Felix Glang1, Anton V. Nikulin1,2, Nikolai Avdievich1, Dario Bosch1,2, Theodor Steffen1, and Klaus Scheffler1,2
1High-field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Synopsis
Keywords: RF Arrays & Systems, High-Field MRI
Parallel imaging with
electronically modulated time-varying receive sensitivities is a novel concept
for improved reconstruction quality and reduced noise amplification.
Previously, it was demonstrated for 2D imaging using reconfigurable surface
loop receive elements. In the present work, we extend the approach to 3D
imaging and for that introduce a reconfigurable single-row dipole receive
array. By using PIN diodes to switch between capacitive and inductive impedance
in the dipole arms, spatially distinct sensitivity profiles are formed that can
be rapidly modulated. This is shown to enable parallel imaging acceleration
along the dipole’s axis and improve reconstruction quality compared to static
sensitivities.
Introduction
We have recently
presented a novel approach of dynamically modulating the receive sensitivity
profiles of surface loop elements during MR signal acquisition for improved
parallel imaging (PI) performance1. The initial study focused on 2D imaging with in-plane sensitivity
variation, where achievable g-factor improvements were limited by partially
overlapping profiles. The objective of the present work is to extend the
approach to 3D imaging with sensitivity variation along the z-axis (head-foot
direction).
For that, we propose a novel RF Rx array coil design based on
reconfigurable folded-end dipole elements, which allows dynamic sensitivity
variation along the dipole’s axis. This is demonstrated to enable the
application of PI along the z-axis with just a single row of receive elements.Methods
dipole array coil design
The array consists of 8 folded-end dipole elements2 equally distributed around a cylindrical surface (diameter 210 mm, Figure
2a). The principle of the reconfigurable dipole element is based on
manipulation of the current distribution along the dipole length (Figure 1a).
For that, an electronically controlled switchable unit (SU) was inserted in
each dipole arm (Figure 1a,b). The SU is based on PIN-diodes (Figure 1b) and
can change its impedance between capacitive and inductive. If the PIN diodes of
one SU are positively biased, the impedance of the SU becomes inductive, which
effectively increases the dipole’s electrical length. In negative bias, the
impedance of the capacitors compensates the inductive impedance and the whole
impedance of the SU becomes capacitive, which corresponds to a decrease in the
electrical length. Switching of the PIN diodes was controlled via a
custom-built CMOS driver connected to the optical trigger output of the scanner
system. Electromagnetic simulations of the dipole array were performed using CST
Studio Suite 2021 (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France).
MR imaging
Data
were acquired on a 9.4T human whole-body MR scanner
(Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using
a 3D RF and gradient spoiled GRE sequence (TR/TE=20ms/8ms, FA=20°, matrix size 200x200x60,
FOV=220mm x 220mm x 120mm, 20% slice oversampling, acquisition time 4min48s). Data were acquired in a cylindrical
phantom and in a healthy subject after written informed consent and under
approval of the local ethics committee.
20-fold
readout oversampling was applied for an ADC dwell time of 1µs, while switching
between the configurations every 10µs. This allows imaging of the repetitive
switching dynamics with 1µs time resolution and thus multiplexing information
from both spatial sensitivity configurations1. To
correct for image artifacts that arise from the switching electronics, robust
PCA3,4 was
applied as described previously1.
Further processing steps comprised
pre-whitening, coil sensitivity extraction (ESPIRIT5, using the central 48x48 k-space lines)
retrospective k-space undersampling and SENSE6 reconstruction for the cases of switched and
static sensitivity configurations. G-factors were calculated according to
equations 2 and 3 in 1.Results
As demonstrated in
Figure 1c for both simulation and measurement, the two configurations result in
distinct asymmetric sensitivity profiles along the dipole axis. In contrast to
a single row of conventional dipoles with symmetric sensitivity profile (Figure
1a, top), switching rapidly between the two asymmetric profiles effectively
emulates two rows of receive elements. This allows using PI acceleration factor
2 along the z-axis while maintaining feasible g-factors, which is not possible
with conventional dipoles (Figure 3).
As a result of the simulations, it turned out that driving the
dipoles in so-called “chess” order (Figure 2b) provided better isolation among
the elements compared to the “direct” order (Figure 2b) and also resulted in
slightly lower g-factors (Figure 3c).
In Figure 4, in vivo parallel imaging results are compared for the
cases of static configurations and rapidly switched configuration for different
acceleration patterns (Ry x Rz). Switching sensitivities yielded an improvement
of maximum g-factors of up to 2.2-fold for 3x2 acceleration, compared to the
worst static configuration case (Figures 4b, 5a). Figure 5b further compares PI
reconstructions with fully sampled ground truth images according to
quantitative reconstruction metrics. According to these, the benefit of
sensitivity switching is especially pronounced for high acceleration factors.Discussion
EM simulations suggest
that the proposed concept is applicable also at 7T and higher fields (10.5T and
11.7T), but becomes less efficient at lower fields. As a drawback, the
presented setup requires additional electronics for controlling the PIN diodes
and wires delivering DC to the dipoles. These wires can interact with the
dipoles and, therefore, have to be mounted with care. In the prospect of future
work, more advanced reconfigurable dipole element geometries can allow even
stronger modulation of B1- both in-plane and along the z-axis to further
improve parallel imaging performance.Conclusion
We have demonstrated a
dynamic single-row dipole receive array that permits rapid sensitivity
modulations along the dipole’s axes. Applying dynamic sensitivity modulation
during image acquisition emulates two rows of receive elements along the
z-direction, and, thus, improves parallel imaging performance for 3D
acquisitions.Acknowledgements
We thank Rui Tian for helping with the experimental setup. Financial
support of the Max-Planck-Society, ERC Advanced Grant “SpreadMRI”, No 834940
and DFG Grant SCHE 658/12 is gratefully acknowledged.References
1. Glang F, Nikulin AV, Bause J,
et al. Accelerated MRI at 9.4 T with electronically modulated time-varying
receive sensitivities. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022;88:742–756 doi:
10.1002/mrm.29245.
2. Avdievich NI, Solomakha G,
Ruhm L, Scheffler K, Henning A. Evaluation of short folded dipole antennas as
receive elements of ultra-high-field human head array. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 2019;82:811–824 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27754.
3. Candes EJ, Li X, Ma Y, Wright
J. Robust Principal Component Analysis? arXiv:0912.3599 [cs, math] 2009.
4. Aravkin A, Becker S, Cevher V,
Olsen P. A variational approach to stable principal component pursuit. In:
Conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI); 2014.
5. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et
al. ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE
meets GRAPPA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2014;71:990–1001 doi:
10.1002/mrm.24751.
6. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger
MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 1999;42:952–962 doi:
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S.