Xiaowei Zhuang1,2, Zhengshi Yang1, Tim Curran3, Rajesh Nandy4, Mark Lowe5, and Dietmar Cordes1,3
1Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2Interdisciplinary neuroscience PhD program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 3University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, 4University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, United States, 5Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
To improve the accuracy of subject-level activation detections in noisy
fMRI data, models to optimize voxel-wise smoothness levels for both isotropic
Gaussian filter and spatially adaptive steerable filters are proposed. The smoothing
step with currently optimized FWHM is incorporated into the optimization
algorithm and solved efficiently using a sequential quadratic programming
solver. Results from both simulated data and real episodic memory data indicate
that a higher detection sensitivity for a fixed specificity can be achieved
with the proposed method as compared to the widely used univariate general
linear models with various levels of smoothness.
Introduction
Episodic memory loss is a hall mark symptom in Alzheimer’s
disease (AD). Task-based fMRI has the capability to detect abnormal brain
activations during episodic memory tasks at a prodromal stage before clinical dementia
onset 1,2. However, the signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) in fMRI data is usually low, especially in the targeted memory
activation regions, the medial temporal lobe (MTL). To improve the SNR,
isotropic Gaussian smoothing with a preselected full-width-half-maximum (FWHM)
has been widely adopted as an fMRI preprocessing step3. However, using a single FWHM
across the whole brain for Gaussian smoothing disregards the regional cortical differences,
and introduces smoothing artifacts to the fine-mapping regions such as MTL4. In this study, we propose a
method that optimizes voxel-wise FWHMs for isotropic Gaussian smoothing to
improve the specificity while maintaining the sensitivity in subject-level
activation detection during fine-mapping fMRI tasks. Directional steerable
filters, as spatially adaptive alternatives to an isotropic Gaussian filter, have
also been explored for their advantages in capturing directional activations5. Methods
Model. Table. 1 illustrates our proposed method. For
a given center voxel, let Y (takes the dimension [t, Wx, Wy, Wz]) be a matrix
representing fMRI time courses of voxels from its 3D local neighborhood; and G be the filter
with the current FWHM used to smooth this local neighborhood; window sizes [Wx, Wy, Wz] are determined
from the current FWHM (detailed in Table 1). The smoothed time series of the
center voxel can then be represented as Y'=YxG; and take
the dimension of [t,1] and
for an isotropic Gaussian filter and [t,7] for 7 steerable
filters. Let X=(x1,x2,...,xn) take the dimension [t, n] and represent n functions
used to model the BOLD response. A sequential quadratic programming solver6 was further adopted to
optimize the FWHM of each voxel through minimizing the error term in the
general linear model (GLM) for an isotropic-Gaussian-filter-smoothed time
series (Y' takes the dimension [t,1] and objFWHM=||YGiso - Xβ||2), and constrained canonical correlation
analysis model7 for steerable-filters-smoothed time series (Y' takes the dimension [t,7] and objFWHM=||YGstα- Xβ||2), as
detailed in Table 1. Imaging. fMRI data (TR/TE/resolution= 2s/30ms/1.7x1.7x5mm3,
25 slices, coronal oblique, 288-time frames) from 16 subjects each consisting
of a resting-state data set and an episodic memory task data set were analyzed.
The memory task involved viewing faces paired with occupations and contained
instruction, encoding, recognition and control periods. Simulated data:
500 5x5 neighborhoods with active center voxels and 500 neighborhoods with
inactive center voxels for 16 subjects, simulated in Zhuang et al8, are reused here. Briefly, the
distribution of active neighbors in each local neighborhood followed the
empirical distribution of real fMRI data analyzed with the univariate method.
Time-series for simulated neighborhoods were obtained from neighborhoods in
real data with the same activation patterns (both resting-state and task fMRI).
