Andrew J Fagan1
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
Image artifacts are commonly encountered in musculoskeletal
MRI, and can lead to difficulties in correct image interpretation. While some artifacts are very obvious in an
image, and the challenge then becomes one of ‘reading around’ the artifact,
others can be more subtle and could be easily misinterpreted as a pathology. Understanding
the source of an artifact can help to minimize its prevalence during set-up/scanning,
or to differentiate artifact from genuine pathology when present in an
image. This interactive talk will present
a range of common (and some not-so-common) image artifacts, and discuss their
source and strategies to minimize their impact.
Image artifacts are commonly
encountered when performing MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Artifacts can be caused by a variety of
factors, for example:
- by the patient themselves - involuntary motion,
magnetic susceptibility-induced distortions of the magnetic field, the inherent
electrical properties of tissue
- from equipment malfunction - faulty RF coils or
scanner electronics, damaged magnet room Faraday cage, faulty MR Conditional electronic
devices (pumps, anesthesia workstations, physiological monitoring equipment)
located in the magnet room, magnet room environmental conditions (temperature, humidity)
-
from poor operator technique – patient preparation
and set-up within RF coil and/or scanner, imaging sequence choice and/or prescription,
RF coil choice
While some artifacts are very
obvious in an image, and the challenge then becomes one of ‘reading around’ the
artifact, others can be more subtle and could be easily misinterpreted as a
pathology. Understanding the source of
an artifact can help during scanning to minimize its prevalence in the
resulting image or possibly to remove it altogether. For artifacts already present in an image,
this understanding can also help to differentiate artifact from genuine
pathology, thereby minimizing the potential for a misdiagnosis.
This interactive talk will
present a range of common (and not-so-common) artifacts and solicit suggestions
from the audience as to their source and possible mitigation strategies.
Learning Outcomes
1. Identify
common image artifacts encountered in MSK MRI
2. Understand
the source of each artifact
3. Understand
strategies which can be used to remove or minimize the prevalence of the artifact
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge my colleagues Drs Frick and Amrami, and physics assistants Renee, Jenna, Ian and Pam for contributing some interesting artifact images.References
1. Singh
DR, Chin MS, Peh WC. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Semin
Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014 Feb;18(1):12-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365831. Epub
2014 Feb 10. PMID: 24515878.
2.
Roth E, Hoff M,
Richardson ML, Ha AS, Porrino J. Artifacts Affecting Musculoskeletal Magnetic
Resonance Imaging: Their Origins and Solutions. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016
Sep-Oct;45(5):340-6. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
PMID: 26948320.
3. Vanhoenacker
F, De Vos N, Van Dyck P. Common Mistakes and Pitfalls in Magnetic Resonance
Imaging of the Knee. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016;100(1):99. Published 2016
Nov 19. doi:10.5334/jbr-btr.1206
4.
Elizabeth M. Lee,
El-Sayed H. Ibrahim, Nancy Dudek, et al, Improving MR Image
Quality in Patients with Metallic Implants. RadioGraphics 2021 41:4, E126-E137
5.
Goh CK, Peh WC.
Pictorial essay: pitfalls in magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Can
Assoc Radiol J. 2012 Nov;63(4):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2011.02.005. Epub
2011 Nov 3. PMID: 22054700.