0282

An improved sub-voxel QSM for susceptibility source separation
Zhenghao Li1, Ruimin Feng1, and Hongjiang Wei1
1Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Synopsis

Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Quantitative Susceptibility mapping

Conventional quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction methods only provide voxel-averaged susceptibility value. We proposed a comprehensive complex signal model that describes the relationship between the 3D GRE signal and the contributions of opposing susceptibility to the frequency shift and $$$R_2^*$$$ relaxation. We used an iterative data fitting scheme to alternatively determine the sub-voxel susceptibilities and the voxel-wise proportionality coefficient between $$$R_2'$$$ and absolute susceptibility. Our experiments on in-vivo human brain data compared with histological staining images demonstrate that the proposed method provides more accurate results for quantifying brain iron and myelin than previous QSM separation methods.

Introduction

Advanced susceptibility imaging methods have been recently developed to distinguish the contributions of opposing susceptibility sources for QSM1,2. The magnitude decay kernel, representing the proportionality constant between $$$R_2'$$$ and the absolute susceptibility, was considered spatial-invariant under the static dephasing regime3. However, this assumption is too ideal for modeling the real relationship between $$$R_2'$$$ and susceptibility in brain tissue. Here, we proposed a more comprehensive complex signal model that describes the relationship between the 3D GRE signal and the contributions of opposing susceptibility to the frequency shift and $$$R_2^*$$$ relaxation. We used an iterative data fitting scheme to alternatively determine the sub-voxel susceptibilities and the voxel-specific magnitude decay kernel between $$$R_2'$$$ and absolute susceptibility.

Methods

Improved QSM separation algorithm
In the magnetic field, the biological materials with susceptibility $$$\chi$$$ will induce inhomogeneities, resulting in frequency shift $$$\Delta f$$$ and $$$R_2' (=R_2^*-R_2)$$$ relaxation. Both $$$\Delta f$$$ and $$$R_2'$$$ can be formulated by paramagnetic susceptibility $$$\chi_{para}$$$ and diamagnetic susceptibility $$$\chi_{dia}$$$:
$$\left\{{\matrix{{\Delta f=D*\left({{\chi _{para}}+{\chi _{dia}}}\right)}\cr{{R_2'}=a\left({|{\chi_{para}}|+|{\chi_{dia}}|}\right)}\cr}}\right.\tag{1}$$
where $$$D$$$ is the dipole kernel and $$$*$$$ denotes the spatial convolution. $$$a$$$ is the magnitude decay kernel, representing the proportionality constant between $$$R_2'$$$ and the absolute susceptibility.
These inhomogeneities can be modeled using multi-echo GRE signal $$$S$$$:
$$S\left({T{E_j}}\right)={M_0}{e^{-\left({{R_2}+a|{\chi _{para}}\ \ |+a|{\chi_{dia}}\ |}\right)T{E_j}}}\cdot{e^{i\left\{ {{\phi_{res}}\ +2\pi f_{bg}\ TE_j+2\pi\gamma{B_0}\left[{D*\left({{\chi_{para}}\ \ +{\chi_{dia}}}\ \right)}\right]T{E_j}}\right\}}}\tag{2}$$
where $$$M_0$$$ is the extrapolated magnitude signal at echo time $$$(TE)$$$=0ms. $$$R_2$$$ relaxation can be obtained by an additional T2 mapping scan. $$$\phi_{res}$$$ is the time-independent initial phase. $$$\gamma$$$ is the gyromagnetic ratio and $$$2\pi {f_{bg}}{TE_j}$$$ denotes the background phase at $$$j^{\ th}$$$ echo times. The proposed method is eventually formulated as a two-step optimization. $$$M_0$$$ and $$$R_2^*$$$ can be firstly estimated using $$$N$$$ echo-time magnitude signals:
$$\mathop{\arg\min}\limits_{{M_0},\ R_2^*}\sum\limits_{j=1}^N{\left\|{\ln{M_j}-\left({\ln{M_0}-R_2^*T{E_j}}\right)}\right\|}_2^2\tag{3}$$
where $$${\left\|\cdot\right\|_2}$$$ denotes the $$$L2$$$ norm, and $$$M_j$$$ is the $$$j^{\ th}$$$ magnitude signal. The estimated $$$R_2^*$$$ was used in the next step to solve $$$\chi_{para}$$$ and $$$\chi_{dia}$$$:
$$\mathop{\arg\min}\limits_{{\chi_{para}}\ \ ,\ {\chi _{dia}}\ ,\ {\phi _{res}}}\left({\matrix{{{\lambda _1}\left\| {R_2^*-{R_2}-a\left({{\chi _{para}}-{\chi _{dia}}}\right)}\right\|_2^2}\cr{+\sum\limits_{j=1}^N{i\left\|{{\phi _{uw,\ T{E_j}}}-{\phi_{res}}-2\pi\left\{{{f_{bg}}+\gamma{B_0}\left[{D*\left({{\chi _{para}}+{\chi _{dia}}}\right)}\right]}\right\}T{E_j}}\right\|_2^2} }\cr{+{\lambda _2}\left\|{\chi-\left({{\chi_{para}}+{\chi _{dia}}}\right)}\right\|_2^2+{\lambda_3}\left({TV\left({{\chi_{para}}}\right)+TV\left({{\chi _{dia}}}\right)}\right)}\cr}}\right)\tag{4}$$
where $$$\phi _{uw,\ T{E_j}}$$$ is the unwrapped phase image, and $$$\chi$$$ is a pre-reconstructed QSM map. $$$TV(\cdot)$$$ is a 3D spatial total variation operator. $$$\lambda_1$$$, $$$\lambda_2$$$, and $$$\lambda_3$$$ are the regularization factors.
The proposed method regards the magnitude decay kernel as voxel-specific and resorts to an iterative algorithm to fit a voxel-wise $$$a$$$-map $$$(a')$$$:
$$a' = {{{R_2'}} \over {|{\chi _{para}}| + |{\chi _{dia}}|}}\tag{5}$$
The obtained parameter $$$a'$$$ is then plugged back into Eq. $$$(4)$$$ to recalculate $$$\chi_{para}$$$ and $$$\chi_{dia}$$$, then obtaining $$$a'$$$ following Eq. $$$(5)$$$ iteratively until convergence or the iterations reached 100.

