Wonje Lee1, Kanghyun Ryu1, Fraser Robb2, John Pauly3, Shreyas Vasanawala1, and Greig Scott3
1Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2GE healthcare, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
Noncontact
vital sensing applications have great potential to aid in patient care. We
leverage a reconfigurable SDR to assess the feasibility of in-bore
cardiopulmonary sensing using CW doppler radar that operates independently of the
MRI system and data acquisition.
Introduction
This
study investigates the feasibility of noncontact CW doppler radar cardiopulmonary
sensing during MRI that operates independently of MRI signal acquisitions.
Respiratory bellows, ECG or PPG are widely used during MRI for cardiac and
respiratory motion correction, but often add setup time, or cause patient
discomfort and interference with other in-bore apparatus. The efficacy of such
devices in a harsh electromagnetic environment may be limited 1 or infeasible
for certain patient populations 2. In non-contact doppler radar, the
group delay caused by tiny physiological motions of breathing and heartbeat
creates detectable phase shifts in the reflected signal 3. In this
work, we leverage a reconfigurable SDR (bladeRF 2.0, Nuand) to detect in-vivo
cardiopulmonary signals within the MR bore during an MRI scan. The radar system
adopts the multichannel receiver architecture running at 2.4GHz using the bladeRF
and two in-house antennas. The sensed radar vital signs were validated with synchronized
system references. Method
Figures 1 & 2 show the schematic and photograph of the
radar system and its integration in a 3T wide bore system (MR750w, GE). Inside
the scan room, two antennas were attached to the bore ceiling symmetric with
iso-center, and adjacent to each other above the subject’s landmark position.
These antennas were remotely connected by RF coax cables to a bladeRF, located
in the console room. A healthy volunteer lay in the supine position at the
cardiac landmark, with a torso anterior array (Air-coil, GE). A passive RF tag was also attached on the
subject chest to enhance backscattered waves.
About 20cm of gap existed between the antenna and the
subject’s chest wall. A single slice FIESTA MRI sequence (11s) was prescribed,
and the system bellows and PPG pulse sensor were wired to the subject. These vital
signs sensors were recorded by the MRI gating control.
The
radar transmitted a 2.4GHz monotone with estimated power of 0.23µW to the antenna terminal. The received signal was
first demodulated with a 50kHz Rx offset from transmit LO, and then numerically
down-converted to baseband by a digital down converter (ddc) Matlab subscript. Radar
data was independently acquired for 30 seconds, which included 11s of sequence
run-time. The baseband signals were pre-conditioned to eliminate artifacts made
by MR system interference prior to the vital signs processing in figure 3 (b).
The preconditioned time series was processed by three different methods
(complex magnitude, maximum projection, and arctan) for the reconstruction
fidelity check of figure 4. To extract heartrate, the singular spectral
analysis (SSA) algorithm 4 was applied over the breath holding time
window after high pass
filtering at 0.8Hz. The processed time series was validated by the MR-synchronized
PPG/bellows signals (figure 5). Results
Figure 3 (a) shows the complex demodulated time series real
(blue) and imaginary (red) components over 30 seconds. The temporal resolution
after decimation was 15.7ms, which was fast enough to capture the cardiac
cycles. Each component of the complex data exhibited a residual frequency
offset with period of 1.49s, arising from local oscillator frequency
synthesizer roundoff. The complex magnitude of the time series before (blue)
and after (red) the artifact correction are shown in figure 3 (b). The signal
blips from MR system interference were successfully removed (red) for further
vital signs processing. Figure 4 provides the artifact-corrected time series by
the three reconstruction algorithms. In all cases, the breath hold intervals
(plateau) were well delineated and in good agreement. The relatively small
peaks within the plateau were also evident and with periodicity consistent with
the heart rate of the subject. Figure
5 (a) shows the complex magnitude of the radar signal time-aligned with the
system bellows, demonstrating clear delineation of the breath holding window in
both. The depicted SSAs denoised the original radar signal and were aligned
well with the PPG data over the window in figure 5 (b). Discussion
CW
radar is known to consume low power and to have non-stringent bandwidth
requirements. In addition, implementation is relatively simple compared to
pulsed radar 5. The SDR used in this study provided sufficient
signal fidelity even with sub µW transmit
power to reconstruct a vital-signs time series during MR cardiac scan
operation. The complex magnitude reconstruction yielded a clear cardiopulmonary
signature in the presence of residual phase noise of the radar system. Other reconstruction approaches may require
precise phase offset control. Furthermore, the capability of null point free
reconstruction with the quadrature receiver allows freedom in antenna-subject
separation, in support of diverse subject populations. The SSA reconstruction
was found to be helpful for heart rate extraction by reducing inherent noise
other than the target quasi-periodic signals 6. In system
integration, the radar signal encounters some interference by the MR scan
operation. During cardiac sequence acquisition, the interference appeared as
data blips, which could be addressed by the correction algorithm. Conclusion
In
this study, noncontact in-bore vital sign sensing was demonstrated with CW
doppler radar in a 3T MRI, and its feasibility was confirmed for in-vivo
application with the existing respiratory/pulse sensorsAcknowledgements
We thank GE Healthcare for research
support, and received funding from NIH
grants R01 EB019241, U01EB029427, R01EB012031, U01EB026412References
1. Nacif
MS, Zavodni A,
Kawel N,
Choi EY, Lima JA, Bluemke DA. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and its electrocardiographs
(ECG): tips and tricks. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(6):1465-1475.
doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9957-4
2. Zhang
T, Cheng JY, Chen Y, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS. Robust
self-navigated body MRI using dense coil arrays. Magn Reson
Med. 2016 Jul;76(1):197-205. doi:
10.1002/mrm.25858. Epub
2015 Jul 29. PMID: 26220204; PMCID: PMC4732937.
3. C.
Li, V. M. Lubecke,
O. Boric-Lubecke
and J. Lin, "A Review on Recent Advances in Doppler Radar Sensors for
Noncontact Healthcare Monitoring," in IEEE Transactions on Microwave
Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2046-2060, May 2013, doi:
10.1109/TMTT.2013.2256924.
4. Deng, Cheng, "Time Series
Decomposition Using Singular Spectrum Analysis" (2014). Electronic Theses
and Dissertations. Paper 2352. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2352
5. Olga
Boric-Lubecke;
Victor M. Lubecke;
Amy D. Droitcour;
Byung-Kwon Park; Aditya Singh, "Radar Principles," in Doppler
Radar Physiological Sensing , IEEE, 2016, pp.21-38, doi: 10.1002/9781119078418.ch2.
6. J. Zabalza,
J. Ren and S. Marshall, "Singular Spectrum Analysis for effective noise
removal and improved data classification in Hyperspectral Imaging," 2014
6th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote
Sensing (WHISPERS), 2014, pp. 1-4, doi:
10.1109/WHISPERS.2014.8077583.