Takumi Ogawa1, Kayoko Abe2, Yutaka Hamatani1, Yasuhiro Goto1, Masami Yoneyama3, Quin Lu4, Isao Shiina1, Kazuo Kodaira1, Mana Kato1, Michinobu Nagao2, and Shuji Sakai2
1Department of Radiological Services, Tokyo Woman's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Diagnostic imaging & Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Woman's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, 3Philips Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 4Philips Healthcare NA, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Double
Echo Steady-State (DESS) with water-selective excitation is a useful sequence
to depict small nerves such as intracranial nerves, it would also be promising
for visualizing lumbar nerves. Recently, accelerated qDESS sequence combined
with compressed sensing sensitivity encoding (Compressed SENSE) has been
proposed for further rapid knee morphological and quantitative imaging. In this
study, we evaluate the feasibility of the accelerated qDESS sequence for
visualization and quantification of the lumbosacral plexus within a short scan
time.
INTRODUCTION
MR neurography facilitates the assessment
of peripheral nerve pathologies1-3, and a quantitative evaluation by
using T2 values can be clinically useful in estimating treatment effects and
determining prognosis as well as diffusion tensor imaging4.
SHINKEI-Quant5-7 is one of the useful techniques to add quantitative
information to MR neurography based on two-different preparation times of
motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (MSDE)-prepared fat-suppressed 3D
T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE)8.9. SHINKEI-Quant can
simultaneously provide MR neurography and T2 maps within clinically feasible
scan times (around 6 minutes); however, it is still challenging for shortening
acquisition time and/or achieving higher spatial resolution because it
basically requires doubled 3D TSE acquisition with different MSDE prep-TE
images for T2 quantification.
Double Echo Steady-State (DESS) with
water-selective excitation is a useful sequence to depict small nerves such as
intracranial nerves10,11, it would also be promising for visualizing
lumbar nerves. Furthermore, 3D quantitative DESS (qDESS) offers a rapid
simultaneous 3D morphometry and T2 relaxometry12-14. Recently,
accelerated qDESS sequence combined with compressed sensing sensitivity
encoding (Compressed SENSE) has been proposed for further rapid knee
morphological and quantitative imaging15. In this study, we evaluate
the feasibility of the accelerated qDESS sequence for visualization and
quantification of the lumbosacral plexus within a short scan time.METHODS
A total of six volunteers and one patient
were examined on a 3.0T system
(Ingenia, Philips Healthcare). The study was approved by the local IRB,
and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
qDESS sequence provides two different TE
images. We used the weighted-addition images of both TEs as the MR neurography,
and T2 quantification was performed by inverting the qDESS signal model14 (Figure 1).
To validate both the neurography images and
the T2 maps obtained by qDESS, coronal lumbosacral plexus images were acquired
and were quantitatively compared with conventional methods. Neurography images
were compared with water-selective excited T2FFE-based neurogpraphy16,17
and SHINKEI-Quant for image quality. We measured the SNR of the nerves (average
value of both the left and right dorsal root ganglion from L4 to S1) and iliopsoas muscle
using dynamic noise scan method, and the contrast ratio (CR) between the nerve
and the iliopsoas muscle. SNRnerve, SNRmuscle and CRnerve-muscle
were then calculated as follows: SNRnerve = SI nerve / SDnoise
nerve, SNRmuscle= SI muscle / SDnoise muscle, CRnerve-muscle
= [SI nerve – SI muscle] / [SI nerve + SI muscle] where SI nerve and SI muscle
are the mean average signal intensity of the nerves and muscles respectively,
and the corresponding SDnoise is the standard deviation at the same
location on the noise images. Subsequently, the T2 maps were assessed for
accuracy by comparing with a 2D multi-echo spin-echo (2D-SE) T2 mapping and
SHINKEI-Quant. We measured the T2 value of the nerves and iliopsoas muscles, respectively.
The SNR, CR and T2 values were assessed by using one-way repeated measures
ANOVA, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Steel-Dwass test.
Imaging parameters for respective sequences are as follows.
qDESS: FFE,
FOV=300*300mm, voxel size=0.8*0.8*2mm3, slice
thickness=-1mm, flip angle=25, TR=16ms, TE=4.9ms, ProSet water excitation
1331,
NSA=1, CS-SENSE=2.5 and acquisition time=3min4s.
T2-FFE: FFE, FOV=300*300mm, voxel
size=0.8*0.8*2mm3, slice thickness=-1mm, flip angle=35,
TR=9.9ms, TE=5.0ms, ProSet water excitation 1331, NSA=1, CS-SENSE=1.6 and
acquisition time=3min1s.
SHINKEI-Quant: TSE, FOV=300*380mm,
voxel
size=1.3*1.3*4mm3, slice
thickness=-2mm, flip angle=90, TR=3919ms, TE=97ms,
TSE factor 90, SPAIR inversion delay was 240ms, NSA=2, CS-SENSE=4 and acquisition
time=9m32s.
