the
malignancy risk within the non-enhancing T2 high region in high-grade gliomas.
The main
limitation of this work is that even though the proposed two-stage framework
was beneficial to improve malignancy segmentation by employing deep learning, given
that the performance of malignancy risk segmentation is lower than that of
tumor segmentation, it seems difficult for the model to extract the features
necessary to stratify the malignancy risk within T2 hyperintensity.Conclusion
In this
work, we present not only contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor
segmentation for surgical planning, but also malignancy risk segmentation
within residual T2 hyperintensity, which may enable risk-adapted radiotherapy
planning.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the
Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry
and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea, the
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 202011D23) and by the
MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology
Research Center) support program(IITP-2022-2020-0-01461) supervised by the
IITP(Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning &
Evaluation).References
1 Mazzara, G. P., Velthuizen, R. P.,
Pearlman, J. L., Greenberg, H. M. & Wagner, H. Brain tumor target volume
determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI
segmentation. International Journal of
Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics 59,
300-312 (2004).
2 Zhou, T., Canu, S., Vera, P. &
Ruan, S. Latent correlation representation learning for brain tumor
segmentation with missing MRI modalities. IEEE
Transactions on Image Processing 30,
4263-4274 (2021).
3 Sadeghi, N. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebral blood volume in
brain gliomas: relation to tumor cell density and tumor microvessel density
based on stereotactic biopsies. American
journal of neuroradiology 29,
476-482 (2008).
4 Zhu, Q., Du, B.,
Turkbey, B., Choyke, P. L. & Yan, P. in 2017
international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). 178-184 (IEEE).