Jesse Ian Hamilton1,2, Gastao Lima da Cruz1, Imran Rashid3,4, Sanjay Rajagopalan3,4, and Nicole Seiberlich1,2
1Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 2Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 3Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States, 4Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: MR Fingerprinting/Synthetic MR, Cardiovascular, Quantitative Imaging
This work introduces a self-supervised
deep learning reconstruction for cine Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting,
allowing for simultaneous cardiac phase-resolved T
1, T
2,
and M
0 mapping (without motion correction or averaging of data
across different phases) and bright-blood and dark-blood cine imaging during a
10-second breathhold, with a temporal resolution (24 phases) comparable to
standard cine imaging. Results are presented in simulations using the XCAT
phantom and in healthy subjects, where the proposed
reconstruction yielded reduced noise, undersampling artifacts, and motion blurring
compared to previous low-rank and motion-corrected methods.
Introduction
Previous work with cine Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting
(MRF) (1,2)
employed nonrigid cardiac motion correction that may be prone to errors since
images have low SNR, residual aliasing, and variable contrasts. Motion
correction may also preclude measurement of dynamic T1-T2
changes. This study proposes an improved cine MRF reconstruction using a
deep image prior for true cardiac phase-resolved (without motion correction/averaging)
T1, T2, and M0 mapping and bright/dark-blood cine
imaging.
Methods
Acquisition/Reconstruction: Data were acquired
using a FISP readout with 4-15° flip angles, periodic inversions/T2-preparations,
and 1820 TRs during a 10-second breathhold similar to previous work (2). Data were retrospectively
gated to 24 cardiac phases using the ECG signal. One dictionary was precomputed for
all subjects using a Bloch equation simulation with corrections for slice
profile and preparation efficiency (3).
This study generalizes a deep image prior (DIP)
reconstruction first proposed for diastolic MRF mapping (4,5).
Training is performed de novo for each scan, without additional
training data (Figure 1). Network 1 (u-net) generates images in a
low-dimensional subspace derived from the SVD-compressed dictionary. The input
is a random noise tensor (one per cardiac phase); these are randomly initialized
for the first and last phases and linearly interpolated for intermediate
phases. Network 1 is updated by simulating the forward encoding model and
minimizing the MSE loss compared to the acquired density-compensated k-space
data. In parallel, subspace images are input to Network 2 (fully-connected) to
generate quantitative maps. Network 2 is updated by using the maps to calculate
synthetic images that are compared to images generated by Network 1; this step is
performed efficiently using a pre-trained “fingerprint generator” (Network 3) instead
of a Bloch simulation. Subspace images corresponding to the 2nd and 3rd
singular values are used as bright/dark-blood cine images.
Simulations: Data were simulated using the XCAT
phantom (6)
with 8-channel sensitivity maps and 60bpm cardiac motion. Two scenarios were tested:
(Scenario 1) constant myocardial T1=1050ms and T2=50ms,
and (Scenario 2) periodic variations every cardiac cycle with T1
1050-1150ms and T2 40-50ms. Cine MRF maps were reconstructed using three
methods: (LR) a low-rank subspace reconstruction with total variation penalties along spatial and
cardiac phase dimensions, (LR-MOCO) LR followed by
nonrigid motion correction as in (2), and (DIP) the proposed
method. RMSE values were computed relative to ground truth maps
In Vivo: Six healthy subjects were scanned at
1.5T (Sola, MAGNETOM Siemens) at a mid-ventricular slice. Cine MRF data (1.5x1.5x8
mm3, 192x192 matrix) were reconstructed using LR, LR-MOCO, and DIP. Diastolic
maps were separately acquired using MRF with prospective triggering and reconstructed
using a deep image prior (5). MOLLI (7) and T2-prepared
bSSFP (8) maps and reference bSSFP cine images
(FA 75°, TR/TE 4.2/2.4ms, 25 phases, 7s
breathhold) were collected. T1 and T2 in the left
ventricular (LV) septum were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests with
Bonferroni post-hoc corrections, with T1/T2 measured at
peak diastole and systole for cine MRF. Single-slice ejection fraction (EF) was
assessed using a Bland-Altman test. In one subject, scans were collected over
multiple short-axis slices to compare end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic
volume (ESV), and EF over the entire LV.Results
DIP yielded the lowest RMSE in simulations (Figure 2).
