Shihui Chen1, Chia-Wei Lee2, and Hing-Chiu Chang1,3
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2GE Healthcare, Taiwan, Taiwan, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Synopsis
High-resolution 4-shot multi-echo resting-state fMRI (RS-fMRI)
can be achieved by acquiring data in a sliding window manner, and thus the
composite full k-space for MUSE reconstruction can be obtained by combining the
segments from the consecutive time points. However, the sliding window operation
may smooth the time courses and lead to a similar effect as applying a moving
average filter. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of k-space data
sharing from consecutive time points acquired with different TRs, and to determine
a feasible TR for the acquisition and reconstruction scheme for high-resolution
4-shot multi-echo RS-fMRI with MUSE.
Introduction
In our previous study, we proposed a multi-shot acquisition
scheme with sliding window to enable MUSE reconstruction1 for high-resolution
multi-echo resting-state fMRI (RS-fMRI), by pre-combining the k-space segments acquired
from consecutive time points2 into a full
k-space data. Compared
to the conventional single-shot RS-fMRI data, time series derived from composite
full k-space data may reveal smoothing effect on time courses that may be similar
to applying moving average filter (MAF)3 to the signal.
The application of MAF on time signal may cause power decrease in frequency
domain. In addition, the cut-off
frequency depends on TR and window size (equal to the number of shots used
in multi-shot fMRI with MUSE2). With a desired
number of shots (i.e., 4), TR is the dominant factor that theoretically
determines the power decrease effect in frequency spectrum. Since the
bandwidth for RS-fMRI analysis was reported within the range of 0.01-0.1Hz4-8, any influence on frequency
spectrum by incorporating sliding window (i.e., data sharing) into RS-fMRI data
reconstruction needs to be considered. In this study, we aimed to investigate
the effect of sliding window on RS-fMRI data reconstruction and to determine
the feasible TR for 4-shot RS-fMRI data using MUSE1, 2. Methods
Theory
The operation of MAF is described by the following
equation3:
$$y[n] =\sum_\left(m=0\right)^\left(M-1\right)x[n+m]$$
Where each point of the output signal y[ ] is produced
by averaging a given number M of consecutive points from the input signal x[ ].
The typical TR used for RS-fMRI acquisition is 2s9 and shorter TR (e.g.,
around 1.1s) can be achieved using multiband EPI10. The corresponding
window length of MAF is calculated as #shot
TR
for sliding window reconstruction. With a given number of
shots equal to 4, the first cut-off frequency is decreased when there is an
increase in TR (Figure 1). The roll-off of the frequency response within the bandwidth of 0.01-0.1Hz
is sharper with the increase of TR, demonstrating that a lower percentage of
spectrum power loss is associated with a shorter TR.
Data acquisition and simulation
Two sets of RS-fMRI data were acquired from 4
healthy subjects at two different TRs with a single-shot EPI (ssEPI) sequence on a 3T GE MRI scanner, using a 48-channel head coil. The parameters were as follows: TR = 1000/2000ms, TE = 30ms, matrix size = 64$$$\times$$$64, number of slices = 24, FOV = 24.3cm,
slice thickness = 3.8mm, isotropic voxel size = 3.8mm3, multiband factor
= 2. T1-weighted images were acquired
using a 3D-FSPGR sequence for anatomical registration. Two sets of GRE images
were also acquired from each individual subject to generate two sets of coil
sensitivity profiles with different random noise distribution for the
subsequent simulation. The original RS-fMRI signals using ssEPI were used as
the gold standard for all comparisons conducted in this study.
Simulation 1: To estimate the effect of MAF on time
courses, the original images acquired at TR = 1s/2s were temporally smoothed by
a 4-point MAF to respectively generate four datasets for the following analysis
and group comparison.
Simulation 2: To estimate the effect of composite full
k-space from consecutive time points using highly-accelerated data, the
original images were modulated by the first set of coil sensitivity profiles
and 2D phase error maps, and then transformed to k-space for generating
multi-coil k-space data. Afterward, the 4-fold subsampled data were generated with
the sliding window acquisition according to the acquisition strategy proposed
in our previous study2. The simulated
data were then reconstructed by MUSE with the second set of coil sensitivity
profiles.
