Guodong Weng1,2, Piotr Radojewski1,2, Federico Turco1,2, and Johannes Slotboom1,2
1Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Translational Imaging Center, sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland
Synopsis
Keywords: Pulse Sequence Design, Spectroscopy, Downfield MRSI
Many interesting metabolites, for instance adenosine triphosphate (ATP), glutathione (GSH) and homocarnosine (hCs), have resonances in the downfield range (>4.7 ppm) in 1H-MRS. Previous studies have studied the downfield spectra of metabolites in human brain using single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) and, most recently, 2D one-slice MRSI. The study presents a 3D whole brain mapping sequence suited for downfield metabolites which does not require water suppression pulses.
INTRODUCTION
There are substantially
less studies on downfield (DF) in vivo MR-spectroscopy of the brain than
upfield studies. There are several reasons for this; for example low
sensitivity due to low concentrations, overlapping resonances and, in many cases, fast proton exchange. Although not all down field resonances are assigned yet,
most of the metabolites could be assigned, for instance important metabolites like adenosine
triphosphate (ATP), glutathione (GSH), phosphor creatine (PCr), glutamine (Gln)
homocarnosine (hCs) [1], [2] and also alpha-glucose. Often, large
volumes were studied using single voxel spectroscopy at low and midfield [3]. At (X)UHF, voxel sizes comparable to those
of upfield MRS performed at low to midfield can be applied [1], [2]. Utilizing the fast exchange of many
downfield protons, highly spatial resolved maps can be obtained indirectly by
CEST-imaging [4]. Very recently, the very first 2D-MRSI
method was proposed to map the downfield metabolites at 3T [5]. Here we report on an UHF EPSI-based [6] method for 3D whole brain metabolite mapping
of the downfield spectrum in the human brain.METHODS
The MRSI was performed
on a Siemens 7T scanner (MAGNETOM Terra, Germany) using the Nova 1Tx32Rx head
coil (USA). One healthy subject (male, 35 years
old) was measured.
The 2π-CSAP-EPSI sequence [6], [7] (see Figure 1) with asymmetric 2π-CSAP [8] was applied with the following parameters:
TE = 60 ms,
TR = 1300 ms, nominal matrix = 65 × 23 × 7 (4.3 × 7.8 × 10 mm), zero filling
matrix = 65 × 42 × 8 (4.3 × 4.3 × 8.8 mm), FOV = 280 × 180 × 70 mm, averages =
14, and TA = 42 min. The
refocusing/editing chemical-selective adiabatic pulse (2π-CSAP) is 20 ms duration.
The bandwidth (full width at 50% maximum) ranges from 6.7 – 9.7 ppm (Figure 1B). An
adiabatic inversion recovery pulse was used to suppressed lipid at around 5.5
ppm. However, no water suppression needs to be applied due to the implicit
water suppression of the 2π-CSAP.
The DF
(DownField) 7.02 (6.9-7.15 ppm; hCs/GSH), DF 7.82 (7.6-8.05 ppm; NAA), and DF
8.16 (8.05-8.35 ppm; ATP/GSH) maps were generated by absorption peak integration.
The metabolites signal was voxel wise divided by the water reference signal to
correct B1+-inhomogeneities of the
non-adiabatic excitation pulse and B1--inhomogeneities due to
received coils. RESULTS and DISCUSSION
Figure 2 shows
the spectra of the sum of 9 voxels (12.9 × 12.9 × 8.8 mm, 1.46 ml) at different locations. The peak
DF 7.02 is likely attributable to homocarnosine (hCs) and glutathione (GSH),
the peak DF 7.82 is mainly attributable to NAA, and the peak DF 8.16 is most
likely representing GSH and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [1], [2], [5].
The water reference maps
were generated by absorption peak integration and are shown in Figure 3.
The peak integration
maps of DF 7.02, DF 7.82, and DF 8.16 are shown in Figure
4, and
integration intervals are listed in the legend. The DF 7.82 level, which is
mainly due to NAA, shows a trend towards a general WM/GM difference, higher in
grey matter, and lower in white matter. This is consistent with the upfield NAA
maps reported in the literature [9]. The result indicates that the DF 7.02 and
the DF 8.16 levels are also not uniformly distributed over the entire brain.
