Xiaoxu Na1, Rajikha Raja1, Aline Andres2,3, and Xiawei Ou1,3,4
1Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States, 2Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States, 3Arkansas Children’s Nutrition Center, Little Rock, AR, United States, 4Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, AR, United States
Synopsis
This study examined relationships between mother’s physical activity
during pregnancy and newborn’s brain cortical development. Healthy pregnant
women were recruited and their physical activity level were monitored
throughout pregnancy. Their newborns underwent a brain MRI examination at 2
weeks of postnatal age. Brain structural images were post-processed and mean
cortical thickness for different brain regions was calculated. We found that at
both 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy, there were significant
positive correlations between mother’s physical activity level and newborn’s brain
cortical thickness in multiple regions, suggesting positive impact of mother’s physical
activity during pregnancy on offspring brain cortical development.
INTRODUCTION
Physical activity is an essential element of a
healthy lifestyle, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists encourages
pregnant women without obstetric/medical complications/contraindications to
continue or to initiate safe physical activities. In this study, we aimed to investigate
whether there is a relationship between mother’s physical activity at different
time points during pregnancy and newborn’s brain cortical development. METHODS
Healthy pregnant women without medical complications were recruited. Inclusion
criteria: second parity, singleton pregnancy; ≥21 years of age; conceived
without assisted fertility treatments. Exclusion criteria: pre-existing medical
conditions such as diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder, and serious psychiatric
disorders; drug or alcohol abuse; sexually transmitted diseases; medical
complications developed during pregnancy such as gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia.
In addition, neonates born pre-term (<37 weeks of gestation) or with medical
conditions or medications known to influence growth and development, or those
unable to complete a brain MRI examination during natural sleep were also
excluded. All
women had their physical activity measured at <10 weeks, ~12 weeks, ~18
weeks, ~24 weeks, ~30 weeks, and ~36 weeks of pregnancy, respectively, by
wearing an accelerometer (Actical, Philips Respironics, Bend, OR) at the ankle
for 3-7 days at each time point. Physical activity parameters including daily
step amounts, total activity counts, and average daily time spent in sedentary
or light/moderate/vigorous activity modes were calculated. At ~2 weeks of
postnatal age, the newborns underwent an MRI examination of the brain on a
Philips Acheiva 1.5T scanner during natural sleep without sedation. A neonatal
brain MRI protocol was used which included a 3D-T1 scan covering the whole
brain with a resolution of 1mm x 1mm x 1mm. In total, 44 pregnant women and
their newborns (23 boys and 21 girls) completed the study. The
T1-weighted images were post-processed by the Infant Brain Extraction and
Analysis Toolbox software (iBEAT V2.0, developed by the Developing Brain
Computing lab and Baby Brain Mapping lab at the University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Specifically, steps including inhomogeneity
correction, skull stripping, tissue segmentation to gray matter, white matter
and cerebrospinal fluid, left/right hemisphere separation, topology correction,
cortical surfaces (inner and outer) reconstruction and cortical parcellation
were performed. The UNC neonatal cortical surface atlas was used for parcellation
the brain MRI into 34 regions per hemisphere, and the mean cortical thickness
(defined as the closest distance from the white surface to the pial surface at
each surface’s vertex) of each cortical region was calculated. Spearman’s rank
partial correlation tests were used to evaluate potential relationships between
mother’s physical activity level at different time points during pregnancy and
neonatal brain cortical thickness in all brain regions. Sex and brain cortical
volume were included as covariates to account for sex differences and
variations in individual brain size that may be associated with factors such as
birth weight/length, head circumference, gestational age at birth and postnatal
age at MRI. False discovery rate (FDR) correction was used for
multiple-comparison correction associated with the 68 brain cortical regions
(left and right hemisphere combined), and correlations with FDR-corrected P
values ≤.05 were regarded as significant. All statistics analyses were done in
Matlab software (Version R2018b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA).RESULTS
Significant
correlations (FDR-corrected P ≤ 0.05) between mother’s physical activity at
<10 weeks of pregnancy and newborn’s cortical thickness in 4 brain regions
were identified (Figure 1). Specifically, mother’s average daily total activity
count positively correlated with newborn’s cortical thickness in the left
caudal middle frontal gyrus (R = 0.48, P = 0.04), right medial orbital frontal
gyrus (R = 0.48, P = 0.04), and right transverse temporal gyrus (R = 0.48, P =
0.04); mother’s average daily time spent in moderate activity mode positively
correlated with newborn’s cortical thickness in the right transverse temporal
gyrus (R = 0.53, P = 0.03). Furthermore, significant correlations between
mother’s physical activity at ~24 weeks of pregnancy and newborn’s cortical
thickness in 2 brain regions were identified (Figure 2). Specifically, mother’s
average daily total activity count positively correlated with newborn’s
cortical thickness in the left isthmus cingulate gyrus (R = 0.56, P = 0.02) and
right isthmus cingulate gyrus (R = 0.50, P = 0.05).CONCLUSIONS
Our results show that higher maternal physical activity level
during uncomplicated pregnancy is associated with greater neonatal brain
cortical thickness, and indicate that physical activity during pregnancy may be
beneficial for offspring brain development.Acknowledgements
This project
was supported by NIH 1R01HD099099 and USDA-ARS 6026-51000-012-06S.References
No reference found.