Data evaluation
The RS-MRI data were analysed using MELODIC
implemented in FSL (FMRIB's Software Library, www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl).
After the standard pre-processing steps, the group ICA with dual regression were
performed among the following three group pairs (Figure 2) to compare the group
differences for the data acquired with either TR = 1s or 2s, respectively.Results
Without considering Bonferroni correction,
the p-values in Figure 3 indicated that the significant
increases can be observed in mesial visual component (p<0.0143) in the
original ssEPI data acquired with TR = 1 in 1st group pair.
With TR = 2s, the significant differences were found in DMN (p<0.0286) in 1st
group pair and lateralized fronto-parietal component (p<0.0429) in 2nd
group pair (Figure 4).Discussion and conclusion
With consideration of Bonferroni correction, the
p-value that indicates the significant differences should be 0.5/(8x2) = 0.03125 because only eight resting state
networks11 were observed in this
study. In this case, the significant differences were only shown in 1st
group comparison (ssEPI vs. ssEPI + 4-point MAF). In 2nd group
comparison (ssEPI vs. composite k-space + MUSE), no significant differences
were found with Bonferroni correction. Notably, no significant differences were
observed in 2nd group comparison with TR = 1s whether Bonferroni
correction was considered or not, demonstrating that shorter TR had less effect on frequency spectrum. Furthermore, no significant differences were shown in 3rd
group comparison (composite k-space + MUSE vs. ssEPI +4-point MAF), suggesting
that the two processing methods had similar effect on the RS-fMRI signal. To
conclude, the combination of k-space data sharing from consecutive time points
with subsequent MUSE reconstruction is feasible for 4-shot RS-fMRI when TR is equal
to 2s or shorter. Acknowledgements
The work
was in part supported by grants from Hong Kong Research Grant Council (GRFs 17121517,
17106820, and 17125321).References
1.Chen,
N.-k., A. Guidon, H.-C. Chang, and A.W. Song. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion
weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE).
Neuroimage. 2013; 72: 41-47.
2.CHEN,
S., M. Chu, Q. Chan, et al. Multi-Echo
Multi-Segment EPI Based fMRI Using Sliding-Window Acquisition and Multiplexed
Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE). in International
Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 28th Annual Meeting. 2020.
3.Smith,
S.W. The scientist and engineer's guide
to digital signal processing. 1997.
4.Biswal,
B., F. Zerrin Yetkin, V.M. Haughton, and J.S. Hyde. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain
using echo‐planar MRI. Magnetic
resonance in medicine. 1995; 34(4):
537-541.
5.Biswal,
B.B., J.V. Kylen, and J.S. Hyde. Simultaneous
assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting‐state
functional connectivity maps. NMR in Biomedicine: An International Journal
Devoted to the Development and Application of Magnetic Resonance In Vivo. 1997;
10(4‐5): 165-170.
6.Cordes,
D., V.M. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, et al. Frequencies
contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in
“resting-state” data. American journal of neuroradiology. 2001; 22(7): 1326-1333.
7.Lowe,
M.J., M. Dzemidzic, J.T. Lurito, V.P. Mathews, and M.D. Phillips. Correlations in low-frequency BOLD
fluctuations reflect cortico-cortical connections. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(5): 582-587.
8.Lowe,
M., B. Mock, and J. Sorenson. Resting
state fMRI signal correlations in multi-slice EPI. Neuroimage. 1996; 3(3): S257.
9.Yuan,
B.-K., J. Wang, Y.-F. Zang, and D.-Q. Liu. Amplitude
differences in high-frequency fMRI signals between eyes open and eyes closed
resting states. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2014; 8: 503.
10.Podgórski,
P., M. Waliszewska-Prosół, A. Zimny, M. Sąsiadek, and J. Bladowska. Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the
Ageing Female Brain—Differences Between Young and Elderly Female Adults on
Multislice Short TR rs-fMRI. Frontiers in neurology. 2021; 12.
11.Rosazza, C. and L. Minati. Resting-state brain networks: literature
review and clinical applications. Neurological sciences. 2011; 32(5): 773-785.