Siyuan Hu1, Yong Chen1, Mark Griswold1, and Dan Ma1
1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Motion Correction, MR Fingerprinting
MR Fingerprinting (MRF)
simultaneously measures multiple tissue properties within a single scan.
Although 2D MRF has been shown to be less sensitivie to motion than conventional
imaging, bulk motion is still problematic for longer 3D MR Fingerprinting
scans. We propose to integrate 3D fat navigators with 3D MRF acquisitions for
motion correction in neuroimaging, especially for non-sedated pediatric imaging.
The proposed method was validated in in vivo scans of healthy subjects with
various types of motions and in non-sedated infants. We showed that the
fat-navigated 3D MRF framework could resolve and correct bulk motions of both
healthy volunteers and infants.
Introduction
MR Fingerprinting (MRF) simultaneously
measures multiple tissue properties within a single scan1. MRF scans are known to yield
better robustness against subject motion as compared to conventional MRI, since
the inherently motion-insensitive spiral trajectories are often utilized, and
the dictionary matching process could further reduce motion artifacts1,2. However, 3D MRF scans are
susceptible to bulk motions due to the long scan time. 3D fat-navigator-based
motion correction has been developed in previous studies for structural brain
imaging3,4. Here, we propose to
implement a 3D fat-navigator-based motion correction algorithm with high-image-resolution
3D MRF scans to improve motion robustness. We show that the proposed approach
could monitor and correct the motions of healthy volunteers and non-sedated infants
with neonatal opioid withdrawal symptoms.Methods
Acquisition
To improve the motion robustness of
3D MRF scans, a 3D fat navigator module was inserted during the wait time at
the end of each partition acquisition as described in (5). The FLASH-based fat
navigators were acquired with spiral GRAPPA along both in-plane and through-plane directions with
acceleration factors of R6x25. The
imaging parameters for the 3D fat navigator: FOV, 250x250x144mm3;
image resolution 2x2x3mm3; flip angle, 6 degrees; scan time, ~0.5 sec.
3D MRF data were acquired using FISP-MRF
sequences adapted from (6). All scans were acquired on a 3T Siemens Vida scanner. The acquisition parameters for 3D MRF: 1mm3
isotropic resolution, scan time ~5.6 min for whole-brain coverage.
Reconstruction
Each fat navigator image volume was
reconstructed with a 3x2 GRAPPA kernel in both in-plane and through-plane
directions. Motion waveforms were then extracted from the reconstructed fat
image series using the SPM12 toolbox. Motions were
corrected in k-space of the 3D MRF data, which was subsequently processed by iterative reconstruction with
SVD-based dictionary compression7,8.
Validation
We first performed simulations to evaluate
the effect of various motions on the MRF maps before and after motion
correction. Sinusoidal motion waveforms of in-plane/through-plane rotation and
translation were simulated respectively (Figure 1a). The simulated rotational
motions were within ±10 degrees, and the translation motions were within ±5mm
to match the extent of motions observed in in vivo scans (Figure 2a). The
motions were applied to a 3D digital brain phantom in the image domain; the
data was undersampled according to the actual 3D MRF scheme and the motion was
corrected in k-space.
The proposed fat-navigated 3D MRF
scan was tested on 5 healthy subjects. All subjects were scanned with a
reference MRF scan with no motion and 3 MRF scans with 3 types of motions. The
subjects were instructed to continuously perform shaking, nodding, and rolling
throughout the acquisitions in 3 separate scans. The motion-corrected and non-corrected MRF maps were compared against the
reference MRF dataset. Specifically, the MRF
maps from the motion scans and the reference scan were co-registered after
skull stripping, followed by pixel-wise comparisons of T1 and T2 values of the
center slice. The Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate
the similarity between each pair.
The proposed approach was also implemented for the OBOE (Outcomes of Babies with Opioid Exposure) study.