Wavelet-resampled resting-state time-series were added to the task time-series
with different noise fractions to simulate time courses at different noise
levels. Analysis. GLM with various isotropic Gaussian smoothing levels
(FWHM=0mm,2mm,4mm,6mm,8mm) and the proposed methods were applied to both
simulated and real fMRI data, respectively. Voxel-wise activation map for contrast
encoding v/s control was computed to detect brain activation in each method. The
conventional receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method and the recovered
ROC9 method were used to evaluate
the performance of each method in simulated data (with known ground truth) and
real fMRI data, respectively. Results
Fig.1 plots the area under the ROC curves (AUC) for
simulated data with noise fractions from 0.45 to 0.95, integrated over false
positive rate (FPR) from 0 to 0.1 and averaged over 16 subjects. As shown in
Fig. 1, in terms of AUC in the low FPR range, optimizing FWHM for isotropic
Gaussian filter significantly improves the model performance in activation
detection over GLMs with time series smoothed using a single FWHM. Optimizing
FWHM for steerable filters further boosts the AUC for another 10.79%±5.37% on
average. Fig. 2(A) plots the recovered ROC curves for activation maps for contrast “Encoding vs. Control” from a representative subject obtained using GLM
on time series smoothed with various single FWHMs and with optimized FWHM
voxel-wisely. At a given FPR, optimizing FWHM for isotropic Gaussian filter
(light blue curve in Fig. 2) significantly increases the true positive rate
(TPR) over other methods. Furthermore, activation maps for this contrast
thresholded at FWE p≤0.05 are shown in Fig. 3. As indicated by green circles in
Fig. 3, optimizing FWHM for both isotropic Gaussian filter and steerable filters
enable the detection of activation in the bilateral hippocampus without
producing significant smoothing artifacts. Discussion and conclusion
Our proposed methods are targeted at finding the most appropriate FWHM
for the smoothing filters at every voxel. By incorporating the smoothing step into
the optimization problem, the proposed methods were able to more accurately detect
both simulated activations and medial temporal lobe activations during a real
fMRI episodic memory task. Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant
1RF1AG071566, P20GM109025 and P20AG068053), a private grant from the Peter and Angela Dal Pezzo funds, a private
grant from Lynn and William Weidner, a private grant from Stacie and Chuck
Matthewson, and the young scientist award at Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center
for Brain Health (Keep Memory Alive Foundation). References
1. Gallagher M, Koh MT. Episodic memory on
the path to Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol [online serial]. Elsevier
Ltd; 2011;21:929–934. Accessed at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.021.
2. Jin
M, Pelak VS, Curran T, Nandy RR, Cordes D. A preliminary study of functional
abnormalities in aMCI subjects during different episodic memory tasks. Magn
Reson Imaging [online serial]. Elsevier Inc.; 2012;30:459–470. Accessed at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.014.
3. Chen
JE, Glover GH. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods. Neuropsychol Rev.
2016;25:289–313.
4. Cordes
D, Jin M, Curran T, Nandy R. The smoothing artifact of spatially constrained
canonical correlation analysis in functional MRI. Int J Biomed Imaging. United
States; 2012;2012:1–11.
5. Friman
O, Borga M, Lundberg P, Knutsson H. Adaptive analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage.
United States; 2003;19:837–845.
6. Fletcher
R. Practical methods of optimization. John Wiley \& Sons; 2013.
7. Zhuang
X, Yang Z, Curran T, Byrd R, Nandy R, Cordes D. A family of locally constrained
CCA models for detecting activation patterns in fMRI. Neuroimage [online
serial]. United States: Elsevier; 2017;149:63–84. Accessed at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.081.
8. Zhuang
X, Yang Z, Sreenivasan KR, et al. Multivariate group-level analysis for task
fMRI data with canonical correlation analysis. Neuroimage. United States:
Elsevier Ltd; 2019;194:25–41.
9. Nandy
RR, Cordes D. Novel ROC-type method for testing the efficiency of multivariate
statistical methods in fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:1152–1162.