Jia Hui Wong1 and Ei Ei Nyein1
1Neuroradiology, National Neuroscience Institute Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Synopsis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been a widely used modality in patients with Deep Brain Stimulator (DBS) for a variety of
neurological diseases. Radiofrequency heating still presents as a major concern in patient’s safety and exists as the most common limiting
factor. This poster would help individuals to gain a deeper understanding about the importance of SAR considerations in patients with DBS
whilst undergoing MRI without compromising patients safety and scan quality.
Background
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has evolved into a fundamental tool used in patients with Deep Brain Stimulator (DBS) systems for electrode
localization and to evaluate a wide range of disease processes. DBS systems have been approved as a surgical treatment in patients with conditions
such as essential tremor, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Dystonia, Obsessive-compulsive disorder and Epilepsy [1]. Despite the advancements allowing
most devices to become MRI compatible, safety concerns are still present with Radiofrequency (RF) heating being the most common limiting factor
mentioned in literature to date. RF heating occurs in DBS patients, especially along conductive components built in the system. This is extremely
detrimental as RF heating can cause a permanent neurological disorder. Hence safety considerations are to be implemented. Typical conditions that
are considered clinically include the values of maximum specific absorption rate (SAR), gradient strengths as well as the type of RF coil used. Considerations
SAR is defined as the absorbed RF energy per unit of mass of an object, and is measured in watts per kilogram (W/kg)[2]. Generally, MRI scanners
that are used in clinical settings derive an estimated SAR level for every scan; the factors that show in Table-1 are technical considerations according
to the device manufacturer’s guidelines [3]. All these technical specifications and patient’s weight are taken into account before a scan; an estimated
value of SAR is reflected on the scanning console. It is also known that SAR is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the electric field
resulting in a higher concentration in the near-field region of the electrode. MRI induced electrode heating depends on a number of factors. This
includes the placement of electrodes and extender wires, in which the total lead length and the nature of tissue would determine the overall heating
concentration. In addition, depending on how iso-centre the IPG (Implantable Pulse Generator) is in the MR imaging unit and the type of coil used.
These factors together with the chosen MR stimulation parameters would then dictate the energy deposition during imaging or SAR value [4][5].
According to the manufacturer's safety guidelines, routine clinical imaging can be performed at the lowest possible SAR/B1+rms. Conclusion
MRI as a modality contains exceeding diagnostic abilities in soft tissue differentiation and its immense anatomical detailing. It has grown to become a
proposed prime modality used in patients with DBS. However, RF heating still exists as a major concern in patient’s safety to date. Hence, the above
SAR considerations and technical considerations mentioned should be adhered throughout MRI scan without compromising on patient’s safety while
acquiring a scan of diagnostic quality. Nevertheless, more extensive research is needed to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of heating not
only just using SAR levels as a measure, where movement, induced current, and device functionality should also be studied. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. National Neuroscience Institute (2017). Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease. Available at: https://www.nni.com.sg/news/medical-news-
singhealth/parkinson-disease-deep-brain-stimulation (Accessed: 20 September 2021).
2. Baker, K.B., Tkach, J.A., Phillips, M.D. and Rezai, A.R., (2006). Variability in RF induced heating of a deep brain stimulation implant across MR systems. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official
Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 24(6), 1236-1242.
3. Medtronic. MRI guidelines for medtronic deep brain
stimulation systems. Minneapolis, MN: Medtronic; 2015. (Accessed: 20 September 2021).
4. Mohsin, S. (2011). Concentration of the Specific
Absorption Rate around Deep Brain Stimulation electrodes during MRI. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 121, 469-484.
5. Franceschi, A. M., Wiggins, G. C., Mogilner, A. Y., Shepherd, T., Chung, S., & Lui, Y. W. (2016). Optimized, Minimal Specific Absorption Rate MRI for High-Resolution Imaging in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 37(11), 1996–2000.