Keywords: Liver, Fat
3D self-navigated multi-echo stack-of-radial Dixon sequence has been used to quantify fat and R2* with free-breathing acquisitions. To compensate motion, motion-resolved compressed sensing (CS) uses self-navigation for data binning, and applies sparsity constraint along the dimension of motion states. However, this approach does not explicitly model non-rigid motion in the liver. In addition to artifacts caused by respiratory motion, hardware imperfection such as gradient nonlinearity can lead to artifacts and affect the image quality. In this work, use a phase-preserving beamforming-based coil sensitivity estimation method and non-rigid motion compensation in a CS model to improve free-breathing PDFF and R2* quantification.
[1] Armstrong T, Dregely I, Stemmer A, Han F, Natsuaki Y, Sung K, Wu HH. Free‐breathing liver fat quantification using a multiecho 3 D stack‐of‐radial technique. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018;79(1):370-382.
[2] Zhong X, Armstrong T, Nickel MD, Kannengiesser SA, Pan L, Dale BM, Deshpande V, Kiefer B, Wu HH. Effect of respiratory motion on free‐breathing 3D stack‐of‐radial liver relaxometry and improved quantification accuracy using self‐gating. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2020;83(6):1964-1978.
[3] Armstrong T, Zhong X, Shih S-F, Felker E, Lu DS, Dale BM, Wu HH. Free-breathing 3D stack-of-radial MRI quantification of liver fat and R2* in adults with fatty liver disease. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2022;85:141-152.
[4] Feng L, Axel L, Chandarana H, Block KT, Sodickson DK, Otazo R. XD‐GRASP: golden‐angle radial MRI with reconstruction of extra motion‐state dimensions using compressed sensing. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016;75(2):775-788.
[5] Tolouee A, Alirezaie J, Babyn P. Nonrigid motion compensation in compressed sensing reconstruction of cardiac cine MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging, 2018;46:114-120.
[6] Zhu X, Chan M, Lustig M, Johnson KM, Larson PEZ. Iterative motion‐compensation reconstruction ultra‐short TE (iMoCo UTE) for high‐resolution free‐breathing pulmonary MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2020;83(4):1208-1221.
[7] Mandava S, Keerthivasan MB, Martin DR, Altbach MI, Bilgin A. Radial streak artifact reduction using phased array beamforming. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2019;81(6):3915-3923.
[8] Shih S-F, Wu HH. A Beamforming-Based Coil Combination Method to Reduce Streaking Artifacts and Preserve Phase Fidelity in Radial MRI. 30th Annual Meeting of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. London, UK; 2022.
[9] Thirion, J-P. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Medical image analysis 1998: 243-260.
[10] Hernando D, Kellman P, Haldar JP, Liang, ZP. Robust water/fat separation in the presence of large field inhomogeneities using a graph cut algorithm. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010;63(1):79-90.
[11] Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2000;43(5):682-690.
Figure 1. (a) Reconstruction pipeline for self-gated free-breathing PDFF and R2* quantification with motion-resolved CS and non-rigid motion compensation. (b) Pipeline for beamforming-based coil sensitivity map estimation with deep learning-based automatic interference patch selection.
Figure 2. Representative self-gated images, motion-resolved CS reconstructed images and the corresponding proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) maps with (a) conventional adaptive coil combination, and (b) phase-preserving beamforming-based method. Residual streakings (coming from the arm outside the field of view) can be observed in CS reconstructed images and PDFF maps that did not use beamforming-based coil sensitivity maps (red arrow).
Figure 3. (a,b) Images and quantitative maps from different reconstruction methods using conventional adaptive coil combination. CS models cannot fully suppress the specific streaking patterns from the arms (red arrows). CS with non-rigid motion compensation has less streaking compared to motion-resolved CS. (c,d) Reconstruction results using phase-preserving beamforming-based coil sensitivity maps. Orange zoomed-in patches show that CS non-rigid motion compensation can better suppress the artifacts. (*pre-scan time for trajectory calibration not included.)
Figure 4. (a,b) Images and quantitative maps from different reconstruction methods using adaptive coil combination. CS models cannot fully suppress the specific streaking patterns from the arms (red arrows). CS with non-rigid motion compensation has less streaking compared to motion-resolved CS. (c,d) Reconstruction results using phase-preserving beamforming-based method. The image and maps show less streaking artifacts compared to results in (a) and (b). (*pre-scan time for trajectory calibration not included.)
Figure 5. Comparison of images and quantitative maps in the coronal reformats from the same subject in Figure 3. CS with non-rigid motion compensation can provide results with reduced artifacts (orange zoomed-in patches). (*pre-scan time for trajectory calibration not included.)