2D-SE: GraSE, FOV=300*300mm, voxel
size=0.9*1.1*3mm, slice thickness=0mm, flip angle=90, TR=1846ms,
TE=20ms*5, TSE factor 5, EPI factor 5, SPIR strong, NSA=1, CS-SENSE=1.5 and
acquisition time=4min37s.RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Figure 2 (a) shows the representative MR
neurography images using qDESS, SHINKEI-Quant and T2-FFE, and (b) shows
representative T2 map images using 2D-SE, qDESS and SHINKEI-Quant. Figure 3 (a)
shows the SNR (of the nerve and iliopsoas muscle) comparison of qDESS and T2-FFE.
qDESS showed significantly higher SNR in both nerve and iliopsoas muscle compared
to T2-FFE. Figure 3 (b) shows the CRnerve-muscle among three
sequences. In CRnerve-muscle, SHINKEI-Quant showed the highest
value, but there was no significant difference in comparison with qDESS. Figure
4 shows the comparison of T2 values among SHINKEI-Quant, conventional 2D-SE T2
mapping and qDESS. The T2 values obtained with qDESS in each tissue indicated
slightly shorter T2 value compared to those from conventional T2 mapping.
Nevertheless, the T2 value of nerves measured in qDESS correlated with the one
measured in conventional T2 mapping (r=0.8, p=0.016). Thus, the T2 values
measured in qDESS may have same trends with one measured in conventional T2
mapping. Figure 5 shows the results of initial clinical evaluation. In a
patient with nerve compression by lumbar disc herniation, T2 value of nerves
indicated longer value compared with that of uncompressed nerves.CONCLUSION
Accelerated qDESS
simultaneously provides high-resolution MR neurography with high SNR and CR and
T2 maps with T2 values similar to conventional methods with 3 minutes. This
sequence may be helpful to quantitatively assess nerve pathology.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Filler AG, et al. Application of
Magnetic Resonance Neurography in the Evaluation of Patients with Peripheral
Nerve Pathology. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:299-309.
2. Chhabra A, et al. High-Resolution 3T MR
Neurography of the Brachial Plexus and Its Branches, with Emphasis on 3D
Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:486–97
3. Vargas MI, et al. Three-Dimensional MR
Imaging of the Brachial Plexus. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:137-48.
4. Karampinos DC, et al. Diffusion Tensor
Imaging and T2 Relaxometry of Bilateral Lumbar Nerve Roots: Feasibility of
In-plane Iimaging. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:630–637.
5. Yoneyama M, et al. SHINKEI Quant:
Simultaneous Acquisition of MR Neurography and T2 Mapping for Quantitative
Evaluation of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy. Proc Intl Soc
Mag Reson Med. 2016;24:1322.
6. Hiwatashi A, et al. Evaluation of
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: New Simultaneous T2 mapping
and neurography method with 3D Nerve-Sheath Signal Increased with Inked
Rest-Tissue Rapid Acquisition of Relaxation Enhancement Imaging (SHINKEI
Quant). Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2016;24:2261.
7. Yoneyama M, et al. Quantitative MR
Neurography with Robust Fat Suppression. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med.
2018;26:5400.
8. Yoneyama M, et al. Rapid high resolution
MR neurography with a diffusion-weighted pre-pulse. Magn Reson Med Sci.
2013;12:111-9.
9. Kasper JM, et al. SHINKEI-a novel 3D
isotropic MR neurography technique: technical advantages over 3DIRTSE-based
imaging. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1672-7.
10. Qin Y, et al. 3D double-echo
steady-state with water excitation MR imaging of the intraparotid facial nerve
at 1.5T: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Aug;32(7):1167-72. doi:
10.3174/ajnr.A2480.
11. Fujii H, et al. Visualization of the
Peripheral Branches of the Mandibular Division of the Trigeminal Nerve on 3D
Double-Echo Steady-State with Water Excitation Sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2015 Jul;36(7):1333-7. doi:
10.3174/ajnr.A4288.
12 Chaudhari AS. et al. Combined 5-minute
double-echo in steady-state with separated echoes and 2-minute proton-density-weighted
2D FSE sequence for comprehensive whole-joint knee MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imag. 2019;49(7): e183-e194.
13. Lu Q, et al. Knee T2 relaxometry using quantitative DESS: reproducibility across
imaging vendors. Proc. ISMRM:2019.4473.
14. Sveinsson B, et al. A simple analytic
method for estimating T2 in the knee from DESS. Magn Reson Imaging.
2016;38:63-70.
15. Lu Q, et al. Application of Compressed
Sensing to Quantitative Double Echo steady state (qDESS) for Rapid T2
Relaxometry in Knees. Proc. ISMRM:2020.2733.
16. Philippens ME, et al. Tracing the
cranial nerve pathways nV and nVII with 3D T2-FFE. Proc. ISMRM:2012.1059.
17. Crijns S, et al. MR neurography using a
3D T2-FFE sequence with binomial RF-pulse selective excitation. Proc. ISMRM:2012.1060.
18. Zwanenburg et al. MR Angiography of the
cerebral perforating arteries with magnetization prepared anatomical reference
at 7T: comparison with time-of-flight. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28: 1519–1526