A non-sedated 1-month-old infant exhibiting neonatal opioid withdrawal symptoms
was scanned with the fat-navigated 3D MRF protocol.Results
Figure 1 shows the simulated T1 and T2
maps before and after motion correction using the
four types of simulated motions. Rotations mainly cause blurring of sharp edges, and translations lead to blurring and ghosting artifacts without motion
corrections, resulting in root-mean-square errors of up to 35.5% for T1 and 42.8%
for T2. These errors are significantly reduced to 5.9%, 7.7%, 5.8%, and 5.6%
for T1; 9.4%, 11.8%, 9.2%, and 8.7% for T2 after correction.
Figure 2 shows in vivo MRF maps
acquired on a representative volunteer. The motions caused severe blurring and
ghosting artifacts similar to those observed in simulations before motion
correction. Motion-corrected MRF maps were robust against such artifacts.
Figure 3 shows the results of
pixel-wise quantitative comparisons between the MRF maps from the motion scans
and the reference scans. The ICC of non-corrected MRF maps versus the reference
were all below 0.5 for both T1 and T2, indicating poor reliability. Motion
corrections significantly raised ICC to 0.77, 0.65, and 0.72 for T1, showing excellent
correlations with the reference; the ICC of T2 of 0.65, 0.54, and 0.57 were
slightly lower, yet yield good correlations. Results of the pixel-wise analysis for all five volunteers (Figure 4) demonstrate consistent improvements in ICC for both T1 and T2 after
motion correction in all cases.
Figure 5 shows the motion-corrected
results of an infant with opioid exposure. While the subject was scanned during
natural sleep, bulk shifting motion was detected during the acquisition. The corrected
MRF scans could reveal brain structures with
unique contrast between white matter and grey matter.Conclusions
We propose a motion-corrected MRF
framework using fat navigators to effectively reduce motion-related artifacts
for neuroimaging. The proposed approach could be combined with an accelerated
high-resolution 3D MRF framework, and significantly improves its robustness against various types of head motions. We also demonstrate a
promising application of the method for a non-sedated baby with neonatal
opioid withdrawal symptoms from our OBOE study. Future studies will be
continued for extensive pediatric populations.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Siemens Healthineers and NIH grants EB026764-01 and NS109439-01.References
1. Ma D, Gulani V,
Seiberlich N, et al. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495(7440):187-192.
2. Gao
Y, Chen Y, Ma D, et al. Preclinical MR fingerprinting (MRF) at 7 T: effective
quantitative imaging for rodent disease models. NMR Biomed.
2015;28(3):384-394. doi:10.1002/nbm.3262
3. Gallichan
D, Marques JP, Gruetter R. Retrospective correction of involuntary microscopic
head movement using highly accelerated fat image navigators (3D FatNavs) at 7T.
Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(3):1030-1039. doi:10.1002/mrm.25670
4. Gallichan
D, Marques JP. Optimizing the acceleration and resolution of three-dimensional
fat image navigators for high-resolution motion correction at 7T. Magn Reson
Med. 2017;77(2):547-558. doi:10.1002/mrm.26127
5. Chen
Y, Zong X, Ma D, Lin W, Griswold M. Improving motion robustness of 3D MR
Fingerprinting using fat navigator. 29th Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med.
Published online 2020.
6. Jordan
SP, Hu S, Rozada I, et al. Automated design of pulse sequences for magnetic
resonance fingerprinting using physics-inspired optimization. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2021;118(40). doi:10.1073/PNAS.2020516118/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL
7. McGivney
DF, Pierre E, Ma D, et al. SVD compression for magnetic resonance
fingerprinting in the time domain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging.
2014;33(12):2311-2322. doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2337321
8. Hamilton
JI, Jiang Y, Ma D, et al. Simultaneous multislice cardiac magnetic resonance
fingerprinting using low rank reconstruction. NMR Biomed.
2019;32(2):e4041. doi:10.1002/NBM.4041