MT: Principles & Methods
David Alsop1
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

Synopsis

Magnetization Transfer (MT) imaging enables the imaging of the molecular constituents of microstructure using conventional water proton imaging methods. The physical basis of MT imaging, methods for acquiring and quantifying MT, and newer developments to enhance MT specificity will be reviewed. Example applications for characterizing tissue microstructure will be presented.

Course Summary

Microstructure is composed of an array of molecules other than water that support tissue structure and function. These molecules contain an abundance of hydrogen nuclei that could be measured by proton MRI, but their restricted motion makes their T2’s far too short for direct detection with conventional imaging. Fortunately, much of this otherwise invisible proton pool can be detected indirectly because it exchanges with mobile water protons(1,2). This magnetization exchange occurs by spin diffusion along the molecule to sites exposed to water and then either chemical exchange (actual exchange of protons between water and the surface protons) or just magnetization transfer through spin-spin interactions(3,4). Magnetization exchange contributes to the apparent T2 and T1 relaxation of the mobile water pool, but can be further emphasized by selectively saturating the spins of these molecules with RF pulses. The exchange of magnetization transfers the saturation to the mobile water pool. Imaging of this saturation transfer from bound molecules is referred to as Magnetization Transfer (MT) imaging.

Selective saturation of the immobile molecular pool is achieved by exploiting its long T2. On-resonance pulses that rotate the free water magnetization by an integer multiple of 180° can be used(5,6). Such pulses preserve the magnitude of the mobile water but mostly saturate the immobile proton pool because its T2 is short compared to the RF pulse width. A more common approach is to apply RF pulses at relatively large frequency offsets relative to the water center frequency(1,2). Spins with long T2 have very broad lines that extend many kHz away from center frequency. Off-resonance pulses saturate the very broad, short T2 lines of immobile molecules while having a smaller effect on the narrow lines of mobile water. By acquiring images with different off-resonance frequencies, one can generate a z-spectrum of MT. Modeling of z-spectra can be used to characterize the T2 and lineshape of the immobile molecules(7). Unlike the Lorentzian lines from spins in mobile liquids, lines from spins with restricted mobility are Gaussian, and when averaged across orientation angles, they are super-Lorentzian(8,9).

A number of strategies to quantify MT effects from images have been used(7). The simplest is to calculate the MT ratio, or MTR, defined as 1-(MT image)/(Reference image) where the reference image is an image acquired with no MT power applied. The MTR depends on the power and frequency of the MT saturation pulses applied but also on other details of the pulse sequence such as the repetition time, TR, the tissue T1, and errors in RF amplitude caused by spatially nonuniform RF transmit fields and any miscalibration. A newer measure, MTsat, attempts to extract a measure of the effect of an individual MT pulse that is independent of T1 and sequence parameters and also less sensitive to RF errors(10). Still, this measure cannot be directly related to any microstructure properties or components.

Fitting a full physical model for MT, a quantification process known as qMT, can be used to measure a number of immobile proton parameters including their fractional density relative to water, the exchange rate to water, and their lineshape(7). A full model fit requires acquiring a large number of RF saturation frequencies and powers, but the number of images needed can be reduced when the range of expected parameters is limited and when measurement of a particular quantity is targeted. In particular, approximate quantification of the immobile proton density relative to water, sometimes referred to as the Macromolecular Proton Fraction (MPF) can be achieved with as little as one off-resonance saturation(11).

More sensitive probes of microstructure could be possible if the total immobile proton pool can be divided into different microstructural elements. One promising new approach(12) aims to separate these elements based on a property of immobile proton lines, their dipolar order relaxation time (T1d)(13). Dipolar order can be thought of as a distortion of the lineshape that occurs when RF is applied off-resonance. The line becomes more saturated on the side where the RF is applied while the opposite side is less saturated. This effect competes with T1d relaxation. If T1d is long, more distortion occurs and the saturation effect is reduced. This effect can be highlighted by subtracting an image acquired with power divided equally between positive and negative frequency offsets from a single frequency saturated image, an experiment known as inhomogeneous MT (ihMT) imaging(12). ihMT emphasizes longer T1d molecules. T1d’s appear longest in membrane lipids, so ihMT images emphasize membrane rich myelin. More refined ihMT experiments(14) can potentially measure other pools of molecules with intermediate T1d’s.

MT has been used in a number of ways in research and clinical studies. MT is used in neuromelanin imaging to attenuate myelin signal and enhance contrast(15). The strong MT and ihMT effects in myelin can be used to provide quantitative metrics correlated with myelin to serve as biomarkers of disease for research and clinical purposes(16). Quantitative Myelin measures can be paired with diffusion measurements to estimate the g-ratio(17), the ratio of the axon radius to the myelin sheath radius.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1989;10(1):135–44.

2. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Graham SJ. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 2001 Apr;14(2):57–64.

3. Edzes HT, Samulski ET. Cross relaxation and spin diffusion in the proton NMR of hydrated collagen. Nature. 1977 Feb;265(5594):521–3.

4. Liepinsh E, Otting G. Proton exchange rates from amino acid side chains— implications for image contrast. Magn Reson Med. 1996 Jan;35(1):30–42.

5. Gochberg DF, Gore JC. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging via selective inversion recovery with short repetition times. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):437–41.

6. Davies NP, Summers IR, Vennart W. Optimum setting of binomial pulses for magnetization transfer contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11(5):539–48.

7. Sled JG. Modelling and interpretation of magnetization transfer imaging in the brain. NeuroImage. 2018 Nov 15;182:128–35.

8. Wennerström H. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance lineshapes in lamellar liquid crystals. Chem Phys Lett. 1973 Jan 1;18(1):41–4.

9. Morrison C, Henkelman RM. A model for magnetization transfer in tissues. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33(4):475–82.

10. Helms G, Dathe H, Kallenberg K, Dechent P. High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Dec;60(6):1396–407.

11. Yarnykh VL. Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping from a single off-resonance magnetization transfer measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jul;68(1):166–78.

12. Varma G, Duhamel G, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Magnetization Transfer from Inhomogeneously Broadened Lines: A Potential Marker for Myelin. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):614–22.

13. Varma G, Girard OM, Prevost VH, Grant A, Duhamel GD, Alsop DC. Interpretation of magnetization transfer from inhomogeneously broadened lines (ihMT) in tissues as a dipolar order effect within motion restricted molecules. J Magn Reson. 2015 Nov;260:67–76.

14. Carvalho VND, Hertanu A, Grélard A, Mchinda S, Soustelle L, Loquet A, et al. MRI assessment of multiple dipolar relaxation time (T1D) components in biological tissues interpreted with a generalized inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) model. J Magn Reson 2020 Feb;311:106668.

15. Nakane T, Nihashi T, Kawai H, Naganawa S. Visualization of neuromelanin in the Substantia nigra and locus ceruleus at 1.5T using a 3D-gradient echo sequence with magnetization transfer contrast. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(4):205–10.

16. Kisel AA, Naumova AV, Yarnykh VL. Macromolecular Proton Fraction as a Myelin Biomarker: Principles, Validation, and Applications. Front Neurosci. 2022;16. 10.3389/fnins.2022.819912

17. Campbell JSW, Leppert IR, Narayanan S, Boudreau M, Duval T, Cohen-Adad J, et al. Promise and pitfalls of g-ratio estimation with MRI. NeuroImage. 2018 Nov 15;182:80–96.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2022)