Sisi Li1, Diwei Shi2, Li Chen2, Quanshui Zheng2, Hua Guo1, and Junzhong Xu3,4,5,6
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2Center for Nano and Micro Mechanics, Department of Mechanics Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 3Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Quantitative microstructural imaging based on diffusion MRI provides a non-invasive means to measure microstructural parameters, e.g., cell size. However, due to the remarkable complexity of incorporating transcytolemmal water exchange into diffusion biophysical models, water exchange is usually ignored. This leads to biased estimation of microstructural parameters, particularly intracellular volume fraction. Here, we propose a new approach to incorporate water exchange naturally in diffusion biophysical models with arbitrary gradient waveforms, making it possible to fit cell size, density, and intracellular water lifetime simultaneously. This establishes a general framework to incorporate transcytolemmal water exchange in any diffusion MRI-based microstructural imaging models.
Introduction
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) provides a non-invasive approach to probe the microstructure in biological tissues. Quantitative information can be further obtained by establishing and fitting biophysical models. Usually, dMRI signal can be expressed as the sum of the signals arising from two compartments1, i.e., intra- and extra-tissue spaces:
$$S=v_{i n} S_{i n}+v_{e x} S_{e x}=v_{i n} S_{i n}+\left(1-v_{i n}\right) S_{e x}\tag{1}$$
Although Eq. (1) has shown clinical relevance1, it remains problematic to ignore the transcytolemmal water exchange. The parameters about water exchange have been shown as important indicators of tumor status2. Moreover, the ignorance of water exchange has been found to lead to significant underestimation of intracellular volume fraction vin, making it impossible to estimate cell density non-invasively3.
Karger’s model is usually used to tackle water exchange, but it relies on approximations such as sufficiently long diffusion time and low water exchange4. Similarly, Stanisz’s approach needs to implement the short pulse approximation to incorporate water exchange5. These approximations are sometimes not valid in clinical acquisitions. To complicate matters, there is increasing interest in modifying diffusion gradient waveforms to include long diffusion gradient pulses for different applications. All these make it very challenging to incorporate water exchange in diffusion biophysical models.
In this work, we propose a general framework to tackle this challenge. First, we discretize any arbitrary-shaped gradient waveforms into a series of short pulses based on multiple propagators6. Second, we incorporate Stanisz’s quantitative model5 for each short pulse to handle both restricted diffusion and water exchange. Validations on numerical simulations show this new general framework not only enhances the fitting accuracy of microstructural parameters, but also provides additional information related to water exchange.
Theory
The dMRI signals from intra- and extra-cellular
spaces are:
$$\begin{gathered}S_{i n}=\exp (-\varphi(t)), \varphi(t)=\frac{\gamma^{2}}{2} \sum_{k} B_{k} \int_{0}^{t} d t_{1} \int_{0}^{t} d t_{2} \exp \left(-a_{k} D_{i n}\left|t_{1}-t_{2}\right|\right) g\left(t_{1}\right) g\left(t_{2}\right) \\S_{e x}=\exp (-\phi(\mathrm{t})), \phi(t)=\gamma^{2} D_{e x} \int_{0}^{t}\left(\int_{0}^{t_{1}} g\left(t_{2}\right) d t_{2}\right)^{2} d t_{1}\end{gathered}\tag{2}$$
where Bk and ak are geometric parameters in restricted diffusion. Based on multiple propagators6, any arbitrary gradient waveform g(t) can be discretized into a series of short pulses, as shown in Fig. 1.
Because each discretized pulse is short enough, the water exchange can be included in the diffusion biophysical model as5:
$$\begin{aligned}\frac{d S_{i n}}{d t} &=-\frac{\varphi\left(t_{i+1}\right)-\varphi\left(t_{i}\right)}{\tau} S_{i n}-K_{i n} S_{i n}+\frac{v_{e x}}{v_{i n}} K_{e x} S_{e x} \\\frac{d S_{e x}}{d t} &=-\frac{\phi\left(t_{i+1}\right)-\phi\left(t_{i}\right)}{\tau} S_{e x}-K_{e x} S_{e x}+\frac{v_{i n}}{v_{e x}} K_{i n} S_{i n}\end{aligned}\tag{3}$$
for ti≤ t≤ ti+1, where Kin and Kex describe the exchange rates. φ(t) and Φ(t) can be computed numerically using Eq.(1). By such a means, we naturally incorporate transcytolemmal water exchange in diffusion biophysical model for any finite-duration, arbitrary-shaped gradient waveforms.
