Yinghao Zhang1, Yue Hu1, and Xin Lu2
1School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2School of Computer Science and Informatics, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Low-rank tensor models have been applied in
accelerating dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Recently, a new tensor nuclear
norm based on t-SVD has been proposed and applied to tensor completion.
Inspired by the different properties of the tensor nuclear norm (TNN) and the
Casorati matrix nuclear norm (MNN), we introduce a novel dMRI reconstruction
method combining TNN and Casorati MNN, which we term as TMNN. Moreover, we
convert the the TMNN dMRI reconstruction problem into a simple tensor completion
problem, which can be efficiently solved by the alternating direction method of
multipliers (ADMM).
Introduction
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is one
of the most important non-invasive imaging modalities. However, it is usually
challenging to obtain dynamic MR images with high spatiotemporal resolution
within clinically acceptable scan time. Low-rank tensor priors1–3 have been successfully applied to
reconstruct dynamic MR images from highly undersampled k-space data to
accelerate dMRI. Recently, a new easy-computed tensor decomposition called
tensor singular value decomposition4 (t-SVD) and a new tensor nuclear norm5 (TNN) have been proposed. Some works have adopted
this framework to reconstruct dMRI. Banco et al.6 have applied t-SVD in dMRI reconstruction on a
specific sampling mask. TNN and total variation (TV) regularizations7 are combined to improve the reconstruction of
dMRI. Moreover, we notice that the TNN and Casorati matrix nuclear norm (MNN) has
distinct properties, and thereby introduce a novel dMRI reconstruction method combining
TNN and Casorati MNN, named TMNN.Methods
We denote the distortion-free dynamic MR tensor image as $$$\mathcal{X} \in \mathbb{C}^{n_{1} \times n_{2} \times n_{3}}$$$, where $$$n_1$$$,
$$$n_2$$$ denote the spatial coordinates, and $$$n_3$$$ is the temporal coordinate. The data
acquisition of dMRI can be modeled as
$$ \mathbf b = A(\mathcal{X}) +\mathbf{n}$$
where $$$\mathbf b \in \mathbb{C}^{m}$$$ is the
observed undersampled $$$k$$$-space data, $$$A: \mathbb{C}^{n_{1} \times n_{2} \times
n_{3}} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^m$$$ is the Fourier sampling operator, and
$$$\mathbf{n} \in \mathbb{C}^{m}$$$ is the Gaussian distributed white noise. Inspired by the different properties of the
TNN and the Casorati MNN, we propose a novel algorithm combining TNN and
Casorati MNN, which we term as TMNN. The optimization problem can be formulated
as follows
$$\min_{\mathcal{X}} \frac12 {\Vert A(\mathcal{X})-\mathbf b \Vert}_F^2+\lambda_1{\Vert \mathcal{X} \Vert}_*+\lambda_2{\Vert \mathbf C (\mathcal{X}) \Vert}_*$$
where $$${\Vert \mathcal{X} \Vert}_*$$$ is the tensor nuclear norm of $$${\cal X}$$$, $$$\mathbf C: \mathbb{C}^{n_{1} \times n_{2} \times n_{3}} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^{n_{1} n_{2} \times n_{3}}$$$ unfolds the tensor into a Casorati matrix, $$${\Vert \mathbf C (\mathcal{X}) \Vert}_*$$$ denotes the nuclear norm of the Casorati matrix $$$\mathbf C(\mathcal{X})$$$, and $$$\lambda_1$$$, $$$\lambda_2$$$ are the regularization parameters.
We notice that the dMRI image $$$\mathcal{X}$$$
and its k-space $$$\hat{\mathcal{X}}$$$ have equal TNN and MNN. Thus, in the
case of Cartesian sampling, where $$$ A=\mathcal{S}\mathcal{F}$$$, $$$\mathcal{S}$$$
is the under-sampling mask and $$$\mathcal{F}$$$ transforms the dMRI image into
k-space, we can rewrite the reconstruction model above as a simple tensor
completion optimization problem
$$\min_{\hat{\mathcal{X}}} \frac12 {\Vert S
\hat{\mathcal{X}}-\mathbf b \Vert}_F^2+\lambda_1{\Vert \hat{\mathcal{X}}
\Vert}_*+\lambda_2{\Vert \mathbf C(\hat{\mathcal{X}}) \Vert}_*$$
which can be solved in alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM).Results and discussion
We evaluate the performance of the proposed
TMNN method based on two data, i.e., a cardiac cine MR image with the size of
$$$256\times 256\times 10$$$ and a myocardial perfusion MR image with the size of
$$$190\times 90\times 70$$$. We assume that the measurements are acquired using the
pseudo radial Cartesian sampling and variable density random
sampling patterns under different undersampling ratios. We also add complex
Gaussian white noise with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 20dB to the
undersampled k-space data. The balancing parameters are experimentally set to
be $$$\lambda_1=2.5e^{-3}$$$ and $$$\lambda_2=7.5e^{-3}$$$ for the noiseless case, and
$$$\lambda_1=\lambda_2=0.1$$$ for the noisy case.
In Fig.1, we compare the recovery
results of the TMNN with MNN on a cine cardiac MR image from 30 radial lines
(undersampling ratio $$$\sim$$$0.1) in the noiseless case. We observe that the
proposed TMNN model outperforms the MNN method in providing more accurate
reconstruction. Fig.2 shows the reconstruction of the cine cardiac MR
image from the noisy undersampled measurements using 30 radial lines. In
Fig.3, we plot the noisy reconstruction results of the perfusion MR
image from the variable density random sampling trajectory with the
undersampling ratio of 0.3. It is observed that the TMNN method generates less
error compared with the MNN approach.
The SNRs of the reconstructed dynamic image
using TNN, MNN, and the proposed TMNN at different undersampling conditions are
shown in Table.1. We observe that except for one case, the proposed
TMNN consistently provides the best reconstruction results and improves the SNR
by up to 2dB over the MNN method.
In addition, it is shown that the
improvement of the proposed TMNN over MNN is more significant in the noisy
setting.Conclusion
We proposed a novel combined regularization algorithm for dMRI
reconstruction. By combining the tensor nuclear norm and the Casorati matrix
nuclear norm, both the low-rank properties of the tensor and the Casorati matrix can be captured to exploit the spatiotemporal structures, and thus
further improve the reconstruction performance. Moreover, we we convert
the dynamic MRI reconstruction into a simple tensor completion problem, which
can simplify the solution of the reconstruction problem. In order to
efficiently solve the proposed optimization problem, we adopt the ADMM
algorithm. Experimental results
demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed TMNN model over the
low-rank matrix recovery method.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- Kolda T G, Bader B W. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM review, 2009, 51(3): 455-500.
- He J, Liu Q, Christodoulou A G, et al. Accelerated high-dimensional MR imaging with sparse sampling using low-rank tensors. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2016, 35(9): 2119-2129.
- Cui K. Dynamic MRI reconstruction via weighted tensor nuclear norm regularizer. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2021.
- Kilmer M E, Martin C D. Factorization strategies for third-order tensors. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2011, 435(3): 641-658.
- Lu C, Feng J, Chen Y, et al. Tensor robust principal component analysis with a new tensor nuclear norm. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2019, 42(4): 925-938.
- Banco D, Aeron S, Hoge W S. Sampling and recovery of MRI data using low rank tensor models. 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2016: 448-452.
- Ai J, Ma S, Du H, et al. Dynamic MRI reconstruction using tensor-SVD. 2018 14th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP). IEEE, 2018: 1114-1118.