Jia Yuping1 and Dou Weiqiang2
1Lixia District, Jinan city, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan, Jinan, China, 2MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Data Analysis, Cancer
This study aimed to use intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) DWI
with different mathematical models to predict
rectal adenomas with and without canceration. The parameters of different IVIM-DWI
models, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from mono-exponential
model, true diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient and perfusion
fraction from bi-exponential model, and the distributed diffusion coefficient
and water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index from stretched-exponential
model were compared between 31 adenoma and 29 adenoma with canceration. We
found that mono-exponential derived ADC can easily predict rectal adenomas with canceration, and bi-exponential model has
a better combination of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing rectal
adenoma canceration.
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the
third most common cancer worldwide1. Early
detection of colorectal adenoma, a precancerous lesion of CRC, can reduce CRC
incidence 2. Colonoscopy is a widely applied method for
detecting rectal adenomas in clinic3. But colonoscopy
cannot evaluate heterogeneity inside tumor or the invasion depth of rectal wall4. Intravoxel incoherent
motion (IVIM) DWI uses multi-b values to reflect tissue dispersion and micro-perfusion5 with different mathematic
models. Varied patterns of IVIM
parameters, derived such as from mono-exponential model (ME), bi-exponential
model (BE) and stretched-exponential model (SE), have been reported to
relate with the enlargement of cell nucleus, tight arrangement of cells and
proliferation of new blood vessels in cancer tissues, affecting the dispersion
and pre-fusion of water molecules6,7. Moreover, IVIM has been used
to identify rectal cancer patients with micro-nodal involvement before surgery.
With these promising evidences, it remains however unknown if the IVIM-DWI is also feasible to predict
rectal adenomas with canceration. Therefore, the main goal of study was to investigate
if IVIM-DWI
with different
mathematical models was
feasible to preoperatively predict rectal adenoma with canceration.Materials and Methods
Subjects
31 adenoma patients (15 male and 16 female, mean age 61.87±10.60) and 29 adenoma with canceration patients (17 male
and 12 female, mean age 62.59±13.32) were included in this
study. The lesions of all patients were confirmed by postoperative pathology.
Each participant underwent IVIM-DWI scanning before surgery.
MRI experiments
All patients underwent MRI measurements on a 3.0 T system (Discovery 750w; GE
Healthcare) using an eight-channel phased-array body coil in the supine
position. Fast spin echo (FSE)
T2WIs were separately performed in the sagittal,coronal and oblique views.
Axial spin-echo
echo-planar-image based IVIM-DWI scanning was performed with 11 b-values
applied, namely 0, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1500 s/mm2. The number of excitation (NEX)
was 2 for b values of 20, 50, 100, and 150 s/mm2 , 4 for b values of 0, 200, 400, 600, 1000 and 1500 s/mm2; and 6 for b value of 800 s/mm2 . The total
scan time was 21 mins.
Image Analysis
All
MR data were transferred to Advantage Workstation (version AW 4.6, GE Medical
Systems). IVIM-DWI data were post-processed in ME, BE and SE models with a
vendor-provided software (Function tool MADC; GE Healthcare). Parametric
mappings of ME-derived
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), BE-derived true diffusion coefficient
(D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), SE-derived
distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), and water molecular diffusion
heterogeneity index (α) were obtained accordingly. Two radiologists were blinded
to the clinical and pathological information, and independently drew the regions of interest (ROI)s. Referring to the T2WI, the regions-of-interest
(ROIs) were manually sketched on the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor,
excluding necrosis and cystic lesions, on diffusion images at b-value of 1000s/mm2.
All ROIs were selected in size between 50 and 500 mm2 (Figure 1).
Statistical
analysis
All
statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and
MedCalc 11.4 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium). The independent-sample t-test or
Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare IVIM parameters between adenoma group and
canceration group. The independent
risk factors were separated using multivariate binary logistic regression
analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to
evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter by obtaining the area
under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Significant
threshold was set as p < 0.05.Results
ADC, D, D*, f, DDC and α with intraclass
correlation coefficient of 0.929, 0.950, 0.919, 0.912, 0.879, and 0.953
respectively, were proven to achieve excellent measurement repeatability over
two radiologists.
ADC, D, f, DDC and α showed lower
values in canceration patients compared to those without canceration, while an
opposite pattern was found in D* value (all p<0.05;Table 1).
Moreover, each of ADC, D, f, and DDC
values was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for adenoma
canceration (P = 0.011, 0.002, 0.031, and 0.012, respectively). Through ROC analysis, ME, BE, and SE
models have showed robust diagnostic efficacies, with respective AUCs of 0.851,
0.927 and 0.874. In terms of diagnosing adenoma canceration, BE model offered a better combination of sensitivity and specificity (86.3% and 96.8%); and the combined model, which included ADC,
D, f and DDC, showed the highest sensitivity (96.6%). (Table 2, Figure 2).Discussion and conclusions
In this study, significantly
different IVIM parameters of ADC, D,
f, and DDC were revealed between adenoma and adenoma with canceration. We speculated that the nuclei of canceration cells are
enlarged, the cells are closely arranged, and new blood vessels are increased, thus
affecting the dispersion and micro-perfusion. Furthermore, the ME, BE and SEM models
employed in this study all provided robust performances in diagnosing adenoma
canceration. Among these, ME-derived ADC was
considered to be an easy and effective method in predicting adenomas with canceration, and BE
model offered a better combination of sensitivity and
specificity.
In
conclusion, ADC values can be used to predict rectal
adenomas with canceration. Increasing the complexity of the IVIM-DWI model unable to
dramatically increase diagnostic effectiveness.Acknowledgements
My special thanks go to thank Dr. Weiqiang Dou of GE Healthcare for careful review of my dissertation and his valuable
comments.References
1.Siegel RL,
Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30.
2. Chan SCH,
Liang JQ. Advances in tests for colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2022;22(4):449-60.
3.
Kouladouros K, Baral J. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal
dissection (TEM-ESD) for recurrent rectal adenomas. Dig Dis. 2022.
4. Chen
Y, Li B, Jiang Z, et al. Multi-parameter
diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics nomogram for
preoperative evaluation of aquaporin-1 expression in rectal cancer. Abdom
Radiol (NY). 2022;47(4):1276-90.
5. Le Bihan D,
Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR
imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and
perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986;161(2):401-7.
6. Zhang Q, Ouyang H, Ye F, et al. Multiple mathematical models of
diffusion-weighted imaging for endometrial cancer characterization: Correlation
with prognosis-related risk factors. Eur J Radiol. 2020;130:109102.
7. Zhu Q, Ren C, Xu JJ, et al. Whole-lesion histogram analysis
of mono-exponential and bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging in
differentiating lung cancer from benign pulmonary lesions using 3 T MRI. Clin
Radiol. 2021;76(11):846-53.