Paul Han1,2, Thibault Marin1,2, Yue Zhuo1,2, Jinsong Ouyang1,2, Georges El Fakhri1,2, and Chao Ma1,2
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Arterial spin labelling, Perfusion, Brain
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a
non-invasive MRI technique that allows to quantitatively measure cerebral blood
flow. However, the major limitation of ASL is in the intrinsically low
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence
has been proposed to mitigate this limitation, however, bSSFP is sensitive to
off-resonance effects. ASL perfusion imaging with bSSFP can be sensitive to
effects from motion and flow when Cartesian sampling scheme is used. This work
proposes and investigates radial sampling scheme for ASL with bSSFP to allow perfusion
imaging with relatively high SNR and robustness to motion and off-resonance
effects.
Introduction
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a
non-invasive MRI technique that allows to quantitatively measure cerebral blood
flow. Despite the advantages and usefulness, the major disadvantage of ASL is
in the intrinsically low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that it can provide.
Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP), a sequence that is known to
provide the highest SNR per unit time1, has been proposed for ASL
perfusion imaging2,3 with great potential to mitigate this
limitation. However, bSSFP is sensitive to off-resonance effects which results
in banding artifacts in regions with severe B0 inhomogeneity1. Also, ASL perfusion imaging with bSSFP can be
sensitive to effects from motion and flow when Cartesian sampling scheme is used3. In this work, we propose radial
sampling scheme for ASL perfusion imaging with bSSFP. The usefulness of radial
sampling scheme is demonstrated for ASL perfusion imaging with bSSFP via in
vivo studies from healthy volunteers.Methods
In
vivo experiments were performed using a 3T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens
Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) with body-coil for signal transmission and
32-channel head coil for signal reception. The study protocol was approved by our
local Institutional Review Board. ASL perfusion imaging was performed using pseudo-continuous
ASL (pCASL) labeling scheme4,5 and background suppression (BS)6
with the following parameters: labeling duration=1.5s; post-labeling delay
(PLD)=1.5s; labeling plane= 8.5cm inferior to the anterior commissure-posterior
commissure (AC-PC) line; Hanning window-shaped RF pulse; B1 average=1.63$$$\mu$$$T;
average labeling gradient=1.0mT/m; slice-selective labeling gradient=6.0mT/m; and
unbalanced tagging scheme. The general imaging parameters for bSSFP were: TR/TE=4∕2 ms; flip
angle=30$$$^{\circ}$$$; receiver bandwidth=592Hz/pixel; and RF phase increment ($$$\triangle\phi$$$)$$$=\pi/2$$$,
unless otherwise noted. For all studies, a single scan without pCASL labeling
and BS was additionally acquired for quantification of the perfusion signal.
A 2D perfusion imaging study was performed to
compare the differences between bSSFP and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR)
sequences with Cartesian and radial sampling schemes. The common imaging
parameters were: field-of-view (FOV)=240$$$\times$$$240 and 180$$$\times$$$180mm2 for Cartesian
and radial sampling schemes, respectively; resolution=1.875$$$\times$$$1.875mm2;
slice thickness=5mm; acquisition time per imaging session=3.8min; and number of
imaging sessions=3. The imaging parameters specific to SPGR were: TR/TE=4/1.7ms;
flip angle=10$$$^{\circ}$$$; and receiver bandwidth=1400Hz/pixel.
To investigate the performance with respect to
respiratory-related motion, a 3D perfusion imaging study was performed using segmented
3D acquisitions of bSSFP following Cartesian and stack-of-stars sampling trajectory
(Fig.1), with and without controlled breathing strategy7. In the case of
controlled breathing, subjects were instructed to breathe voluntarily while
holding their breath at times of image acquisitions. The remaining
imaging parameters of bSSFP were: FOV=240$$$\times$$$240$$$\times$$$120 and 180$$$\times$$$180$$$\times$$$120mm3 for Cartesian
and radial sampling schemes, respectively; resolution = 1.875$$$\times$$$1.875$$$\times$$$5mm3;
and acquisition time= 4.6min.
To investigate the feasibility and effect of
combining with phase-cycling technique, a 3D perfusion imaging study was
performed using segmented 3D acquisitions of bSSFP following stack-of-stars
sampling trajectory (Fig.1), with and without phase-cycling. Additional linear
gradient of 100 $$$\mu$$$T/m was applied along the right-left direction after
shimming to induce banding artifacts along the direction. The remaining imaging
parameters of bSSFP were: FOV=180$$$\times$$$180$$$\times$$$60mm3; resolution=1.875$$$\times$$$1.875$$$\times$$$5mm3;
and acquisition time=4.6min. In case of phase-cycling, phase-cycled images were
acquired with $$$\triangle\phi=0$$$,$$$\pi/2$$$,$$$\pi$$$,$$$3\pi/2$$$ and were
combined using a nonlinear averaging method8.
