Rui Vasco Simoes1,2, Rafael N Henriques1, Jonas L Olesen3,4, Beatriz M Cardoso1, Francisca F Fernandes1, Tania Carvalho1, Sune N Jespersen3,4, and Noam Shemesh1
1Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal, 2(Present Address) Preclinical MRI, Institute for Research & Innovation in Health (i3S), Porto, Portugal, 3Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors, Deuterium, glioma
Dynamic glucose-enhanced deuterium MRS (DGE
2H-MRS) coupled with
Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MPPCA) denoising has been recently applied to immunocompetent
mouse glioblastoma subtypes (GL261 and
CT2A), demonstrating the ability to measure glucose metabolism through glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation non-invasively,
and its association with tumor proliferation. Here, we
extend this approach to DGE Deuterium Metabolic Imaging (DGE-DMI)
coupled with tensor MPPCA (tMPPCA) denoising, to map glucose fluxes in the same
mouse models of glioblastoma. Our results demonstrate a strong association
between glycolytic rates and MRI and histologic features of inter/intra-tumor
heterogeneity.
INTRODUCTION
Glioblastoma (GBM) are
aggressive brain tumors with poor prognosis, largely due to their intrinsic
heterogeneity and lack of non-invasive methods to assess it [1]. To address this gap, dynamic glucose-enhanced deuterium spectroscopy (DGE 2H-MRS)
was previously harnessed with Marchenko-Pastur Principal Component Analysis
(MPPCA) denoising [2-4], demonstrating its ability to differentially quantify glucose turnover
rates through glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation in mouse glioblastoma, and modulation of these
pathways fluxes in vivo according to tumor cell proliferation [5]. Here, we expand this approach to DGE Deuterium
Metabolic Imaging (DGE-DMI) [6, 7] coupled with tensor MPPCA (tMPPCA) denoising [8]. Thus, we investigate for the first time the links
between glucose metabolic fluxes and heterogeneity features of the tumor
microenvironment and its surrounding tissues in mouse glioblastoma.METHODS
GBM tumors in vivo and post-mortem
All animal experiments were
preapproved by institutional and national authorities, and carried out
according to European Directive 2010/63. GBM tumors were
induced in immunocompetent C57BL6/j mice by intracranial stereotactic injection of 1E5 glioma cells
(GL261, n=5; or CT2A, n=5) in the caudate nucleus [9]. The animals were
monitored for tumor growth at 1 T (Bruker Icon) and studied 2-6 weeks post-inoculation at 9.4 T (Bruker BioSpec), using a customized 2H/1H
transmit-receive surface coilset (NeosBiotec). Fasted mice (4-6h) were
cannulated in the tail vein and placed in the animal holder (1-2% isoflurane in
29% O2; rectal temperature 36-37ºC; breathing 60-80BPM. DGE-DMI was acquired with
slice-FID CSI (10kHz SLR excitation pulse, 55º flip angle, 2.27 slice
thickness, with final in-plane resolution 560×560 µm2, 175ms TR, 256 complex points, BW=1749 Hz), following a 6,6′-2H2-glucose
i.v. bolus injection (2 g/Kg). Each animal further underwent T2-w (RARE: 3s TR, 40ms TE, Turbo-8, 1mm slice thickness, 70×70
µm2 resolution) and DCE-T1 MRI (FLASH: 8º flip-angle, 16ms TR, 2.27mm slice
thickness, 140×140 µm2 resolution; Gd-DOTA i.v. bolus, 0.1 mmol/Kg), to assess tumor
volume and tissue perfusion, respectively. Finally, animals were sacrificed, the brains were removed, washed in PBS and immersed in 4%
PFA until paraffin embedding, 1 week later. Samples were sectioned for histology
and digitalization.
