Zhiliang Wei1,2, Hongshuai Liu3, Zixuan Lin1, Minmin Yao3, Ruoxuan Li3, Chang Liu3, Yuguo Li1,2, Jiadi Xu1,2, Wenzhen Duan3,4, and Hanzhang Lu1,2,5
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Arterial spin labelling, Animals
Blood-brain barrier
(BBB) plays a critical role in brain health and diseases. However, there is a
scarcity of tools to assess BBB integrity, particularly in mouse models. Here, we aimed to develop a non-contrast arterial-spin-labeling-based
MRI technique to estimate BBB permeability in mice by measuring relative
fractions of labeled water in cerebral veins. Systematic optimizations were
performed to enhance signal sensitivity with a further study investigating
reproducibility. The proposed method revealed significant BBB dysfunctions in a
mouse model of Huntington’s disease, which were further validated with
histology. Our method may open new
avenues for preclinical mechanistic research or therapeutic trails.
INTRODUCTION
Blood-brain barrier
(BBB), which plays important roles in blocking toxins and regulating fluid transportations, is a promising
biomarker for normal aging and several neurological disorders.1-3
Dynamic
contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is a commonly used method for evaluating BBB
function.4 However, its sensitivity in studying diseases with subtle BBB damages
at the early stage, e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, is limited. Alternatively, approaches
based on arterial-spin-labeling (ASL) MRI have been proposed to investigate the
BBB’s permeability to water5,6 and were applied in
disease studies2,7. In this work, we aim
to develop a non-contrast MRI technique to estimate BBB permeability to water
in mice by measuring arterially labeled water in major veins, similar to the
principle of water-extraction-with-phase-contrast-arterial-spin (WEPCAST)5 MRI. We optimized the sequence in terms of labeling duration and
post-labeling delay. Test-retest reproducibility was characterized. An initial
application of the proposed technique to a mouse model of Huntington’s disease
(HD) was performed to demonstrate the utility of the proposed method in
pathological conditions, which was further validated with histology.METHODS
BBB permeability can be
defined as the permeability surface-area product (PS) per unit-mass tissue (Renkin-Crone
model8,9):
$$PS=-ln(1-E)×CBF, (1)$$
where CBF denotes cerebral blood
flow (by phase-contrast [PC] MRI) and E denotes water extraction
fraction (by ASL signals at vein). Analogous to WEPCAST,5 ASL signals at vein are:$${\Delta}M_{vein}(t)=2{\alpha}(1-E)M_{0,blood}e^{-\frac{BAT_{vein}}{T_{1b}}}c(t), (2) $$ where α denotes inversion efficiency, M0,blood the blood equilibrium
magnetization (by M0 scan at long TR), BATvein
the bolus arrival time of vein, T1b the blood T1,
and c(t) the arterial input function (a step function convolved with a Gaussian
function to account for bolus dispersion). Therefore, a complete PS measurement
requires a PC MRI scan and a venous-ASL scan.
All experiments were
approved by local IACUC. A total of 41 mice (17 female 24 male; age: 14-44
weeks; body weight: 21-40g) were included in four sub-studies.
Study 1: Estimation of BATvein in mice (N=5). Eq. (2) requires the knowledge of BATvein, which has not been
elucidated before. Therefore, Study 1 aims to measure BATvein. ASL (sagittal slice covering brain midline) was
performed with a short labeling duration (500ms) and multiple post-labeling
delays (PLDs) (25,100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900,1000 ms) to estimate BATvein. Other
parameters followed previous reports.10,11
Study 2: Optimization of labeling
duration (LD) (N=5). ASL was performed with a fixed PLD=25ms and 11 LDs (50,100,200,300,500,700,900,1100,1300,1600,2000
ms) to examine the dependence of ΔMvein on LDs.
Study 3: Assessment of BBB
permeability in wild-type (WT) mice (N=5). ASL (optimized
parameters from Studies 1&2 used) and PC MRI were repeated by three times
to test the reproducibility of measurements.
Study 4: BBB permeability in a mouse model of HD (N=26). 17 mice (20-24 weeks; 9 zQ175 HD and 8 WT) were included in MRI sessions
to test the sensitivity of our method in detecting BBB dysfunction induced by
disease pathology. Another 9 age-matched mice (4 zQ175 and 5 WT) were included
for Western blotting analyses focusing on two types of tight-junction proteins
(ZO-1 and Claudin-5), which were critical components of the BBB structure.