Experiments
32 healthy human data were acquired at 3T. The 3D GRE scan parameters were: FOV=230×230×160mm3; matrix size=224×224×80; spatial resolution=1.03×1.03×2mm3; TR=40ms; TE1/spacing/TE7=2.4/4.3/28.2ms. The T2 mapping was acquired using 2D multi-echo spin echo (MSE) sequence with copied FOV from 3D GRE scan (TR=3864ms and TE1/spacing/TE5=16.1/16.1/80.5ms).
The $$$R_2$$$ map was fitted from MSE data using a mono-exponential function. The GRE phase data were unwrapped using a Laplacian-based phase unwrapping method4. The background phase and tissue phase were separated using V-SHARP method5. STAR-QSM6 was performed to pre-calculate QSM map. For comparison, a recent $$$\chi$$$-separation method1 was used.

Results

Fig. 1 shows the reconstructed maps of the healthy human data by the proposed method. $$$\chi_{para}$$$ map shows high positive values in deep gray matter (DGM) and blood vessels. $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ map reveals more negative susceptibility values in white matter. The magnitude decay kernels in the $$$a$$$-map decreased in the globus pallidus (GP) and some white matters. The $$$M_0$$$, $$$\phi_{res}$$$ and $$$R_2'$$$ maps are also shown in Fig. 1D, 1E and 1F.
Fig. 2 shows the comparison of the proposed method and $$$\chi$$$-separation’s results on the healthy subject with iron- and myelin-staining images from literature7 and website (https://brains.anatomy.msu.edu/). The $$$\chi_{para}$$$ map reconstructed from proposed method exhibits sparse positive susceptibility values in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC, orange arrows in the zoomed-in area), similar to the iron-staining image. However, the $$$\chi_{para}$$$ map from $$$\chi$$$-separation shows zero susceptibility values in PLIC. It is noted that the diamagnetic susceptibility values were clearly demonstrated in the GP by the proposed method’s $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ map, which is verified by the myelin staining (yellow arrows). In comparison, the $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ map reconstructed by $$$\chi$$$-separation shows barely diamagnetic susceptibility values in the GP.
Quantitatively, Fig. 3 presents mean values of conventional QSM, $$$\chi_{para}$$$, $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ and composite QSM in five DGM nuclei averaged over 32 subjects. Both methods produce higher susceptibility values in these DGMs than conventional QSM. The proposed method shows more negative susceptibility values. The composite QSM by $$$\chi_{para}$$$ and $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ from proposed method shows more comparable mean values to the conventional QSM than that from $$$\chi$$$-separation.

Discussion and Conclusion

This study proposed a new magnetic susceptibility separation method, which utilizes a comprehensive complex model with an iterative data fitting algorithm to accurately separate intravoxel paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility. Previous studies pre-determined a spatial-invariant magnitude decay kernel under the ideal static dephasing regime. Differently, our new method regards the magnitude decay kernel as voxel-specific, preventing the errors of the spatial-invariant kernel from propagating to the final QSM separation reconstruction. Thus, our method could be applied to quantifying the subtle magnetic susceptibility in brain tissue.

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61901256, 91949120, 62071299).

References

1. Shin HG, Lee J, Yun YH, et al. chi-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain. Neuroimage. 2021;240:118371.

2. Emmerich J, Bachert P, Ladd ME, et al. On the separation of susceptibility sources in quantitative susceptibility mapping: Theory and phantom validation with an in vivo application to multiple sclerosis lesions of different age. J Magn Reson. 2021;330:107033.

3. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32(6):749-763.

4. Schofield MA, Zhu Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Optics letters. 2003;28 14:1194-1196.

5. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, et al. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(1):137-147.

6. Wei H, Dibb R, Zhou Y, et al. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(10):1294-1303.

7. Drayer B, Burger P, Darwin R, et al. MRI of brain iron. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1986;147(1):103-110.

Figures

Figure 1. Results of a representative healthy human subject. The $$$\chi_{para}$$$ map (A) and $$$\chi_{dia}$$$ map (B) show the whole brain sub-voxel susceptibility separation results. (C) The voxel-specific $$$a$$$-map. (D) The extrapolated signal $$$M_0$$$ at TE=0ms. (E) $$$\phi_{res}$$$ denotes the time-independent initial phase. (F) The $$$R_2'$$$ map.

Figure 2. Comparisons of QSM, proposed method and $$$\chi$$$-separation on the representative healthy human brain data. The reconstructed maps from the proposed method show sparse positive values in the PLIC (orange arrows) and clear diamagnetic susceptibility values in the GP (yellow arrows), which are more consistent with the staining images than $$$\chi$$$-separation. PLIC: posterior limb of the internal capsule; GP: globus pallidus.

Figure 3. Region analysis in five selected DGMs of subjects (n=32) for QSM, paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility maps, and composite QSM from proposed method and $$$\chi$$$-separation. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. GP: globus pallidus; PUT: putamen; CN: caudate nucleus; SN: substantia nigra; RN: red nucleus; DGM: deep gray matter.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
0282
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/0282