Afis Ajala1, Seung-Kyun Lee1, Daehun Kang2, Luca Marinelli1, Desmond Teck Beng Yeo1, and Thomas Foo1
1Magnetic Resonance Imaging, GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
The maximum gradient amplitude (Gmax)
and slew rate (SRmax) determine the minimum number of interleaves (and
total scan time) in a 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling (3DpCASL)
acquisition with a stack-of-spirals readout module for a given spatial
resolution. The higher Gmax and SRmax of a recently
developed head-only gradient system (MAGNUS) was utilized to reduce the total
scan time of a clinical 3DpCASL acquisition by a factor of 2 compared to a similar
acquisition carried out at a lower Gmax and SRmax of a
conventional whole-body system (CWBS) while maintaining comparable image
quality.
Introduction
Fast spin-echo 3D stack-of-spirals is
often used for the readout of a 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling (3DpCASL)
pulse sequence. The total scan duration of 3DpCASL acquisition is largely
dependent on the
number of interleaves (NI) used for the acquisition. The achievable maximum
gradient amplitude (Gmax) and slew rate (SRmax) of the
gradient can limit the minimum NI used for the 3DpCASL
acquisition and therefore the overall scan time for a given spatial resolution.
This is because of the need to reduce the spiral duration per shot ($$$\rm{\tau}$$$) that is necessary to minimize
the accrual of erroneous phases due to susceptibility, static B0
inhomogeneity and eddy currents. A recently developed head gradient coil
(MAGNUS - GE Global Research, Niskayuna,
NY, USA) simultaneously achieves 200 mT/m and 500 T/m/s on each axis using a
standard 1 MVA gradient driver in a clinical whole‐body 3.0 T system[1]. The MAGNUS has a higher peripheral nerve
stimulation (PNS) threshold compared to conventional clinical whole-body 3.0 T system (CWBS)[2] with typical Gmax and SRmax of 33-40 mT/m and 120
T/m/s respectively. In this work, we
demonstrate that the spiral
acquisition can be made more efficient on the MAGNUS to decrease the total scan time of a
3DpCASL acquisition without compromising the image quality compared
to a CWBS acquisition. Perfusion signal-to-noise ratio (pSNR)
efficiency and noise power per pixel ratio (NPPR) were used to compare the image quality of the CWBS and
MAGNUS acquisitions.Methods
All experiments were carried out on the MAGNUS gradient system with patches for zeroth and first order eddy
current and concomitant gradient fields correction[3]. The Gmax, SRmax,
and receiver bandwidth (rBW) of the readout spiral acquisitions on MAGNUS and CWBS satisfied
the azimuthal Nyquist criterion that prevents undersampling for
the 3DpCASL spiral k-space[4]. At an rBW of 500 kHz, and spatial resolution of 3.5 x 3.5 x 4 mm3, the spiral readout of the 3DpCASL
acquisition on the MAGNUS configuration was limited to Gmax of 49 mT/m
(far below the system Gmax of 200 mT/m), and slew rate of 450 T/m/s.
This was in contrast to CWBS configuration which was limited to Gmax
of 24 mT/m and utilized a slew rate of 110 T/m/s at an rBW of 250
kHz. The lower slew rate was chosen to mimic the lower PNS threshold for simultaneous x and y gradient waveforms on a CWBS. Acquired raw k-space phantom and
volunteer 3DpCASL data were processed for image reconstruction using
theoretically calculated spiral trajectories (nominal trajectories).
Separately, a dynamic field camera composed of 16 1H probes (Skope,
Zurich, Switzerland) was used to measure the true zeroth and first-order
transverse k-space trajectories (measured trajectories) for 3DpCASL
reconstruction as previously described[4]. Image reconstruction was carried
out in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) using the Orchestra software development
kit (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA). Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was calculated using
the perfusion-weighted (PW) and proton-density (PD) images as previously described in the ASL consensus[5]. pSNR efficiency was calculated as[4]: $$\mathrm{pSNR\ Efficiency = \frac{PW}{Noise\times\sqrt{NI\times \tau}}}$$ Wilcoxon
signed-rank test for matched pairs was used to assess CBF and pSNR efficiency differences between the CWBS and MAGNUS acquisitions.
Phantom and Volunteer Experiments:
Phantom images were acquired using the American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI
quality control phantom. To verify the trajectory correction, 3DpCASL images of
the ACR phantom were acquired using the CWBS and MAGNUS sequence parameters
(Table 1). Five healthy volunteers (mean age: 37 years, 2 females) were imaged under
an IRB approved protocol after a written informed consent was received. A
two-minute wait time was observed between the CWBS and MAGNUS 3DpCASL scans
for data consistency. Regional CBF and pSNR efficiency were quantified using semi-automatically drawn regions of interests (ROIs) in the lateral, anterior, and posterior cerebral regions of the brain.Results and Discussions
The total
scan time of the MAGNUS acquisitions were 48.3% lower than those of the CWBS
(Table 1). Implementing k-space undersampling strategies can further reduce the 3DpCASL scan time, thereby facilitating dynamic 3DpCASL studies. The calculated NPPR was 0.96, indicating similar noise power per pixel on the CWBS and MAGNUS acquisitions. Reconstructed PD images using the nominal and measured spiral
trajectories for the CWBS and MAGNUS acquisitions show comparable image quality (Figure 1). The measured trajectories only corrected for image rotations that become evident at higher SRmax[4]. Such image rotations can also be corrected by co-registration of the 3DpCASL acquisition with an anatomical image acquired in the same volume. Representative volunteer PD, PW and CBF images for the CWBS and
MAGNUS acquisitions are shown in Figure 2. The calculated regional CBF values
for the CWBS and MAGNUS acquisitions (Figure 3) were in the normal range for a
healthy volunteer (40–78 mL/100g/min)[6]. The pSNR efficiency was
consistently higher for all brain regions on the MAGNUS acquisition compared to
the CWBS acquisition with a mean increase of 28.7% across all ROIs and subjects
(Figure 4), which can be largely attributed to the reduced NI on the MAGNUS acquisitions.Conclusions
The higher performance of the MAGNUS gradient
system can be utilized to halve the scan time (compared to a CWBS acquisition) of
a clinical 3DpCASL acquisition while preserving the image quality of the scan.Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the expert knowledge of Dr. Marc Lebel in helping us understand the implementation of the 3D Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labelling pulse sequence.References
[1] T.
K. F. Foo et al., “Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert
gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate
at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 2356–2369, 2020, doi: 10.1002/mrm.28087.
[2] E. T. Tan et al., “Peripheral
nerve stimulation limits of a high amplitude and slew rate magnetic field
gradient coil for neuroimaging,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 83, no. 1, pp.
352–366, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/mrm.27909.
[3] S.
Tao et al., “The Effect of Concomitant Fields in Fast Spin Echo
Acquisition on Asymmetric MRI Gradient Systems,” Magn Reson Med, vol.
79, no. 3, pp. 1354–1364, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26789.
[4] D. Kang et al., “The effect of
spiral trajectory correction on pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling with
high-performance gradients on a compact 3T scanner,” Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 192–205, 2020, doi: 10.1002/mrm.28110.
[5] D. C. Alsop et al., “Recommended
implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical
applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European
consortium for ASL in dementia,” Magn Reson Med, vol. 73, no. 1, pp.
102–116, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1002/mrm.25197.
[6] G. W. J. Harston et al.,
“Quantification of Serial Cerebral Blood Flow in Acute Stroke Using Arterial
Spin Labeling,” Stroke, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 123–130, Jan. 2017, doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014707.