Courtney Joy Comrie1, Samantha Schatz1, Kevin Johnson1, Scott Squire1, Nan-kuei Chen1, and Elizabeth Hutchinson1
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Data Acquisition, Alzheimer's Disease
Diffusion MRI has been identified as a promising
tool for identifying novel and early makers of AD and comorbid pathology. This
study worked towards translating advanced microstructural techniques to clinical
acquisitions for the purpose of potential AD diagnosis. High resolution
diffusion human data was acquired using a 4-way phase-encoding and specialized
hippocampal FOV in healthy subjects for method development. High quality maps
were achieved that revealed more hippocampal microstructural information than
what is acquired in database protocols according to preliminary results.
Introduction
The identification of sensitive and specific
brain imaging markers is a primary goal for neuroimaging in Alzheimer’s disease
(AD). While advanced microstructural MRI approaches – especially non-Gaussian
diffusion and multi-compartment relaxometry MRI methods – are conceptually
appealing to report and differentiate cellular and macromolecular pathology,
they have not been overly successful. Previously, we identified promising
microstructural MRI markers in post-mortem tissue utilizing diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI), neurite orientation dispersion imaging (NODDI), and mean
apparent propagator (MAP)-MRI at high resolution and image quality 1, but for
these observations of promising markers to become clinically relevant, it is
essential to migrate high-resolution and high b-value acquisition for use in
human patients. The objective of this study was to optimize a
hippocampus-specific diffusion MRI acquisition paradigm and processing pipeline
to enable translation of DTI, NODDI, and MAP-MRI methods from post-mortem study
to in-vivo clinically feasible MRI protocols on a human MRI scanner.Methods
Healthy volunteers were recruited both
for the MR battery development (n=9), and a test-retest reliability (n=5)
acquisition where volunteers participated for two separate scan sessions to
compare subject variability of microstructural MRI maps. Scans were developed
on a 3T Skyra Siemens Scanner in the Translational Bioimaging Resources (TBIR)
at the University of Arizona. A reduced field of view (FOV) strategy was used
for all scans where slices were strategically placed according to the main axis
of the hippocampus 2 and with 1x1x1.5mm voxel resolution. Efficient and
high-quality diffusion MRI scans were the focus of development including 4PAT
acceleration and 4-way phase acquisition (A-P, P-A, L-R, R-L) using bvalues
250, 500, and 1000 with 124 directions (figure 1) 3. A high angular
resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) shell was also acquired with 2-way phase
acquisition (L-R, R-L) with b=3000s/mm3, 64 directions, and voxel size of 2x2x3
mm (upsampled to 1x1x1.5mm during processing).
Diffusion data were corrected for
motion (DIFFPREP) and distortion (DRBUDDI) artifacts using TORTOISE 3.1.4 4 which
combines all phase direction groupings (figure 2). All diffusion data was
concatenated before estimating the diffusion tensor and mean apparent
propagator to derive fractional anisotropy (FA), Trace (TR) 5 propagator
anisotropy (PA), return-to-orgin probability (RTOP) 6. Additionally, neurite
orientation dispersion density imaging (NODDI) was performed to estimate orientation
dispersion index (ODI) 7. For analysis, a template was created using
DTI-based registration (DRTAMAS) from the 10 diffusion tensor files of the
test-retest dataset.
A preliminary analysis was conducted
on the FA and PA maps using two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients
(ICC2) with hippocampal region of interests (ROIs). Additionally, observational
differences were made between healthy volunteer FA maps collected from the
National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) and our acquisitions methods.Results
Desired quality and resolution were achieved for
DTI, MAP-MRI, and NODDI maps using the reduced FOV strategy for high-resolution
hippocampal imaging (figure 3). Preliminary results from ICC2 analysis for
fractional anisotropy (FA), produced an ICC2 value of 0.71 and propagator
anisotropy (PA) had an ICC2 of 0.67 (figure 4). Additional comparisons were
made between an FA map calculated from a single healthy brain from the NACC and
an FA map from a single volunteer in this study. More microstructural
information is readily available in the hippocampus utilizing the methods in this
study than in the techniques used by NACC databases (figure 5). The white
matter track in the hippocampus was more apparent and detailed in data acquired
in this study than the healthy brain from the NACC database.Discussion
Correction of geometric distortions and improvement in DWI image
quality (i.e. SNR) were successful using 4-way phase correction and image re-combination.
Additionally, MAP-MRI and NODDI modeling were both successful using the
multi-shell and multi-resolution strategies developed in this study.
Preliminary reproducibility data of the hippocampus in FA and PA showed low
intraclass variability for participants with a ICC2. Providing promising
initial results on the methods reliability with the desired image quality to
visualize the hippocampus.
Subjective comparison with conventional whole brain DTI from
repository data demonstrated not only improved resolution with the proposed
acquisition and pipeline, but also increase contrast of dMRI metric values in
the hippocampus. The delineation of subfield values for advanced dMRI metrics
(e.g. by MAP-MRI) may offer an important target to develop early AD markers and
markers to distinguish among comorbid pathologies.Conclusion
High resolution and high-quality diffusion maps in DTI, NODDI, and
MAPMRI was achieved through our developed acquisition methods and processing
pipeline for hippocampal dMRI. Anisotropy metrics from DTI and MAP-MRI were
reliable with subjects, which is essential for high quality mapping and future
longitudinal patent studies. Translating promising metrics from post-mortem findings
to human imaging, focused on the hippocampus provides potential methods for
early diagnosis of AD. Future directions include comparison of this method with
existing whole brain dMRI as well as direct comparisons with post-mortem tissue
to improve the development of novel dMRI markers of AD.Acknowledgements
This work was generously supported by the
Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium. The authors thank the BME department,
Translational Bioimaging Resource, and High Performance Computing (HPC) for
providing the resources needed. A special thanks to all the MBSIL members,
Maria Altbach, and Ali Bilgin for their support.References
-
Comrie
CJ, Dieckhaus LA, Beach T, Serrano G and Hutchinson EB.
Microstructural MR Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology in Post-Mortem
Human Temporal Lobe. Oral Presentation. May 2022, ISMRM, London.
- Treit
S, Steve T, Gross DW, Beaulieu C. High resolution in-vivo diffusion
imaging of the human hippocampus. Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;182:479-487.
- Irfanoglu
MO, Sadeghi N, Sarlls J, Pierpaoli C. Improved reproducibility of
diffusion MRI of the human brain with a four-way blip-up and down
phase-encoding acquisition approach. Magn Reson Med. 2021
May;85(5):2696-2708. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28624. Epub 2020 Dec 16. PMID:
33331068; PMCID: PMC7898925.
- Irfanoglu
MO, Nayak A, Jenkins J, Pierpaoli C. TORTOISE v3: Improvements and New
Features of the NIH. 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medcine. Published online 2017.
- Basser
PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.
Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):259-67. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1.
PMID: 8130344; PMCID: PMC1275686.
- Avram
AV, Sarlls JE, Barnett AS, et al. Clinical feasibility of using mean
apparent propagator (MAP) MRI to characterize brain tissue microstructure.
NeuroImage. 2016;127:422-434. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.027.
- Zhang,
H., et al., NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and
density imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage, 2012. 61(4): p. 1000-1016.