Zilin Zhou1, Lingxiao Cao1, Yingxue Gao1, Ruohan Feng2, Yang Li3, Weijie Bao1, Kaili Liang1, Lihua Zhuo2, Guoping Huang3, and Xiaoqi Huang1,4
1Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, Chengdu, China, 2Department of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China, Mianyang, China, 3Department of Psychiatry, the Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China, Mianyang, China, 4Psychoradiology Research Unit of the Chinese Academy of Medical Science , West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, Chengdu, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Psychiatric Disorders, Adolescents, major depressive disorder
Using
a data-driven connectivity-based parcellation technique, we identified anterior
and posterior functional subdivisions of insula per hemisphere in adolescent population
based on their similar functional connectivity profiles.
Then, we investigated the distinct functional connectivity of each insular
subregion between depressive adolescents and typical developmental controls. The
significant unbalanced connectivity of insular subregions with left superior frontal gyrus (SFG) between two groups was revealed,
which associated with interpersonal relation, emotional expressiveness, and
cognition impairments in depressive adolescents. Our findings indicate that
abnormalities in functional architectures of insular subdivisions may be the
potential neuroimaging mechanism underlie the specific manifestations in adolescent
depression.
Introduction
The
insula, as a core region of paralimbic system, is widely connected to the
cortical, limbic and other paralimbic structures1, and the aberrant
functional connectivity of insula and its subregions has been revealed to associate
with the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD)2. Since the lack of insular functional subdivisions
derived from the adolescents, it was difficult for previous neuroimaging
studies to accurately uncover the abnormal functional connectivity of fined-grained
insular subregions in adolescents with MDD (aMDD). A recent data-driven
approach of connectivity-based parcellation (CBP)3, 4 makes it possible to segment
the insular cortex of adolescent brain based on functional connectivity
properties to provide a better representation of the insular functional
subdivisions in adolescents. Our current study used the insular subdivisions
derived from CBP approach to precisely delineate the fine-grained insular
subregional functional connectivity alterations in aMDD patients.Materials & Methods
We
recruited 65 first-episode drug-naive aMDD patients and 45 age- and gender-
matched typically developing controls (TDC) in this study. All participants underwent
the 3.0-Telsa Siemens magnetic resonance imaging system equipped with
20-channel phased-array head coil to acquire resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and high-resolution structural MRI data (T1W image). Neuroimaging data were
preprocessed using the fMRIPrep including co-registered rs-fMRI
reference to T1W image, slice-timing, motion correction, spatial normalization
and smoothing with an isotropic,
Gaussian kernel of 6mm full-width half-maximum.
The automatic removal of motion artifacts using independent component analysis (ICA-AROMA) was further performed on the preprocessed
rs-fMRI data. Finally, the nuisance regression of signals in white matter
and cerebrospinal fluid, detrending
analysis, and bandpass
filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz)
was utilized.
Connectivity-based
parcellation4 was conducted using CBPtools
to segment the entire insula per hemisphere into distinct subdivisions based on
their resting-state functional connectivity patterns with the rest of whole
brain (Figure 1). Briefly, functional connectivity between each insular voxel
and every voxel of the rest brain was calculated for each participant. Then, a
k-means clustering was applied to the connectivity matrix to assign the insular
voxels to a cluster which had the similar connectivity profiles, and obtained
the individual insular parcellations. Next, the group-level clustering was
calculated, including relabeling the individual clusterings and computing the
mode of the relabeled subject-wise clustering. Several cluster
quality indicators including the Silhouette Index, the Calinski-Harabasz
index, and the Davies-Bouldin index, were obtained to determine the optimal
number of clusters.
After identifying the insular subregions, the
intrinsic functional connectivity maps of each insular subregion were generated
for all participants.
The full-factorial
analysis of variance was used to test the
main effect of diagnosis and the diagnosis-by-subregion interaction, with age,
sex and head motion as covariates. The significance
threshold was set to Puncorrected < 0.005 at the voxel-level
and PFWE-corrected < 0.05 at the cluster-level.
Furthermore, we explored the association between clinical variables and rsFC
strength from the regions showing significant interaction in aMDD group via Pearson
or Spearman correlations according to Kolmogorov-Smirnova normal distribution
test.Results
The socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of
the participants were provided in Table 1.
Two subdivisions of insula
(anterior/posterior insula) per hemisphere were identified as the optimal
parcellation through the data-driven CBPtool method based on all the
cluster quality indicators (Figure 2).
Full-factorial analysis
of variance revealed a significant diagnosis-by-subregion interaction in the
left superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Specifically, the aMDD patients showed hypoconnectivity
of bilateral anterior insula with left SFG and hyperconnectivity of bilateral
posterior insula with left SFG (Figure 3), relative to TDC. More interestingly, the
connectivity of left anterior insula and left SFG negatively correlated with
the total scores of Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the connectivity of left
posterior insula and left SFG positively correlated with the Perseverative
errors of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The lower connectivity
of right anterior insula and left SFG correlated with the higher score
in
Interpersonal factor of Adolescent Self-Rating Life Event Check List
(ASLEC) and the lower score in Expressiveness of Family Environment Scale (FES)
(Figure
4). In addition, the main effect of diagnosis was also
observed, with a general enhancement of connectivity between bilateral
insula with orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, temporal
gyrus and hippocampus in aMDD patients compared to TDC.Discussion & Conclusion
Through
the connectivity-based parcellation approach, we found that the two subdivisions
of insula are optimal for adolescents. We demonstrated
that there were the unbalanced connectivity patterns of insular subdivisions with
left SFG in aMDD, which involved in cognitive control and emotion regulation5, 6.
Specifically,
relative to TDC, the aMDD patients showed the hypoconnectivity of bilateral
anterior insula with left SFG (aINS-SFG) and the hyperconnectivity of bilateral
posterior insula with left SFG (pINS-SFG). Furthermore, according to our exploratory
correlation analysis, the decreased connectivity of aINS-SFG was associate with
worse sleep quality, poorer emotional expressiveness and interpersonal
relations, while the increased connectivity of pINS-SFG was related to impaired
cognition in depressive adolescents. These findings suggest that different alterations
in functional architectures of insular subdivisions might underlie the specific
cognitive and affective disturbances in adolescent depression.Acknowledgements
This
study is supported by grants from the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of
Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Grant
No. ZYJC21041), the Clinical and Translational Research Fund of Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 2021-I2M-C&T-B-097),
and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (Grant No.
2022NSFSC0052).References
1. Ghaziri, J., A. Tucholka, G. Girard, et al.,
The Corticocortical Structural Connectivity of the Human Insula.
Cereb Cortex, 2017. 27(2): p.
1216-1228.
2. Tang, S., L. Lu, L. Zhang, et al., Abnormal amygdala resting-state
functional connectivity in adults and adolescents with major depressive
disorder: A comparative meta-analysis. EBioMedicine, 2018. 36: p. 436-445.
3. Cao, L., H. Li, J. Liu, et al., Disorganized functional
architecture of amygdala subregional networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Communications Biology, 2022. 5(1):
p. 1184.
4. Reuter, N., S. Genon, S. Kharabian Masouleh, et al., CBPtools: a
Python package for regional connectivity-based parcellation. Brain Struct
Funct, 2020. 225(4): p. 1261-1275.
5. Frank, D.W., M. Dewitt, M. Hudgens-Haney, et al., Emotion
regulation: quantitative meta-analysis of functional activation and
deactivation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014. 45:
p. 202-11.
6. Niendam, T.A., A.R. Laird, K.L. Ray, et al., Meta-analytic
evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse
executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2012. 12(2): p. 241-68.