Zifei Liang1, Tanzil Mahmud Arefin1, Choong Heon Lee1, and Jiangyang Zhang1
1NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Although dMRI tractograophy has been
successfully used to examine brain connectivity, its limitation, mainly in
specificity, has also been reported. In this study, we generated a comprehensive
mouse brain streamline database based on 2700+ viral tracer data from Allen
Institute. The database was used as a ground truth to train a deep learning
network to estimate fiber orientations from diffusion MRI data of the mouse
brain. Compared to conventional methods, the deep learning network provided
more accurate estimation of fiber orientation leading to improved tractography.
Introduction
Diffusion MRI
(dMRI) tractography can non-invasively assess macroscopic structural
connectivity in the brain. Sophisticated tools (e.g. MRtrix, DSIStudio) have
been developed to estimate tissue fiber orientation distribution (FOD) and
reconstruct major white matter tracts. Although dMRI tractograophy has been
successfully used to examine brain connectivity, its limitation, mainly in
specificity1,
has also been noted, and is more severe in gray matter, where complex tissue
microstructural organization may interfere with estimation of FOD and
tractograophy2,3.
The objective of this study is to use deep learning (DL) to improve the estimation
of fiber orientations from dMRI data. Based on Allen Institute’s viral tracer
data, we generated a whole-brain streamline dataset representing mouse brain
connectivity and used it as a ground truth to train a DL network. Our results
demonstrate that our tool can improve the performance of dMRI tractography.Materials & Methods:
Allen tracer streamline
dataset: Tracer streamlines from 2764 independent experiments
were downloaded from the Allen Connectivity atlas and combined to build a
whole-brain tracer streamline dataset (Fig. 1) in the Allen atlas space4. Tract
orientation densities (TODs)5 were calculated from the streamline
dataset, with their amplitudes normalized (Fig. 1F).
dMRI experiments,
FOD, and co-registration: 3D ex vivo dMRI data were
acquired from C57BL/6 mice (n=10, 8 wks) with a 0.1 mm isotropic resolution and
60 diffusion encoding directions6, and FODs were estimated using
MRtrix. Using mappings between each subject data and the Allen atlas space6,
the tracer streamline TODs were mapped to individual subject space with necessary
orientation adjustments.
DL setup: A deep neural network similar to the previous
DWI-FOD network7 was trained using ex vivo mouse brain dMRI data as input and co-registered tracer
streamline TODs as target (Fig. 2). The network (MRH-sh) consisted of
convolutional and full connected concatenated layers. We used small 3x3x3 image patches from the
forebrain region (n=6) for training (total one million voxels, 10% of which used
as validation), and the rest subjects (n=4) for testing. Results:
The network predicted TODs (DL-TODs) (Fig.
3) showed better agreement with the tracer streamline TODs
than FODs estimated using spherical deconvolution (implemented in
MRtrix), as measured by differences in orientation between the largest lobes of
TOD/FODs (Fig. 4A). This was more apparent in gray matter structures (e.g. 53.2°±21° for FOD v.s. 35.2°±23° for DL-TOD, P<0.0001, Fig. 4B). In comparison, the improvements in white matters (12.9°±14° for FOD v.s. 8.5°±8° for DL-TOD, P<0.0001) were relatively minor. Fig. 4C compares tracer streamlines with
DL-TOD and FOD in the hippocampus. The tracer results revealed many streamlines
running in the horizontal orientation (yellow arrow), which is in agreement
with our understanding of hippocampal pathways. This organization was
recapitulated in the DL-TOD map but not in the FOD map, which predominantly
showed vertical (dorsal-to-ventral) orientations, which reflect the dendritic
network in the hippocampus.
Fig. 5 compares tracer result from a single
injection experiment with tractography results started from a comparable seed
region based on DL-TOD and FOD maps (n=5). Visual comparisons in 3D (Fig. 5A) and
horizontal sections (Fig. 5B) showed a better agreement between tracer and
DL-TOD results than the FOD result. This was confirmed by higher DICE score
(higher score for better spatial overlap) for the DL-TOD result than FOD.
Similar comparisons were performed for other tracer experiments (Fig. 5C) and
all showed that DL-TOD improved tractography in term of DICE score with respect
to tracer ground truth.Discussions & Conclusion:
Our results
demonstrate that DL networks, trained with histological ground truth, can enhance the accuracy in estimating
axonal fiber orientation and, thereby, improve tractography results in the
mouse brain. Several groups have compared dMRI results with histology8,9,10
and found good agreement in white
matter structures. In gray matter, the complex microstructural organization
(e.g. dendritic network and other cellular compartments) poses a major challenge
for dMRI to reveal axonal tracts. In this aspect, our results suggested that
improvements in gray matter tractography is possible, as shown in Figs. 4-5.
Although DL networks are often
presented as a black-box, without detailed knowledge of its inner-working, we compared
the estimated fiber orientation with results from conventional approaches. The
result in Fig. 4C suggests that the DL network can potentially distinguish dMRI
signals from the axonal compartments from others (e.g. dendrites). This
provides a clue for further optimization of dMRI acquisition to improve the
accuracy of tractography.
The tracer streamline dataset
is an important resource for development and validation of future tractography
methods. Even though tracer and dMRI data were not from the same subject, the
inter-subject differences are expected to be small among C57BL mouse brains.
dMRI data acquired from mouse brains using other acquisition schemes than used
in this study can be easily registered and compared to the tracer streamline
data.
Our study has several limitations.
First, the streamlines generated from viral tracer experiments may not capture
or represent all mouse brain axonal connections uniformly. As a result, the
number of streamlines may not correlate with actual number of axons. Second,
the network was trained using mouse brain data and can not be directly translated
to human data, although examining its inner-working (e.g. Fig. 4C) can bring
insights into improving axonal orientation estimation. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Cibu
T., et al. Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI
tractography is inherently limited, PNAS. 2014 Nov: 18(111): no.46.
2.
Dan
W. and Jiangyang Z. In vivo Mapping of Macroscopic Neuronal Projections in the
Mouse Hippocampus using High-resolution Diffusion MRI,
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15; 125: 84–93.
3.
Maged
G., et al. Multimodal image registration and connectivity analysis for
integration of connectomic data from microscopy to MRI, Nat Commun. 2019, 10:
no.5504.
4.
Allen
Mouse Brain Atlas Version 2 (2011) Technical White Paper, https://mouse.brain-map.org/static/atlas.
5.
Dhollander,
T. Track orientation density imaging (TODI) and track orientation distribution
(TOD) based tractography, Neuroimage, 2014, 94: 312-336.
6.
White
J.D. et al. Early life stress causes sex-specific changes in adult
fronto-limbic connectivity that differentially drive learning. Elife. 2020 Dec
1;9:e58301.
7.
Lin,
Z. et al. Fast learning of fiber orientation distribution function for MR
tractography using convolutional neural network, Med Phys. 2019 Jul; 46(7):
3101-3116.
8.
Schilling K.G. et al. Histological validation
of diffusion MRI fiber orientation distributions and dispersion. Neuroimage.
2018 Jan 15;165:200-221.
9.
Mollink J. et al. Evaluating fibre
orientation dispersion in white matter: Comparison of diffusion MRI, histology
and polarized light imaging. Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:561-574.
10.
Lin
C.P., Validation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance axonal fiber imaging
with registered manganese-enhanced optic tracts. Neuroimage. 2001
Nov;14(5):1035-47.
10. Lin
C.P., Validation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance axonal fiber imaging
with registered manganese-enhanced optic tracts. Neuroimage. 2001
Nov;14(5):1035-47.