Linear mixed-effect
(LME) model and Student's t-test were used for statistical analyses
(significance level at P<0.05). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Study
1: Great vein of Galen (VG) was larger than
the superior sagittal sinus (used in human WEPCAST5) and therefore was vein of interest in mice (Fig. 1A). Figures 1B-1D
present the control, labeled, and difference ASL images with PLDs. By fitting
VG signals at different PLDs (Fig. 1E) into Eq. (2), it was estimated that BATvein=691.2±14.5
ms.
Study 2: Figures 2A-2C show the control, labeled,
and difference ASL images as functions of LDs. A progressive buildup of ASL
signals can be noticed at the VG (Fig. 2C). Fitting of VG signals at different
LDs (Fig. 2D) led to the estimation that LD=1200 ms with PLD=100ms provides a
trade-off among sensitivity, scan duration, and specific absorption rate.
Study 3: Figure 3 summarizes the test-retest reproducibility results. The BBB
permeability index, PS, has a CoV of 6.1±1.2%, suggesting excellent reliability.
We also observed a significant increases in CBF (Fig. 3B; P=0.0004) and ΔM/M0
signal (Fig. 3C; P=0.012), a significant decrease in E (Fig. 3D; P=0.009), but
no significant change in PS (Fig. 3E; P=0.38), which we attributed to
accumulation effect of anesthesia. There was a significant negative correlation
between CBF and E (Fig. 3F, y=-0.17x+116.82, R2=0.61,
P=0.0006), suggesting that the variations in CBF and E have a physiological
origin.
Study 4: HD mice showed a higher E (69.7±2.4%, Fig. 4A,
P=0.026) and PS (318.1±17.1 ml/100g/min, Fig. 4B, P=0.040) when compared to WT
mice (E=59.9±3.2%, PS=260.9±18.9 ml/100g/min), suggesting a higher BBB
permeability. There were no significant differences in
brain volume (Fig. 4C, P=0.72), baseline CBF (Fig. 4D, P=0.26), and BATvein
(Fig. 4E, P=0.43). There were significant differences in ZO-1 (Fig. 5B,
P=0.037) and Claudin 5 (Fig. 5C, P<0.001). The reduced ZO-1 and
Claudin-5 in HD mice showed agreement with the increased E and PS, supporting
the BBB-related measurements with non-invasive imaging. CONCLUSION
We
developed a quantitative MRI method for measuring BBB permeability in mice. Initial
application in the mouse model of Huntington's disease supports the sensitivity of this technique in detecting
subtle BBB breakdown.Acknowledgements
Z Wei and H Liu contributed equally to this work. References
1. Banks WA, Reed MJ, Logsdon AF et al. Healthy aging and the blood-brain barrier. Nat Aging 2021; 1(3): 243-254.
2. Lin Z, Sur S, Liu P et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in
relationship to Alzheimer and vascular disease. Ann Neurol 2021; 90(2): 227-238.
3. Drouin-Ouellet J, Sawiak SJ, Cisbani
G et al. Cerebrovascular and
blood-brain barrier impairments in Huntington's disease: Potential implications
for its pathophysiology. Ann Neurol 2015;
78(2): 160-77.
4. Montagne A, Toga AW, Zlokovic BV.
Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability and Gadolinium: Benefits and Potential
Pitfalls in Research. JAMA Neurol 2016;
73(1): 13-4.
5. Lin Z, Li Y, Su P et al. Non‐contrast MR imaging of
blood‐brain
barrier permeability to water. Magn Reson
Med 2018; 80(4): 1507-1520.
6. Dickie BR, Parker GJM, Parkes LM.
Measuring water exchange across the blood-brain barrier using MRI. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2020; 116: 19-39.
7. Lin Z, Lance E, McIntyre T et al. Imaging Blood-Brain Barrier
Permeability Through MRI in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A Feasibility Study.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 55(5): 1551-1558.
8. Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42
from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol 1959; 197: 1205-10.
9. Crone C. The permeability of
capillaries in various organs as determined by use of the 'indicator diffusion'
method. Acta Physiol Scand 1963; 58: 292-305.
10. Wei Z, Li Y, Hou X et al. Quantitative cerebrovascular reactivity MRI in mice using
acetazolamide challenge. Magn Reson Med 2022;
88: 2233–2241.
11. Wei Z, Xu J, Chen L et al. Brain metabolism in tau and
amyloid mouse models of Alzheimer's disease: An MRI study. NMR Biomed 2021; 34(9): e4568.