Data analyses
DGE-DMI data
were processed in MATLABR R2018b and jMRUI 6.0b. This included tMPPCA
denoising [8] and spectral
quantification using AMARES and DHO reference (natural abundance) [5], with quality control based on
Cremer-Rao Lower Bounds (<50%) and SNR of the initial DHO peak (SNRi >3). Data
were analyzed voxel-wise with kinetic modeling to generate glucose flux
maps through glycolysis (glucose-to-lactate)
and mitochondrial oxidation (glucose-to-glutamine-glutamate), as recently reported [5]; additionally, average concentration
maps [10] were generated for glucose, lactate,
and glutamine-glutamate. DCE T1-MRI data
were analyzed with DCE@urLab [11], using the Extended
Tofts model to derive tissue perfusion (ktrans). Histopathological
analyses (H&E staining) were
performed independently by an experimental pathologist,
and semi-automated cell counting performed on immunostained sections (ki67)
with QuPath 0.2.3, as before [5]. Groups
were compared using the two-tailed Student’s t-test, and correlation
analyses performed with the Pearson R coefficient.RESULTS
DGE-DMI
achieved good spatio-temporal resolutions in
CT2A and GL261 cohorts (~3
µL/voxel, 12 min/spectrum) and spectral SNRi was increased by 3-fold
(p<0.001) after tMPPCA denoising (Fig. 1). This
improved the overall quality of the estimated glucose flux
maps (Fig. 2), based on pixel
detectability: +38.3±9.7%
and +62.2±19.2% (p<0.01), for CT2A and GL261, respectively (Fig. 3). Despite the
histopathologic differences in cell morphology and stromal-vascular phenotypes verified
between the two glioblastoma models, tissue perfusion correlated pixel-wise with glycolysis
rate, within each subject (0.585 < R < 0.824) (Fig. 4); whereas tumor
volume (58.5±7.2 mm3) and total tissue cellularity correlated
strongly across subjects with glucose
consumption and glycolysis rates, in each cohort and in pooled cohorts (0.574 <
R < 0.984) (Fig. 5). These associations were overall weaker without tMPPCA denoising (0.512 < R < 0.804 and 0.267 <
R < 0.935), respectively),
and not consistent for glucose,
lactate, and glutamine-glutamate concentration maps.DISCUSSION
DGE-DMI
coupled with tMPPCA denoising generates glucose
flux maps, which are associated with perfusion and histologic features of
inter/intra-tumor heterogeneity in glioblastoma-bearing mouse brains. Importantly,
such correlations were inconsistent for metabolite concentration maps (rather
than pathway fluxes). CONCLUSION
By probing the glioma
microenvironment and its surrounding tissues, these results complement our
previous findings with localized deuterium spectroscopy exclusively in the
tumor region [5]. Given the application of glucose-enhanced DMI to glioblastoma
patients [10], and to healthy subjects at 9.4 Tesla [12], this
methodology is clinically translatable holding strong potential for precision
oncology.Acknowledgements
This work was supported
by H2020-MSCA-IF-2018, ref. 844776 (RVS); and Champalimaud Foundation. The authors thank the Vivarium of
the Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, a research infrastructure of CONGENTO
co-financed by Lisbon Regional Operational Programme (Lisboa2020), under
the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional
Development Fund (ERDF) and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
(Portugal), under the project LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-022170. References
1. Wen, P.Y. and S. Kesari, Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J
Med, 2008. 359(5): p. 492-507.
2. Veraart,
J., et al., Denoising of diffusion MRI
using random matrix theory. Neuroimage, 2016. 142: p. 394-406.
3. Clarke,
W.T. and M. Chiew, Uncertainty in
denoising of MRSI using low-rank methods. Magn Reson Med, 2022. 87(2): p. 574-588.
4. Mosso,
J., et al., MP-PCA denoising for
diffusion MRS data: promises and pitfalls. Neuroimage, 2022. 263: p. 119634.
5. Simoes,
R.V., et al., Glucose fluxes in
glycolytic and oxidative pathways detected in vivo by deuterium magnetic
resonance spectroscopy reflect proliferation in mouse glioblastoma.
Neuroimage Clin, 2022. 33: p.
102932.
6. Kreis,
F., et al., Measuring Tumor Glycolytic
Flux in Vivo by Using Fast Deuterium MRI. Radiology, 2020. 294(2): p. 289-296.
7. Lu,
M., et al., Quantitative assessment of
brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium magnetic resonance
spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2017. 37(11): p. 3518-3530.
8. Olesen,
J.L., et al., Tensor denoising of
multidimensional MRI data. Magn Reson Med, 2022.
9. Simões,
R.V., et al., Perturbation of mouse
glioma MRS pattern by induced acute hyperglycemia. NMR Biomed, 2008. 21(3): p. 251-64.
10. De Feyter, H.M., et al., Deuterium
metabolic imaging (DMI) for MRI-based 3D mapping of metabolism in vivo. Sci
Adv, 2018. 4(8): p. eaat7314.
11. Ortuno, J.E., et al., DCE@urLAB:
a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic analysis tool for preclinical
data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2013. 14(1):
p. 316.
12. Ruhm, L., et al., Deuterium
metabolic imaging in the human brain at 9.4 Tesla with high spatial and
temporal resolution. Neuroimage, 2021. 244:
p. 118639.