To investigate the feasibility of accelerating the
imaging time, additional 3D perfusion imaging study was performed using segmented
3D acquisition of bSSFP following stack-of-stars sampling trajectory (Fig.1).
The remaining imaging parameters of bSSFP were: FOV=180$$$\times$$$180$$$\times$$$120mm3; resolution =
1.875$$$\times$$$1.875$$$\times$$$5mm3; and acquisition time=2.3min and
1.15 min for full and under-sampled cases, respectively. In case of under-sampling,
data was prospectively under-sampled with reduction factor (R) of 2. Image reconstruction was performed by solving
the following optimization problem:
$$ \arg\min_{x}\parallel\Omega\mathcal{F}Sx-y\parallel^2_2+\lambda
TV(x)$$
where $$$x$$$ denotes the reconstructed
image, $$$\Omega$$$ denotes the sampling
mask, $$$\mathcal{F}$$$ denotes the spatial Fourier transform, $$$S$$$ denotes
the coil sensitivity, $$$y$$$ denotes the measured k-space data, $$$\lambda$$$ denotes the regularization
parameter, and $$$TV(\cdot)$$$ denotes total variation regularization9.
Non-uniform fast Fourier transform (NuFFT)10 was used for $$$\mathcal{F}$$$. The optimization problem was solved using SENSE-based reconstruction
algorithm11,12 with alternating direction method of multipliers
(ADMM)13.Results and Discussion
ASL with
bSSFP showed higher spatial and temporal SNRs of the perfusion signal compared
to those with SPGR (Fig.2). Cartesian and radial sampling schemes showed similar
performance in terms of spatial and temporal SNRs of the perfusion signal, regardless
of the imaging sequence (Fig.2).
ASL perfusion imaging with bSSFP and Cartesian sampling scheme was sensitive to
effects from respiratory-related motion, resulting in artifacts in the
perfusion-weighted images (Fig.3a). In comparison, ASL perfusion imaging with
bSSFP and radial sampling scheme was robust to these effects (Fig.3b). Banding
artifacts were observed in the images from the single RF phase incremented
bSSFP acquisitions when additional linear gradient was applied after shimming
(Fig.4). Effects from these artifacts were significantly reduced when
phase-cycling technique was used (Fig.4). Perfusion-weighted images were
successfully reconstructed from under-sampled acquisition, demonstrating the
feasibility of accelerating the imaging time for pCASL-bSSFP with radial
sampling (Fig.5).Conclusion
ASL with bSSFP and radial sampling scheme allows
perfusion imaging with relatively high SNR and robustness to motion. Additional
robustness to off-resonance effects can be achieved by employing phase-cycling
technique. Imaging time of the proposed method can be accelerated with the help
of under-sampling and image reconstruction.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health
(P41EB022544, R01CA165221, R01HL137230, T32EB013180, and K01EB030045).References
1. Scheffler, Klaus, and Stefan Lehnhardt. "Principles and
applications of balanced SSFP techniques." European
radiology 13.11 (2003): 2409-2418.
2. Park, Sung-Hong, Danny JJ Wang, and Timothy Q. Duong. "Balanced
steady state free precession for arterial spin labeling MRI: initial experience
for blood flow mapping in human brain, retina, and kidney." Magnetic
resonance imaging 31.7 (2013): 1044-1050.
3. Han, Paul Kyu, et al. "Whole‐brain perfusion imaging with
balanced steady‐state free precession arterial spin labeling." NMR in
biomedicine 29.3 (2016): 264-274.
4. Wu, Wen‐Chau, et al. "A theoretical and experimental
investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin
labeling." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 58.5 (2007):
1020-1027.
5. Dai, Weiying, et al. "Continuous flow‐driven inversion for
arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient
fields." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60.6 (2008):
1488-1497.
6. Maleki, Nasim, Weiying Dai, and David C. Alsop. "Optimization of
background suppression for arterial spin labeling perfusion
imaging." Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and
Medicine 25.2 (2012): 127-133.
7. Robson, Philip M., et al. "Strategies for reducing respiratory
motion artifacts in renal perfusion imaging with arterial spin
labeling." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61.6 (2009):
1374-1387.
8. Elliott, Andrew M., et al. "Nonlinear averaging reconstruction
method for phase-cycle SSFP." Magnetic resonance imaging 25.3
(2007): 359-364.
9. Chambolle, Antonin. "An algorithm for total variation
minimization and applications." Journal of Mathematical imaging and
vision 20.1 (2004): 89-97.
10. Fessler, Jeffrey A., and Bradley P. Sutton. "Nonuniform fast
Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation." IEEE transactions on
signal processing 51.2 (2003): 560-574.
11. Pruessmann, Klaas P., et al. "SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42.5 (1999): 952-962.
12. Pruessmann, Klaas P., et al. "Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k‐space trajectories." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 46.4 (2001): 638-651.
13. Boyd, Stephen, et al. "Distributed optimization and statistical
learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers." Foundations
and Trends® in Machine learning 3.1 (2011): 1-122.