The left-right asymmetric hot spot for DF 8.16 on slice #5 may be caused by
baseline fluctuation related to EPSI-readout and is less likely to be of
physiologic nature.
Figure 5
illustrates two spectra stemming from larger volumes (52 voxels, 8.46 ml)
located in the grey matter (GM), and the white matter (WM). The
signal difference between GM and WM at DF 8.16 is very clearly observable. CONCLUSION
To our best knowledge, this is the
first work to show the feasibility of 1H-MRSI based whole brain
downfield metabolites mapping in humans. Due to the superior
frequency-selective properties of the 2π-CSAP a close-to-perfect water and lipid suppression can be
obtained, enabling simple peak integration for mapping, which is on its own an
astonishing feature for UHF 2π-CSAP-based
MRSI.
The results of downfield NAA-maps are consistent with upfield NAA-maps. The
quality of the metabolic maps could be further improved by applying model
fitting which includes a baseline as well. Measurement time could be reduced by accelerated
readout schemes as well as noise removal algorithms to shorten the measurement
time such that it becomes clinically applicable.Acknowledgements
The
research is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF-182569).References
[1] N. D. Fichtner et al., “In vivo
characterization of the downfield part of 1H MR spectra of human brain at 9.4
T: Magnetization exchange with water and relation to conventionally determined
metabolite content,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 2863–2873, Jun.
2018, doi: 10.1002/MRM.26968.
[2] T. Borbath, S. Murali-Manohar, A. M.
Wright, and A. Henning, “In vivo characterization of downfield peaks at 9.4 T:
T2 relaxation times, quantification, pH estimation, and assignments,” Magn
Reson Med, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 587–600, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1002/MRM.28442.
[3] M. Dziadosz, M. Hoefemann, A. Döring,
M. Marjańska, E. J. Auerbach, and R. Kreis, “Quantification of NAD+ in human
brain with 1H MR spectroscopy at 3 T: Comparison of three localization
techniques with different handling of water magnetization,” Magn Reson Med,
vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1027–1038, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1002/MRM.29267.
[4] K. M. Ward, A. H. Aletras, and R. S.
Balaban, “A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical
exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST),” J Magn Reson, vol. 143,
no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2000, doi: 10.1006/JMRE.1999.1956.
[5] M. Považan, M. Schär, J. Gillen, and P.
B. Barker, “Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of downfield proton
resonances in the human brain at 3 T,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 87, no. 4,
pp. 1661–1672, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/MRM.29142.
[6] A. Ebel and A. A. Maudsley, “Improved
spectral quality for 3D MR spectroscopic imaging using a high spatial
resolution acquisition strategy,” Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 21, no. 2,
pp. 113–120, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00645-8.
[7] G. Weng et al., “SLOW: A novel
spectral editing method for whole‐brain MRSI at ultra high magnetic field,” Magn
Reson Med, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 53–70, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/mrm.29220.
[8] J. Slotboom et al., “Proton
Resonance Spectroscopy Study of the Effects of L-Ornithine-L-Aspartate on the
Development of Encephalopathy, Using Localization Pulses with Reduced Specific
Absorption Rate,” J Magn Reson B, vol. 105, no. 2, Oct. 1994, doi:
10.1006/jmrb.1994.1114.
[9] A. Klauser, P. Klauser, F. Grouiller,
S. Courvoisier, and F. Lazeyras, “Whole-brain high-resolution metabolite
mapping with 3D compressed-sensing SENSE low-rank 1H FID-MRSI,” NMR Biomed,
vol. 35, no. 1, p. e4615, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/NBM.4615.
[10] J.
Slotboom, A. Nirkko, C. Brekenfeld, and D. van Ormondt, “Reliability testing of
in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) signals and signal artifact
reduction by order statistic filtering,” Meas Sci Technol, vol. 20, no.
10, p. 104030, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/10/104030.