Liu Suwei1
1Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Skeletal, Skeletal
Our study aimed to develop and validate one or more clinically relevant
radiomic nomograms based on multisequence MRI radiomic features to predict the
pre-treatment HRC status of patients with MM. We developed radiomic nomograms
for 14 models at a single center using clinically obtained whole-spine MRI
images of 159 patients with MM. This study revealed that radiomic features of
pre-treatment MRI images are associated with HRC status in patients with MM.
Among the proposed models, the nomograms of the FT2, FT2+1, and FT2+2+1 models
were identified as outstanding at distinguishing patients with HRC from those
with non-HRC status.
Abstract
Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is
a highly heterogeneous disease caused by a series of genetic and epigenetic
events. It is the second most common hematologic malignancy after lymphoma and
is associated with approximately 100,000 deaths annually worldwide (1).
Cytogenic abnormalities (CA) are observed in almost all patients with MM (2).
CA is an independent risk
factor affecting the prognosis of MM (3).
In addition, it has been
shown that clonal heterogeneity and clonal evolution tend to be pronounced in
these patients (4). Second, CA status can be used to assess response to
therapy (5), the RVd regimen
(lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone) is the backbone of MM chemotherapy (6); it has been associated with complete remission
rates in up to 50% of patients. However, patients with HRC are usually
resistant to chemotherapy with the RVd regimen (7). In contrast, induction, consolidation, and
maintenance therapy using autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
combined with KRd regimens (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) can
improve survival rates up to 72% (8). Therefore, CA status is crucial for the selection
of a MM treatment regimen and assessment of treatment outcome.
The diagnosis
of CA relies on the collection of tissue specimens and molecular biology tests
such as fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)(9, 10). However, obtaining tissue specimens for CA
testing usually requires bone marrow aspiration biopsy, which is invasive and
may cause complications such as bleeding and infection in patients with
hematologic disorders. Other limitations of this method include inadequate or
inappropriate tissue sampling due to tumor spatial heterogeneity.
In addition, the process of
histological specimen analysis is cumbersome, complex, and expensive.
Therefore, novel non-invasive methods of CA status determination are required.
Radiomics is a
high-throughput extraction and computational analysis method used to obtain
potentially valuable high-dimensional information about tumor heterogeneity
from medical images in a manner that is superior to that of the human eye (11). The value of radiomic features as imaging
predictors for cancer diagnosis, treatment response, and prognosis, including in
MM, has been demonstrated (12). Two previous studies have suggested the
feasibility of using whole-spine MRI-based radiomics to predict high-risk
cytogenetic (HRC) status (13, 14). However, these two studies were small (n=50 or
89) and failed to construct clinically applicable nomograms. Consequently,
further studies are required in this field. This study aimed to develop and
validate one or more clinically relevant radiomic nomograms based on
multisequence MRI radiomic features to predict the pre-treatment HRC status of patients
with MM.
Materials and methods: Patients with MM (71 and 88 HRC and non-HRC,
respectively) identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization were randomly
divided into training (n=111) and test (n=48) sets. The regions of interest(ROIs) was assessed by
T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and fat-suppressed
T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) in the sagittal position. The ROIs were
determined and manually labeled by three readers. 14 models(combined radiomics
models: T1, T2, FT2, T1+2, FT2+1,
FT2+2, and FT2+2+1 models; radiomics models: T1-age,
T2-age, FT2-age, T1+2-age, FT2+1-age,
FT2+2-age, and FT2+2+1-age models) using linear logistic
regression were developed using T1WI、T2WI and FS-T2WI to stratify of CA in MM. Nomogram
performance was evaluated and compared using C-index,bootstrapping,
accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative
predictive value, and Akaike information criterion.
Results: The FT2 single-sequence model, FT2+1
double-sequence model, and FT2+2+1 multisequence model radiomics
nomograms excelled at predicting HRC; the training set C-index of 0.80, 0.84 and
0.88, the test set C-index of 0.80, 0.84 and 0.84, respectively.
These improvements to the C-indexes were validated using the 1000-times
bootstrapping method;
Favorable clinical application was observed using decision curve analysis.
Conclusions: The
FT2 single-sequence, FT2+1 double-sequence, and FT2+2+1
multisequence models performed well at differentiating HRC and non-HRC states
of MM. We present a non-invasive radiomics approach to determine the HRC status
of patients with MM prior to treatment using clinically acquired
multiparametric MRI images. The results of this study may aid clinical
decision-making, including individualized treatment planning for MM.Acknowledgements
Suwei LiuReferences
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal
A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7-33
2. Soekojo CY, Chung TH, Furqan MS, Chng
WJ. Genomic characterization of functional high-risk multiple myeloma patients.
Blood Cancer J 2022;12:24
3. Hose D, Beck S, Salwender H, Emde M,
Bertsch U, Kunz C et al. Prospective target assessment and multimodal
prediction of survival for personalized and risk-adapted treatment strategies
in multiple myeloma in the gmmg-mm5 multicenter trial. J Hematol Oncol
2019;12:65
4. Neuse CJ, Lomas OC, Schliemann C,
Shen YJ, Manier S, Bustoros M et al. Genome instability in multiple myeloma.
Leukemia 2020;34:2887-2897
5. Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial
S, Usmani S, Siegel D, Anderson KC et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with
high-risk cytogenetics: A consensus of the international myeloma working group.
Blood 2016;127:2955-2962
6. Cowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M, Lee S,
Coffey DG, Holmberg LA et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: A
review. Jama 2022;327:464-477
7. Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM,
Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N et al. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and
dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: Mrc myeloma ix
randomized trial results. Haematologica 2012;97:442-450
8. Kumar SK, Jacobus SJ, Cohen AD, Weiss
M, Callander N, Singh AK et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with
lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple
myeloma without intention for immediate autologous stem-cell transplantation
(endurance): A multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.
Lancet Oncol 2020;21:1317-1330
9. Smith SC, Althof PA, Dave BJ, Sanmann
JN. High-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma: Further scrutiny of deletions
within the igh gene region enhances risk stratification. Genes Chromosomes
Cancer 2020;59:569-574
10. Callander NS, Baljevic M, Adekola K,
Anderson LD, Campagnaro E, Castillo JJ et al. Nccn guidelines® insights:
Multiple myeloma, version 3.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022;20:8-19
11. Gardin I, Grégoire V, Gibon D, Kirisli
H, Pasquier D, Thariat J et al. Radiomics: Principles and radiotherapy
applications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019;138:44-50
12. Guiot J, Vaidyanathan A, Deprez L,
Zerka F, Danthine D, Frix AN et al. A review in radiomics: Making personalized
medicine a reality via routine imaging. Med Res Rev 2022;42:426-440
13. Liu J, Zeng P, Guo W, Wang C, Geng Y,
Lang N et al. Prediction of high-risk cytogenetic status in multiple myeloma
based on magnetic resonance imaging: Utility of radiomics and comparison of
machine learning methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:1303-1311
14. Liu J, Wang C, Guo W, Zeng P, Liu Y,
Lang N et al. A preliminary study using spinal mri-based radiomics to predict
high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma. Radiol Med
2021;126:1226-1235