Keywords: Neonatal, Normal development, brain network
The study aimed to explore the changes of dynamic functional network connectivity (FNC) with age in neonatal brain. We used independent component analysis to extract 17 resting-state networks, and calculated their static and dynamic FNC (sFNC/dFNC). We found that the variance of dFNC significantly correlated with GA, and the sFNC significantly correlated with PMA controlling GA as a covariate. Moreover, the preterm- than term-born neonates showed decreased variances of dFNC between almost all networks, and altered sFNC between several networks. These findings suggest that the time-varying FNCs are modulated more by maternal environment than postnatal experience during early brain development.1. Eyre M, Fitzgibbon SP, Ciarrusta J, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Poppe T, Schuh A, Hughes E, O'Keeffe C, Brandon J, Cromb D, Vecchiato K, Andersson J, Duff EP, Counsell SJ, Smith SM, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, Arichi T, O'Muircheartaigh J, Batalle D, Edwards AD. The Developing Human Connectome Project: typical and disrupted perinatal functional connectivity. Brain. 2021;144(7):2199-2213.
2. Sun F, Zhao Z, Lan M, Xu Y, Huang M, Xu D. Abnormal dynamic functional network connectivity of the mirror neuron system network and the mentalizing network in patients with adolescent-onset, first-episode, drug-naïve schizophrenia. Neurosci Res. 2021; 162:63-70.
3. Smith‐Collins, A. P., Luyt, K., Heep, A., & Kauppinen, R. A. High frequency functional brain networks in neonates revealed by rapid acquisition resting state fMRI. Hum Brian Mapp. 2015; 36(7):2483-2494.
4. Zhi, D., Calhoun, V. D., Lv, L., Ma, X., Ke, Q., Fu, Z., ... & Sui, J. Aberrant dynamic functional network connectivity and graph properties in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2018; 9: 339.
5. Fitzgibbon SP, Harrison SJ, Jenkinson M, Baxter L, Robinson EC, Bastiani M, Bozek J, Karolis V, Cordero Grande L, Price AN, Hughes E, Makropoulos A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Schuh A, Gao J, Farahibozorg SR, O'Muircheartaigh J, Ciarrusta J, O'Keeffe C, Brandon J, Arichi T, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Smith SM, Duff E, Andersson J. The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) automated resting-state functional processing framework for newborn infants. Neuroimage. 2020; 223:117303.
6. Nickerson LD, Smith SM, Öngür D, Beckmann CF. Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017; 11:115.
7. Thomason, M. E., Dassanayake, M. T., Shen, S., Katkuri, Y., Alexis, M., Anderson, A. L., ... & Romero, R. Cross-hemispheric functional connectivity in the human fetal brain. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(173): 173ra24-173ra24.
8. Smyser, C. D., Snyder, A. Z., Shimony, J. S., Mitra, A., Inder, T. E., & Neil, J. J. Resting-State Network Complexity and Magnitude Are Reduced in Prematurely Born Infants. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(1): 322–333.
9. Gozdas, E., Parikh, N. A., Merhar, S. L., Tkach, J. A., He, L., & Holland, S. K. Altered functional network connectivity in preterm infants: antecedents of cognitive and motor impairments? Brain Struct and Funct. 2018;223(8): 3665-3680.
10. Hoff, G. A. J., Van den Heuvel, M. P., Benders, M. J., Kersbergen, K. J., & De Vries, L. S. On development of functional brain connectivity in the young brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7: 650.
Figure 3. Relationships between FNC and PMA/GA in term-born infants. In each chord diagram, the orange and blue of the nodes represent high- and low-order networks respectively; the red and blue of connectivity represent positive and negative correlation respectively; the length of the node represents the number of the connectivity connected to it and the width of connectivity represents the connection strength. The sFNC correlated more with PMA than those with GA, whereas the variance of dFNC showed a contrast pattern.
Figure 4. Group differences in FNC between term and preterm-born infants. The red and blue in each matrix represent that preterm than term neonates have a higher and lower value. Compared with term-born infants, preterm-born infants showed decreased dFNC variance between almost all networks, decreased sFNC between low- and high-order networks, and increased sFNC between low-order networks.
Figure 1. Resting-state networks identified by group independent component analysis in term-born infants scanned at 43.5-44.5 weeks PMA. Example axial, coronal, and sagittal slices for meaningful spatial patterns in seven low- (left) and high-order (right) networks. RSN: resting-state network.
Figure 2. Changes in functional network connectivity with the PMA in term infants.
rAN/lAN: right/left Auditory Network, mMN/lMN: medial/lateral Motor Network, rVN/lVN: right/left Visual Network, SSN: Somatosensory Network; rVAN/lVAN: right/left Visual Association Network, lPN: lateral Parietal Network, FPN: Frontoparietal Network, pPN: posterior Parictal Network, TN: Temporal Network, MAN: medical Motor Association Network, PFN: Prefrontal Network.
Figure 5. Relationships between the variance of dFNC and PMA/GA in preterm-born infants. More significant results were found between dFNC and GA at birth, and there is no negative correlation between the variance of dFNC and age. Besides, the sFNC has no significant correlations with PMA/GA in preterm.