Method
Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate and validate our approach. A finite difference method is used to simulate dMRI signals as reported previously3. The tissue is modeled as tightly packed, spherical cells on a face-centered-cubic lattice with vin=61.72%, Din=1.56µm2/ms, and Dex=2µm2/ms. The cell diameter d is selected from 10~15µm. The intracellular water lifetime, τin, is set to 50, 70, 100, 200, 400ms and infinite. Kin and Kex be computed3 from τin, Din, and d. The used gradient waveforms are shown in Fig. 2, and b-values are (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2) ms/μm2. Rician noise corresponding to SNR=20 is added into the simulated signals, which is repeated 100 times for each set. Then a fingerprinting-based method as previously reported is used to fit the microstructure parameters7.
Results and Discussion
Fig. 3 shows the fitting results of d. There are no statistically significant differences between the diameters extracted from the two models. This is consistent with previous reports that cell size fitting is relatively insensitive to water exchange3.
Fig. 4 shows the fitting results of vin. As reported previously, the fitted vin without considering water exchange is significantly underestimated. By contrast, our new approach significantly alleviates such underestimation and provides more accurate fits. However, the fitted vin with considering water exchange still deviates from the ground-truths and the deviation becomes more pronounced as the rate of water exchange increases (smaller τin ). This suggests the impact of water exchange has not been fully incorporated in our proposed approach yet.
Similarly, the fitting results of τin as shown in Fig. 5 do not match perfectly with the ground truths. Presumably, this is also caused by the above reason. However, there is a monotonical correlation between the fitted τin and ground truths, suggesting the proposed approach may still provide valuable information on water exchange, which cannot be obtained in conventional microstructural models.
Conclusion
In this work, we propose a general framework to incorporate transcytolemmal water exchange in diffusion biophysical models with arbitrary gradient waveforms. Such an approach can not only improve the fitting accuracy of intracellular volume fraction, but also provide additional information on transcytolemmal water exchange without additional data acquisitions. However, the underestimation of vin is alleviated but remains, and the fitted τin shows a monotonical correlation with ground truths but does not match perfectly. This indicates the impact of water exchange has not been fully incorporated in the biophysical model yet. It is currently under active investigation to further improve the accuracy of this framework.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Xu J, Jiang X, Li H, Arlinghaus LR, Gore JC. Magnetic resonance imaging of mean cell size in human breast tumors. 2019.
2. Ruggiero MR, Baroni S, Pezzana S, Ferrante G, Geninatti Crich S, Aime S. Evidence for the Role of Intracellular Water Lifetime as a Tumour Biomarker Obtained by In Vivo Field-Cycling Relaxometry. Angewandte Chemie 2018;57(25):7468-7472.
3. Li H, Jiang X, Xie J, Gore JC, Xu J. Impact of transcytolemmal water exchange on estimates of tissue microstructural properties derived from diffusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2017.
4. Fieremans E, Novikov DS, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Monte Carlo study of a two-compartment exchange model of diffusion. NMR Biomed, 2010; 23: 711-24
5. Stanisz GJ, Li JG, Wright GA, Henkelman RM. Water dynamics in human blood via combined measurements of T2 relaxation and diffusion in the presence of gadolinium. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010;39(2):223-233.
6. Callaghan PT. A Simple Matrix Formalism for Spin Echo Analysis of Restricted Diffusion underGeneralized Gradient Waveforms. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 1997;129(1):74-84.
7. Baete SH, Cloos MA, Lin YC, Placantonakis DG, Boada FE. Fingerprinting Orientation Distribution Functions in Diffusion MRI detects smaller crossing angles. Neuroimage 2019;198.