For Scenario 1 (constant T1-T2), RMSE values averaged over
all phases were: LR (6.6% T1, 15.0% T2), LR-MOCO (3.0% T1,
9.0% T2), and DIP (0.9% T1, 1.6% T2). For
Scenario 2, DIP detected dynamic T1-T2 changes, although
it overestimated the minimum T2 and underestimated the maximum T1.
DIP outperformed LR and LR-MOCO, the latter incorrectly estimating constant T1-T2
over all phases.
Figure 3 shows quantitative maps using cine MRF with
different reconstructions. LR exhibited noise enhancement, while LR-MOCO
reduced noise at the expense of motion blurring. DIP yielded the best
suppression of noise and undersampling artifacts with minimal blurring. Mean T1
values over all subjects (Figure 4) were: MOLLI (1008ms), ECG-triggered
MRF (1052ms), cine MRF with DIP (diastole 1077ms, systole 1076ms). Mean T2:
T2-prep bSSFP (48.1ms), ECG-triggered MRF (39.8ms), cine MRF with
DIP (diastole 37.9ms, systole 38.2ms). MOLLI T1 was significantly
lower than cine MRF. T2-prep bSSFP values were significantly higher than both MRF scans.
Single-slice EF using cine MRF with DIP agreed with reference values (mean bias
-0.3%; 95% limits of agreement -4.3% to 3.8%). Figure 5 shows a short-axis
stack in one subject with EDV 179mL, ESV 48mL, LVEF
73.1% for cine MRF and EDV 198mL, ESV 59mL, LVEF 70.3% for the reference.Discussion and Conclusions
This study proposed a self-supervised deep learning reconstruction
for cine MRF that reduced noise and undersampling artifacts compared to previous
low-rank reconstructions. Cardiac phase-resolved maps (without motion
correction or registering images over different phases) and multi-contrast cine
images were acquired in a single breathhold. While this study used subspace
images directly as bright/dark-blood images, synthetic contrasts could be
simulated from tissue property maps. This work may enable streamlined exams by assessing
function and tissue properties during an all-in-one approach. A current limitation
is the 8-hour computation time on a GPU. Future work will include validation in
patients expected to have abnormal T1/T2 and cardiac function,
comparison to the generalized low-rank reconstruction proposed in (9),
and exploration of potential changes in T1-T2 over the
cardiac cycle.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Michigan Institute for Clinical &
Health Research (MICHR) Grant UL1TR002240, Siemens Healthineers, and National
Institutes of Health / National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI)
R01HL163030 and R01HL153034.References
1. Jaubert O, Cruz G, Bustin
A, et al. Free-running cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Joint T1/T2
map and Cine imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;68:173–182.
2. Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Eck B, Griswold M, Seiberlich N. Cardiac cine
magnetic resonance fingerprinting for combined ejection fraction, T1 and T2
quantification. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4323.
3. Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Ma D, et al. Investigating and reducing the
effects of confounding factors for robust T1 and T2 mapping with cardiac MR
fingerprinting. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;53:40–51.
4. Ulyanov D, Vedaldi A, Lempitsky V. Deep Image Prior. In: Proceedings of
the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition. IEEE Computer Society; 2018. pp. 9446–9454.
5. Hamilton JI. A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Reconstruction for
Shortening the Breathhold and
Acquisition Window in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting. Front.
Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:928546.
6. Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BMW. 4D XCAT phantom
for multimodality imaging research. Med. Phys. 2010;37:4902–4915.
7. Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins DM, Sivananthan MU,
Ridgway JP. Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution
T1 mapping of the heart. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:141–146.
8. Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A, et al. T2 quantification for improved
detection of myocardial edema. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2009;11.
9. Cruz G, Qi H, Jaubert O, et al. Generalized low-rank nonrigid
motion-corrected reconstruction for MR fingerprinting. Magn. Reson. Med.
2022;87:746–763.