Elizabeth M Johnson1
1Mayo Clinic, United States
Synopsis
Several strategies exist to accommodate for increased access to cardiac MR in a busy practice.
Our cardiovascular division worked closely with
technologists and physicists to design, build and incorporate disease specific CMR
protocols into our daily practice. I will discuss the design and benefits of
our focused CMR protocols, talk about the challenges in making these changes,
and the ongoing work we are doing to fully streamline our CMR practice.
Abstract
Traditionally, the expertise required to perform and
interpret cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has created barriers to its’ use,
with the majority of CMR concentrated at larger academic institutions. Some of
the main challenges to incorporating CMR into busy practices include long imaging
time with complex sequences, limited technologist training, and post-processing
requirements. There are several strategies to overcome these barriers and
expand access to CMR. In this presentation I will review the strategies our
cardiovascular imaging division has employed to improve and standardize
performance in our growing CMR practice.
There are several factors that contribute to the complexity
of performing CMR. There are numerous sequences available in CMR, some of which
require separate post-processing software for analysis and interpretation. There is a wide
range of pathology affecting the heart, so it is important for radiologists and
referring clinicians to understand when CMR is appropriate, and which sequences
to select for each exam. Patient related challenges in CMR include variable
anatomy and compensating for breathing and cardiac motion. MR technologists performing
CMR especially need to be familiar with patient related challenges and how to
optimize image quality without prolonging scan time. In addition, there are many additional steps in the patient preparation for CMR compared to other MR exams. Maximizing productivity of technologists performing CMR can have a significant impact on scan time and total table time.
Creating disease specific
protocols reduced scan time which it not only beneficial to
the patient and the technologist, but can have a dramatic effect on image
quality, especially when imaging patients who have difficulty with breath holds
or lying flat for extended periods of time. From an operations standpoint, decreasing
the imaging time allows for shorter scheduling slots, opening up the scanners for
additional exams.
Our cardiovascular division worked closely with
technologists and physicists to design, build and incorporate disease specific CMR
protocols into our daily practice. I will discuss the design and benefits of
our focused CMR protocols, talk about the challenges in making these changes,
and the ongoing work we are doing to fully streamline our CMR practice.Acknowledgements
Department of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida
Mayo Clinic Florida MRI department, with special thanks to Amy Lockwood, R.T.
References
Kramer, C.M., Barkhausen, J., Bucciarelli-Ducci, C. et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22, 17 (2020).
Leiner, T., Bogaert, J., Friedrich, M.G. et al. SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22, 76 (2020).