Hee Jung Shin1
1Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
As there are growing interests in risk-based
supplemental breast cancer screening and concerns about gadolinium deposition
in the brain, diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW MRI) has emerged as a promising
modality for identifying mammographically occult malignancy. Current evidence
suggests that DW MRI combined with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted sequences
provides a higher sensitivity than mammography or mammography combined with
ultrasound but lower sensitivity than DCE MRI.
Advances in DW
MRI acquisition, post-processing, and standardized interpretation have
significantly improved DW MRI performance in cancer detection. In this lecture,
the potential role of DW MRI as a screening modality will be provided.
body of the abstract
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW MRI)
is a rapid MRI technique that does not require administration of a contrast
agent and may have a role as an alternative to contrast-enhanced MRI for breast
cancer screening. DW MRI measures the mobility of water molecules within tissue.
On DW MRI, breast cancers typically exhibit restricted diffusion, attributed to
increased cellular density and reduced extracellular space, and appear
hyperintense to surrounding tissues with lower apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC) values. Based on this characteristic, DW MRI may offer a viable
non-contrast method to detect breast cancer without the costs and toxicity
associated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). This application of DW
MRI has not yet been widely explored but is particularly timely given growing
health concerns related to the long-term use of gadolinium contrast agents
utilized in conventional breast MRI for high-risk screening. Moreover,
increasing breast density legislation is raising awareness of the limitations
of mammography in women with dense breasts, emphasizing the need for additional
cost-effective supplemental screening options in this population.
Preliminary
studies suggest DW MRI may provide higher sensitivity than screening
mammography and ultrasound for detection of breast malignancies, without the
costs and toxicity of DCE-MRI. In the field of cancer detection, current
evidence suggests that DW MRI combined with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted
sequences provides a higher sensitivity than mammography or mammography
combined with ultrasound but lower sensitivity than DCE MRI. However, advances
in DW MRI acquisition, post-processing, and standardized interpretation may have
significantly improved DW MRI performance in breast cancer detection. Technical
innovations to optimize image quality warrant further investigation to increase
the sensitivity of DW MRI.
Steps to consider when implementing
an unenhanced MRI program include protocol selection and execution, scheduling,
and billing. Since there is no standardized protocol, one of the first steps to
introducing an unenhanced MRI program is determining and implementing a
protocol. An unenhanced breast MRI protocol included an anatomical T1-weighted
sequence and a DW sequence with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 s/mm. The
T2-weighted sequence was not acquired because the DW MRI b=0 images provide
nearly identical T2-weighted weighted image contrast. The unenhanced protocol
takes about 10 minutes compared to 35 minutes for a full standard protocol.
Adjusting the MRI scheduling templates to accommodate the 15-minute unenhanced
MRI exam is helpful and enables efficient throughput compared to the standard
40-minute MRI exam. With the shorter examination period, four unenhanced MRI
exams can be performed per hour. The development and success of an unenhanced
breast MRI program require collaboration and communication between the breast
radiologists and the staff and stakeholders from multiple sites. Quality
control for unenhanced MRI should include appropriate protocols for image
acquisition and image interpretation, as well as for the management of lesions
identified by unenhanced MRI. As the unenhanced MRI program is incorporated
into clinical practice, auditing routine screening outcomes quarterly is
critical for the program's continued success.
In
addition, DW MRI has a shorter scan time and does not require intravenous
contrast materials, which could increase the availability and
cost-effectiveness of breast MRI scans and enable a faster throughput. The
technique has potential to benefit high-risk women with contraindications to
gadolinium-based contrast agents, but indications may be expanded to women of
intermediate risk factors such as personal history of breast cancer or dense
breast tissue. The results of ongoing prospective clinical trials are expected
to provide the evidence necessary to implement DW MRI as a stand-alone modality
in a diverse patient population. Finally, larger prospective and multicenter
trials are needed to validate single study findings and assess the performance
of DW MRI for generalized breast cancer screening.Acknowledgements
I thank Woo Kyung Moon, Nita
Amornsiripanitch, and Savannah Partridge in preparing this lecture.References
1. Mann RM, Kuhl
CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of
Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008;18(7):1307-1318.
2. Amornsiripanitch
N, Bickelhaupt S, Shin HJ, Dang M, Rahbar H, Pinker K, Partridge SC.
Diffusion-weighted MRI for unenhanced breast cancer screening. Radiology
2019;293(3):504-520.
3. Baltzer P, Mann
RM, Iima M, Sigmund EE, Clauser P, Gilbert FJ, Martincich L, Partridge SC,
Patterson A, Pinker K, Thibault F, Camps-Herrero J, Le Bihan D, EUSOBI
international Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from
the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group. Eur
Radiol 2020;30(3):1436-1450.