Ryan K Robison1,2,3, Justin R Haynes2,3, Sandeep Ganji4,5, Wellington Pham2,3, Seth A Smith2,3, Victoria L Morgan2,3, Reid C Thompson6, Reed A Omary3, John C Gore2,3, and Changho Choi2,3
1Philips, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Philips, Rochester, MN, United States, 5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 6Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Data Acquisition, Spectroscopy
Lactate is important as a source of energy and a product of
metabolism, so the capability to measure lactate accurately and noninvasively
by MRS is of high value. We report a new lactate editing approach that enables
detection of the lactate 1.3 ppm resonance with minimal contaminations from threonine
and other compounds. Narrow-band editing 180° RF pulses were implemented in 1H MR MEGA-PRESS and the sequence was optimized
with numerical and phantom analyses. With data from six healthy adult subjects,
the lactate and threonine concentrations in healthy brain were estimated to be
0.5±0.1 and 1.0±0.1 mM, respectively.
Introduction
Several studies have suggested that brain lactate plays important
roles in several functions including energy supply, metabolism, and signaling
for neuronal activities1. The capability to measure lactate
noninvasively without contamination from other compounds is therefore of high
significance. J-difference editing (MEGA) is often used to overcome the
spectral overlaps of the lactate 1.3 ppm resonance with neighboring large
signals. Threonine also has a CH3 proton resonance at 1.3 ppm, J coupled
to the CH proton resonance at 4.25 ppm, only 0.15 ppm distant from the Lac CH
proton resonance (Figure 1A). Thus, threonine can be coedited but
contaminates lactate editing to a degree that depends on the effect of the
editing 180ᵒ RF pulse on the threonine 4.25 ppm resonance. Here we report a new
MEGA approach that enables discrimination of the lactate and threonine 1.3 ppm
resonances.Methods
Two 45.3 ms long rectangular editing 180° RF pulses
(E180) were implemented within TE 139 ms MEGA-PRESS on a Philips 3T scanner (Figure 1B). The E180 (bandwidth 17.6 Hz) had
negligible effect on resonances 0.15 ppm (19 Hz) away from the carrier
frequency at 3T. Following validation of the editing efficacy of the E180
pulses with numerical and phantom analyses, the MEGA was tested in 6 healthy adult subjects (30x27x27 mm3 voxel in parietal brain). Three sets of
spectra were obtained with the E180 tuned at 4.1, 4.25, and 999 ppm (subspectra
A, B, and C, respectively) (Figure 1C). LCModel was used for spectral fitting. The lactate and threonine
concentrations were estimated from difference spectra, (A–C)/2 and (B–C)/2,
respectively, with reference to water.Results
Numerical simulations indicated that, when the 45.3 ms E180 pulses are
tuned to 4.1 ppm (subscan A), a positive signal from lactate is induced at 1.3
ppm (Figure 1C). A difference spectrum, (A‒C)/2, showed an edited lactate signal with
amplitude 54% of the unedited signal for a singlet FWHM of
6 Hz, ignoring T2 relaxation effects. The E180 had negligible
effects on 4.25 ppm in the subscan, and consequently the threonine spins gave an
inverted peak at 1.3 ppm. A small coedited threonine signal was present at 1.3
ppm in the difference spectrum. When the E180 was tuned to 4.25 ppm (subscan
B), the polarities of lactate and threonine signals were negative and positive,
thereby leading to small lactate and fully-edited threonine signals in the
(B‒C)/2 spectrum.
The
calculated lactate and threonine signals agreed well with short-TE STEAM spectra
from phantoms (Figure 2A,B). The strengths and polarities of the lactate and threonine MEGA signals
from the phantoms were as predicted in simulations (Figure 2C,D). For a lactate and NAA phantom, when the signals were broadened to NAA
FWHM of 6 Hz, the lactate signal amplitudes were 28% and 7% with respect to the
NAA singlet amplitude in (A‒C)/2 and (B‒C)/2 spectra, respectively. For a threonine and NAA phantom, the
threonine peak amplitude was 6% and 30% the NAA singlet amplitude in (A‒C)/2
and (B‒C)/2 spectra, respectively.
Figure 3 presents in vivo MEGA editing results in a
healthy subject. A doublet signal was clearly discernible at 1.3 ppm in the (A‒C)/2
spectrum. Spectral fitting of the signal with a lactate basis resulted in 0.6
mM lactate. The (B‒C)/2 spectrum showed somewhat broad signals between 1.1 and
1.5 ppm. Threonine was estimated as 1.0 mM.
The
MEGA was tested in 6 healthy volunteers. In each of the (A‒C)/2 difference spectra,
a signal was clearly discernible at 1.3 ppm (Figure 4). From spectral fitting of the signals with a lactate basis, the lactate
concentration was estimated to be 0.5±0.1 mM (N=6). All (B‒C)/2 spectra showed broad signals at
~1.3 ppm. Threonine level was estimated as 1.0±0.1 mM, ~2 fold higher than the
lactate estimation.Discussion
Our data indicate that selective inversion of the lactate 4.1 ppm and
threonine 4.25 ppm resonances can be achieved with 45.3 ms rectangular editing
pulses within the commonly used lactate editing echo-time frame (e.g., 144ms),
thereby enabling discrimination of lactate and threonine signals. The
capability to generate a high-purity lactate signal would outweigh potential reduction
of the editing yield arising from use of narrow-band editing pulses, making it
possible to detect modest changes in lactate level reliably.
The lactate
estimation in the current study is in good agreement with the result in an
early study of lactate measurement by a non-MEGA difference editing at 3T
(narrow-band-pulse triple-refocusing)2. Many prior studies used MEGA for measuring brain lactate and
reported lactate levels with reference to creatine (tCr). The lactate/tCr ratio
in our data was 0.07±0.01, 2 - 3 fold smaller compared to the prior studies, in
which the bandwidths of the editing 180ᵒ pulses were larger than 50 Hz and
consequently these previous MEGA measures of lactate may contain considerable
contamination of threonine3,4.Conclusion
We have demonstrated separation of the lactate
and threonine 1.3 ppm resonances by MEGA-PRESS at 3T in vivo. Brain lactate and
threonine levels were estimated to be approximately 0.5 and 1.0 mM, respectively.
The proposed MEGA editing scheme may provide a noninvasive tool for identifying
modest alterations in brain lactate level reliably.Acknowledgements
This research was supported by institutional funds provided by VICC,
VUIIS, and the Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences and
Neurological Surgery.References
1. Magistretti PJ, Allaman I. Lactate in the
brain: from metabolic end-product to signalling molecule. Nat Rev Neurosci. 19;235:2018.
2. Choi C, Coupland NJ, Kalra S, et al.
Proton Spectral Editing for Discrimination of Lactate and Threonine 1.31 ppm
Resonances in Human Brain In Vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:660.
3. Chan KL, Snoussi K, Edden RAE, et al.
Simultaneous detection of glutathione and lactate using spectral editing at 3
T. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3800.
4. Dacko M, Lange T. Improved detection of
lactate and β‐hydroxybutyrate using MEGA‐sLASER at 3 T. NMR Biomed.
2019;32:e4100.