Hazar Benan Unal1, Shahriar Zeynali1, Subha Raman2, Balaji Tamarappoo2, Rohan Dharmakumar2, and Behzad Sharif1,2
1Laboratory for Translational Imaging of Microcirculation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 2Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Myocardium, Ischemia, dobutamine
Myocardial T1 reactivity, defined as the
relative T1 change from rest to stress, has been proposed as a marker for
detection of ischemic heart disease. Commonly used MOLLI T1 mapping is
sensitive to B0 field inhomogeneities and can have susceptibility/banding
artifacts because of bSSFP readouts, especially at 3T. In this study, we
investigated the feasibility of free-breathing SR-FLASH T1 mapping for ferumoxytol-enhanced
(FE) dobutamine-stress T1 reactivity studies at 3T in preclinical settings. We
showed the feasibility of using a widely available perfusion sequence for T1
reactivity studies under Ferumoxytol-enhancement.
Background
Myocardial T1 reactivity, defined as the myocardial
T1 change in response to exercise or pharmacological stress relative to the
baseline/resting T1 value, has been proposed as a novel marker for detection of
ischemic heart disease.1,2 In such studies, MOLLI-based T1 mapping is commonly used
due to its high precision and wide availability across different scanner
platforms.3-5 MOLLI uses balanced steady-state (bSSFP) readouts and
hence is sensitive to B0 field inhomogeneities which can result in susceptibility/banding
artifacts, especially at 3T. Furthermore, in T1 reactivity patient studies
which require either exercise or pharmacological
stress, it may not be feasible to perform
breath-hold scans. In such settings, free-breathing MOLLI scans will need to be
performed which, due to the varying tissue/blood contrasts (across different
inversion times), may lead to inaccurate T1 values as a result of imperfect
registration.
In this work, we propose a “single-point
T1 mapping” approach using a saturation-recovery (SR) prepared FLASH (SR-FLASH)
with a fixed SR time, which is the same pulse sequence as the one commonly used
for first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI studies.6 Although SR-FLASH-based imaging has lower signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) than bSSFP-based T1 mapping techniques, this can be compensate for by
(1) continuous acquisition of multiple frames to “average out” the noise in the
image series, (2) SNR enhancement by administering a T1-reducing intravascular contrast agent
such as ferumoxytol. In addition, the consistent contrast in SR-FLASH image
series enables inline nonrigid motion correction to perform consistently in
free-breathing settings. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of
free-breathing SR-FLASH T1 mapping for ferumoxytol-enhanced (FE) dobutamine-stress
T1 reactivity studies at 3T in a preclinical setting.Methods
We conducted stress/rest FE studies on a
clinical whole-body scanner (Siemens) at 3T in 6 healthy pigs under a wide
range of dobutamine-induced stress heart rates (to mimic exercise stress). Data
was acquired using both the established MOLLI-based T1 mapping approach and our
proposed SR-FLASH-based T1 reactivity mapping. For
SR-FLASH scans, we used a widely available perfusion sequence with following
parameters: TE/TR = 1.08/1.97 ms, flip angle = 14o, SR time = 150 ms,
matrix = 130x160 with GRAPPA factor = 2. We acquired 1 proton-density (PD)
weighted and 28 T1-weighted images and used the “single-point T1 mapping”
approach often used in quantitative perfusion techniques. 6 To
validate our T1 quantification scheme, we conducted phantom studies with ferumoxytol-doped
agar to compare vs MOLLI. In the pig studies,
we manually segmented the myocardium (2 readers in
consensus) avoiding partial volume effects, and performed the analysis on a
“bull’s eye map” by dividing the myocardium into 12 angular and 3 radial subsectors.
We evaluated the agreement between SR-FLASH and MOLLI in the anteroseptal sector
as in-vivo validation for SR-FLASH. We then analyzed the agreement between
neighboring subsectors in anterior wall (the region that is less prone to bSSFP-related
artifacts) and the inferior wall (the region more sensitive to bSSFP-related
artifacts) for both MOLLI and SR-FLASH maps.Results
Our phantom studies showed excellent correlation
between SR-FLASH and MOLLI T1 maps with R = 0.99 and p < 10-4
(Figure 1). MOLLI T1 values were 10% lower than SR-FLASH T1 values on average as
expected because of MOLLI’s known T1 underestimation. Although free-breathing MOLLI
at rest performed well, it occasionally failed at stress. SR-FLASH, on the other
hand, was much more robust to very high heart rates (Figure 2). Moreover, even
breathhold MOLLI scans were sensitive to susceptibility/banding artifacts in
lateral wall (Figure 3). Fig
4 shows example MOLLI T1 maps for native rest and FE rest/stress scans in a
representative animal. As highlighted with arrows, FE stress T1 values are
lower than FE rest indicating increased myocardial blood volume during
dobutamine stress. SR-FLASH and MOLLI T1 reactivities showed good
correlation in the anteroseptal sector (R = 0.76, p<0.001). For comparison,
the agreement between T1 reactivities obtained by 2 different sets of MOLLI
scans were R = 0.85, which shows the natural variability in T1 reactivity
studies. SR-FLASH and MOLLI T1 reactivities both performed well in terms of the
agreement between neighboring subsectors in anterior wall (R = 0.75 and R = 0.83,
respectively). However, SR-FLASH outperformed better MOLLI in terms of
agreement between neighboring subsectors in the inferior wall (R = 0.76 vs R =
0.40). A representative case is shown in Fig 5, where MOLLI has a severe susceptibility/banding
artifact in inferior/lateral wall whereas SR-FLASH is artifact-free in the same
region. Discussion/Conclusion
In this study, we showed the feasibility of
using a widely available SR-prepared FLASH pulse sequence (typically used for
myocardial perfusion imaging) to enable free-breathing FE T1 reactivity studies
at high stress/rest heart rates. Our results demonstrated that the proposed
SR-FLASH T1 reactivity mapping technique is robust to susceptibility/banding
artifacts which can affect MOLLI especially in the as lateral and inferior
sectors. Finally, since the image series acquired with SR-FLASH has a
consistent tissue/bloodpool contrast, it is well suited for inline motion-correction
which in turn enables rapid free-breathing T1 reactivity mapping in ferumoxytol-enhanced with exercise or
pharmacological stress.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Mahmod M, Piechnik SK,
Levelt E, Ferreira VM, Francis JM, Lewis A, et al. Adenosine stress native T1
mapping in severe aortic stenosis: evidence for a role of the intravascular
compartment on myocardial T1 values. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:92.
2. Colbert CM, Le AH, Shao J, Currier JW, Ajijola
OA, Hu P, Nguyen KL. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance T1 reactivity for
depiction of myocardial hypoperfusion. NMR
Biomed 2021;34:e4518.
3. Chow K, Flewitt JA, Green JD, Pagano
JJ, Friedrich MG, Thompson RB. Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition
(SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping. Magn
Reson Med. 2014;71:2082-2095. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24878
4. Messroghli
DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins DM, Sivananthan MU, Ridgway JP. Modified
Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the
heart. Magn Reson Med.
2004;52:141-146. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20110
5. Xanthis
CG, Bidhult S, Greiser A, Chow K, Thompson RB, Arheden H, Aletras AH.
Simulation-based quantification of native T1 and T2 of the myocardium using a
modified MOLLI scheme and the importance of Magnetization Transfer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:96-106. doi:
10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.020
6. Cernicanu
A, Axel L. Theory-based signal calibration with single-point T1 measurements
for first-pass quantitative perfusion MRI studies. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.02.040