Cardiac MRI: The Physicist's View
Jürgen E Schneider1
1University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a clinically well-established medical imaging modality that can provide a comprehensive, multi-parametric assessment of the heart in patients. CMR, albeit technically challenging, can yield insights at different scales ranging from the whole heart down to cellular and molecular level in the heart muscle, thereby spanning several orders of magnitude in resolution. This presentation primarily focuses on strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities of CMR. Strengths and weaknesses will be discussed in technical considerations and routine applications, while opportunities will be exemplified in emerging CMR techniques.

Introduction:

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a clinically well-established medical imaging modality that provides a comprehensive, multi-parametric assessment of the heart in patients. CMR can yield insights at different scales ranging from the whole heart down to cellular and molecular level in the heart muscle (“myocardium”), thereby spanning several orders of magnitude in resolution. The aim of this talk is to provide an overview of both routine and emerging CMR imaging techniques to illustrate strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities of CMR.

Technical considerations:

CMR scans are typically reported in a coordinate system, which is defined by the geometry of the heart rather than the gradients or patient. Scout scans are therefore required at the beginning of each CMR examination to identify these relevant views, which are orientated along the short- and long-axes of the heart. To minimise the influence of motion (caused by the heart pumping blood through the body and by respiration) on the data acquisition process, fast imaging sequence are paramount. In addition, CMR sequences are routinely synchronized (i.e. triggered) to the electrocardiogram (ECG) and combined with patient breath-holding. CMR images have either bright or black blood contrast: the bright blood contrast is generated by the inflow effect of unsaturated spins from the blood pool into the imaging slice. Conversely, dark or black blood contrast can be achieved through the spin washout effect from the imaging slice in a spin-echo sequence, and / or by additional black blood magnetisation preparation schemes (such as double inversion preparation pulses).

Routine Applications:

This part discusses techniques that may be applied during a standard clinical CMR examination.
  • Cardiac function: Bright blood multi-frame imaging techniques using either spoiled gradient echo or balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) pulse sequences are applied at multiple timepoints throughout the cardiac cycle (“cine-MRI”) to quantify myocardial mass and volumes of the heart’s chambers (“ventricles”). Equipping the sequences with additional contrast modules such as for example a tagging module or motion-encoding gradients allows for detailed characterization of the deformation and the motion pattern as the heart muscle contracts and relaxes.
  • T1- and T2-mapping: While diagnostic information historically relied on relative differences in contrast due to differences in relaxation times between healthy and diseased myocardium, T1-/T2-weighted imaging techniques have nowadays largely been superseded by mapping techniques to provide quantitative values of relaxation times on a voxel-by-voxel basis reflective of intrinsic tissue properties.
  • Contrast-enhanced MRI: Although endogenous contrast mechanisms are a key strength of CMR, paramagnetic (i.e. Gd-based) contrast agents are typically administered to assess myocardial blood flow in the myocardium (“first-pass perfusion MRI”), diffuse and focal fibrosis, respectively. Specifically, native and post-contrast T1 maps can be combined to derive extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, while Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) is the reference standard for non-invasive imaging of myocardial scar (i.e. focal fibrosis).

Emerging Techniques:

This part discusses CMR techniques that have shown promises but are not yet applied routinely in the clinics.
  • Metabolic Imaging: While CMR primarly utilises the signal of the water protons to characterise anatomy or function of the heart, the detection and quantification of signals other than those from water may provide complimentary insights into the (patho-) physiological status of the myocardium. Metabolism can be interrogated either directly using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (single voxel MRS or spectroscopic MR imaging) or, for certain metabolites, indirectly by means of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (“CEST”) imaging. Both techniques hold significant potential for identifying novel biomarkers of cardiovascular disease.
  • Elastography: Myocardial stiffness, which has a major influence on cardiac function, is increased in many cardiac diseases. Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase‐contrast MRI technique which measures the time-varying cardiac shear modulus, reflective of cardiac stiffness, by application of low-frequency acoustic waves during the imaging process. Non-invasive imaging techniques to assess myocardial stiffness are lacking in the clinic, but cardiac MRE has the potential to close this gap.
  • Diffusion MRI: Cardiac microarchitecture, which is a key determinant of (patho-) physiologically relevant functions of the heart, can be assessed using diffusion MRI. Water molecules act as a sensitive marker of tissue integrity and cellular orientation. The data are commonly modelled using the Diffusion Tensor, which requires at least six measurements with non-collinear Diffusion weighting (DW) plus one measurement with no / low DW. Signal-to-noise constraints, scan-time requirements, motion of the beating heart, strain and perfusion are major confounder and make the application of this technique very challenging.
  • Multi-parametric “One-Stop-Shop” Sequences: While the benefits of quantitative parameter mapping are well established, their scan time requirements and sensitivity to physiological motion pose major constraints. Recently, two alternative approaches, namely MR Fingerprinting (1,2) and MR Multi-tasking (3) have been introduced to overcome these limitations: in both cases multiple parameter maps are obtained simultaneously during one acquisition.

Conclusion:

CMR is a powerful, albeit technically challenging imaging modality that allows for a detailed assessment of the heart. While major advances in hard- and software development over the past two decades resulted in widespread availability of CMR in the clinic, more research is required to improve robustness and to push the boundaries of this versatile technique.

Acknowledgements

JES acknowledges funding from the British Heart Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

References

  1. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 2013;495(7440):187-192.
  2. Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Chen Y, Ma D, Lo WC, Griswold M, Seiberlich N. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1 , T2 , and proton spin density. Magn Reson Med 2017;77(4):1446-1458.
  3. Christodoulou AG, Shaw JL, Nguyen C, Yang Q, Xie Y, Wang N, Li D. Magnetic resonance multitasking for motion-resolved quantitative cardiovascular imaging. Nat Biomed Eng 2018;2(4):215-226.
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2022)