Ming Lu1, Zhangyan Yang2,3, Feng Wang2,4, Gary Drake2,4, Li Min Chen2,4, John Gore2,3,4, and Xinqiang Yan2,4
1College of nuclear equipment and nuclear engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, China, 2Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Simultaneous imaging of brain and spinal cord regions potentially provides valuable information about how they
work together and interact. However, to date, almost all studies have
investigated these two highly interconnected systems separately, mainly because
of a lack of adequate imaging coils. We
designed a volume Tx and conformal receive array dedicated to simultaneous
imaging of squirrel monkey brain and spinal cord at 9.4 T. The coil exhibits excellent
SNR in both brain and spinal cord areas and can be used for studies investigating
how the brain and spinal cord work together.
Introduction:
Functional
and structural MRI play important roles in understanding the relationships
between the organization of spinal cord and brain [1-3]. For example, the
processing of innocuous touch and painful stimuli engages circuits within the
grey matters of both spinal cord and the brain’s somatosensory cortex [4]. These spinal cord
and brain regions interact constantly to execute behavioral demands originating
in the brain’s high cognitive areas such as goal-oriented limb movement.
Simultaneous imaging of these separate regions potentially provides valuable
information about how they work together and interact. However, to date, almost
all studies have investigated these two highly interconnected systems separately,
mainly because of a lack of adequate imaging coils. Simultaneous brain and
spinal cord imaging requires a volume coil for transmit and local multiple coil
arrays for reception in order to achieve uniform transmit fields as well as
optimal signal-to-noise ratio in both brain and spinal cord regions. Although dedicated
Rx arrays for brain and C-spine have been developed for human scanners [5-6], such a coil for NHP
imaging in preclinical scanners has not previously been described. The target
of this work was therefore to design and construct a Tx/Rx array for simultaneous
brain and spinal cord imaging of squirrel monkeys.Methods:
Overall
system
The
coil (volume Tx + 4-ch receive array) and animal holding system were designed
and constructed for a Varian DirectDriveTM horizontal 9.4-T
preclinical scanner (bore clearance 11.7 cm) which provides one Tx and 4 Rx channels
for proton imaging. Figure 1 depicts how the volume Tx coil and receive array were
interfaced to the scanner.
Volume
Tx coil
The
Tx coil is a high-pass quadrature birdcage with up-to-16 legs and thereby able
to provide a homogenous area over a large volume (Figure 2a). The volume coil
has a length of 10 cm and an inner diameter of 8.5 cm. Cable outer conductors
were directly connected to the RF shield by 330-pF DC-block capacitors to
realize a balun-free drive. Due to the proximity of the birdcage coil to the receive
array, up to 16 series PIN diodes were employed to achieve detuning in the
receive phase. These diodes were connected in series and driven by a single
12V/50mA detune signal. Half of the distributed capacitors (8.2 pF) in the end
rings were bridged by RF chokes to allow the DC current to run through all PIN
diodes.
Receive
array
Similar
to state-of-art human coils, the Rx array was arranged to maximize the filling
factor and SNR (Figure 2b). The number of Rx coils was chosen to match the
available Rx channels. The Rx array consists of 1 top loop covering the
anterior brain, one bottom loop covering the posterior brain and the cervical spinal
cord, and two loops covering side regions. The coil housing was designed in
SolidWorks to match the curves of a squirrel monkey’s head and neck. Adjacent loops
were decoupled by overlapping and opposite loops were decoupled with transformers.
Shielded cable traps were employed immediately after the Rx coils to reduce the
common-mode current flowing on the cable's outer conductor.
Bench
test and MR imaging experiment
Prior
to MR experiments, properties of both the Tx coil and the receive array were measured
on the bench with a four-port Keysight 5071C VNA. We also evaluated the
detuning performance of the Tx and Rx coils with a pair of well-decoupled
pick-up probes. GRE images using the volume Tx+4-ch Rx array were acquired on
a monkey-head-shaped phantom for SNR assessments. As a comparison, we also
acquired GRE images on a commercial volume coil from Doty Scientific (inner diameter
8.5 cm).Results:
Bench
test
Figure
3 shows the measured S-parameter matrix of quadrature channels of the Tx coil
and the four Rx coils. The Rx coil was detuned when measuring the S-parameter
of Tx coils, and vice versa. The quadrature ports of the Tx volume coil have high isolation of ~-20 dB, while the inter-element isolation of the receive
array ranges from -15.2 dB to -20 dB. Both the transmit coil and the four receive coils could be well-tuned to 400.6 MHz and matched to 50 Ω (S11<-25 dB) with
a large variety of loadings by using the tuning rods. Table 1 lists the detune
performance of Tx and Rx coils. Excellent detuning performance (<-25 dB) can
be achieved by active detune circuits in the Tx coil’s rungs and Rx coils.
SNR
maps
Figure
4 plots the multi-slice sagittal SNR maps on the phantom using the Doty coil
and the constructed Tx coil+Rx array. Substantial SNR increases were observed
by using the close-fitting Rx array, with average SNR gain at brain/c-spinal
cord area of ~37%/43%.Conclusions:
We
designed a volume Tx and conformal Rx array dedicated to simultaneous
imaging of squirrel monkey brain and spinal cord at 9.4 T. The coil exhibits excellent
SNR in both brain and spinal cord areas and can be used for studies investigating
how the brain and spinal cord work together.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by NIH grant NS092961 and DOD grant W81XWH-17-1-0304. This
work was performed during the period of Dr. Ming Lu’s visit to Vanderbilt
University Institute of Imaging Science.References
- P. Nash et al., “Functional
magnetic resonance imaging identifies somatotopic organization of nociception
in the human spinal cord,” PAIN®, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 776–781, Jun.
2013, doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.008.
- J. W. Thorpe, I. F. Moseley, C. H.
Hawkes, D. G. MacManus, W. I. McDonald, and D. H. Miller, “Brain and spinal
cord MRI in motor neuron disease.,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &
Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 314–317, Sep. 1996, doi:
10.1136/jnnp.61.3.314.
- R. L. Barry, S. A. Smith, A. N. Dula,
and J. C. Gore, “Resting state functional connectivity in the human spinal
cord,” eLife, vol. 3, p. e02812, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.7554/eLife.02812.
- “Injury alters intrinsic functional
connectivity within the primate spinal cord | PNAS.”
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/19/5991.long (accessed Nov. 03, 2021).
- J. Cohen-Adad, A. Mareyam, B. Keil, J.
R. Polimeni, and L. L. Wald, “32-Channel RF coil optimized for brain and
cervical spinal cord at 3 T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66,
no. 4, pp. 1198–1208, 2011, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22906.
- B. Zhang, A. C. Seifert, J. Kim, J.
Borrello, and J. Xu, “7 Tesla 22-channel wrap-around coil array for cervical
spinal cord and brainstem imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol.
78, no. 4, pp. 1623–1634, 2017, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26538.