Hyun Seok Moon1,2,3, Seonghoon Kim1,4, Thanh Tan Vo1,2,3, Geun Ho Im1, Myunghwan Choi1,4, and Seong-Gi Kim1,2,3
1Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 4School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Cortex-wide,
spatial-patterned optogenetic mouse fMRI with online stimulation planning in
situ.
Introduction
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI) in animals has contributed to discovering neurophysiological bases of
whole-brain activity, combined with a variety of invasive methods.
Particularly, optogenetic fMRI1
has been a powerful method for in vivo mapping of functional connections
by controlling neural activity with cell-type specificity, which is extremely
useful in the cortex where numerous types of neurons are intermingled2. In optogenetic fMRI studies, light
stimulation is conveyed through a fiber optic implanted at the target area3. Although inevitable for deep brain
stimulation, it limits the experimental flexibility as the location to be
stimulated is predetermined during surgical implantation. Here, we introduce a
hybrid system integrating spatial-patterned, cortex-wide optogenetic
stimulation4 with 9.4T mouse
fMRI, enabling online stimulation planning based on optical or MR images in
situ. We demonstrate the capability of our system in planning arbitrarily
shaped optical stimulation based on the brain atlas, intrinsic optical imaging,
and retrograde ChR2 virus with fluorescent indicators.Methods
We integrated 9.4T whole-brain mouse fMRI
with cortical wide-field imaging5
and patterned optogenetics4 (Fig.
1a). To relay the light fields for optogenetics and imaging
bidirectionally, a fiber bundle (comprised of 100,000 optical fibers) bridges
between the external optic setup and MRI. Patterned optogenetic stimulation was
implemented using a digital micromirror device (DMD) composed of 2560x1600
pixels, which controls individual pixels to be on or off. As only “on” pixels
reflect the incident beam into the fiber bundle, we were able to deliver
patterned optogenetic stimulus (455 nm) in any arbitrary shape onto the mouse
cortex within the MR bore. We also incorporated a wide-field imaging system
allowing cortical surface imaging in either reflectance or fluorescence mode
for superficial intrinsic optical signals or the expression of genetically
encoded fluorescent indicators. The excitation light for imaging was delivered
via an auxiliary illumination fiber coupled to a light-emitting diode (530 nm).
Each optical mount, made of MR-compatible plastic, was designed to have
translational or rotational adjustments for fine-tuning the image focus and
magnification. To obtain whole-brain fMRI with optogenetic stimulation and
optical imaging, we prepared the thinned-skull cranial window as shown in Fig.
1b. We used optically transparent D2O-based agarose gel devoid
of MRI signals to reduce the magnetic susceptibility artifacts. Three or four
phantoms made of a small polyethylene tube encasing H2O-based
fluorescent rhodamine B solution were positioned at the circumference of the
thinned-skull window for coregistration between optical and MR images (Fig.
1c and Fig. 2a). The coregistration accuracy was assessed by the
overlapping of the pial vascular structure.
Mouse
fMRI was obtained with 2D (FOV: 16 (right-left) × 8 (dorsal-ventral) × 9 (anterior-posterior)
mm3, voxel size: 0.167 × 0.167 × 0.5 mm3, TR: 1 s) or 3D
(FOV: 16 (right-left) × 8 (dorsal-ventral) × 12 (anterior-posterior) mm3,
voxel size: 0.2 mm isotropic, volume TR: 2 s) gradient-echo EPI. We
intravenously administered monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) to
obtain CBV (cerebral blood volume)-weighted fMRI, which provides higher spatial
specificity and contrast-to-noise ratio than conventional BOLD fMRI6.Results
The stimulation sites can be decided by utilizing
various types of images either from the optical setup or MRI. To demonstrate
this capability, we first created an atlas-based stimulation map by
coregistration of our customized mouse brain atlas (based on Allen brain atlas)
onto the subject’s fluorescence image (Fig. 2a, b). Note that this procedure, typically done in ~30
min, can be conducted before every experiment to generate patterned optogenetic
inputs for individual mice. This stimulation map was used to measure
region-specific functional connection in Thy1-ChR2-EYFP mice (channelrhodopsin
expression specifically in excitatory neurons). Fig. 2c shows fMRI activation maps evoked by 3 representative ROIs (N=6
animals). Each stimulus induced an increase of CBV in the functionally
connected regions.
The target region can also be planned by localizing
sensory input-induced activation. Simultaneous optical intrinsic signal imaging
(OISI; 530 nm for CBV-weighted imaging) and fMRI identified the peak response
region in the cortex by forepaw stimulation (Fig. 3a-c). Optogenetic stimulation on the peak region induced responses in the
somatosensory network, comparable to forepaw stimulation (Fig. 3d). However, the amplitude of the response to
optogenetic stimulation is much higher than the forepaw response, demonstrating
the effectiveness of patterned optogenetic stimulation to detect the cortical
functional network.
A fluorescent tracer can be utilized to confine the
target neurons in a circuit-specific manner. A retrograde AAV-ChR2 virus (rAAV2-retro-hSyn-hChR2-EYFP)
was injected into the left inferior colliculus (IC), which transfects cortical
neurons projecting to IC. We confirmed YFP fluorescence expressed in the
auditory/retrosplenial/visual/somatosensory areas (Fig. 4; YFP fluorescence) by overlaying the atlas. Three stimulus patterns
planned from the YFP image evoked activation in IC but not much in other
projection sites (Fig.
4).Discussion & Conclusion
In summary, we developed a hybrid system combining whole-brain fMRI and
cortex-wide optics that provide high flexibility in planning subject-specific patterned
optogenetic stimulation. Note that our optic module can be easily assembled
with commercially available parts and integrated with existing preclinical MR
systems. Thus, we expect that this setup can be readily adopted in various fMRI
studies that require i) cell-type-specific stimulation on multiple sites for
mapping functional cortico-cortical or subcortical networks or ii) in situ
subject-specific stimulation localization based on anatomical or functional
imaging. Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the
Institute of Basic Science (IBS-R015-D1) and the Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry
of Education (2019R1C1C1011180, 2019M3A9E2061789, 2019M3E5D2A01058329,
2020M3C1B8016137, and 2020R1A5A1018081).References
1. Lee,
J.H. et al. Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined
optogenetically by type and wiring. Nature. 2010;465:788.
2. Molyneaux,
B.J., Arlotta, P., Menezes, J.R. & Macklis, J.D. Neuronal subtype specification
in the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:427-437.
3. Moon,
H.S. et al. Contribution of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neuronal Activity to BOLD
fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31:4053-4067.
4. Leifer,
A.M., Fang-Yen, C., Gershow, M., Alkema, M.J. & Samuel, A.D. Optogenetic
manipulation of neural activity in freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Methods. 2011;8:147-152.
5. Lake,
E.M.R. et al. Simultaneous cortex-wide fluorescence Ca(2+) imaging and
whole-brain fMRI. Nat Methods. 2020;17:1262-1271.
6. Zhao, F., Wang, P., Hendrich, K.,
Ugurbil, K. & Kim, S.-G. Cortical layer-dependent BOLD and CBV responses
measured by spin-echo and gradient-echo fMRI: insights into hemodynamic
regulation. Neuroimage. 2006;30:1149-1160.