Zihan Ning1, Shuo Chen1, Zhensen Chen2, Hualu Han1, Huiyu Qiao1, Rui Shen1, Peng Wu3, and Xihai Zhao1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 3Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
We
proposed a Saturated Multi-delay Arterial Spin Labeling (SAMURAI) technique
with a correspondingly modified kinetic model to achieve simultaneous
acquisitions of RBF, aBAT, tBAT and T1 map in kidney with a single scan. SAMURAI
provided T1 map with excellent correlation (R2=0.976) compared with
IR-SE. Compared with multi-TI FAIR, SAMURAI provided equally reliable ASL and
T1 quantification results (ICC: 0.875-0.958) with excellent scan-rescan
repeatability (ICC: 0.905-0.992) and significantly reduced scan time (45’ vs 4’6’’
for 9 TIs).
Introduction
Arterial spin
labeling (ASL) and T1 mapping are promising tools for diagnosis, prognosis
prediction, and treatment monitoring in many kidney diseases in terms of
function and structure. The corresponding quantitative parameters including
renal blood flow (RBF), arterial bolus arrival time (aBAT), tissue BAT (tBAT)
and T1-map enable early detection of kidney diseases1,2. However,
acquiring above multiparametric information usually needs repeated scans for
multi-TI ASL and extra T1 mapping sequence, which prolongs scan time and limits
clinical practicality. In this study, we proposed a Saturated Multi-delay
Arterial Spin Labeling (SAMURAI) technique with a correspondingly modified
kinetic model to achieve simultaneous acquisitions of RBF, aBAT, tBAT and T1
map in kidney with a single scan. Methods
Sequence design: The
SAMURAI sequence consists of a pre-saturation pulses at imaging slice followed
by a nonselective (ns) or slice-selective (ss) inversion pulse for ASL acquisition
and Look-Locker SPGR readout (Fig 1). Nine TIs of the Look-Locker SPGR sampling
series ranged from 0.3 to2.7s with a step size of 0.3s. QUIPSS II pulses3
were performed at bolus duration $$$\tau=1.2s$$$. Other
imaging parameters include: TE/TR 1.96/3.9ms, TFE factor 30, flip angle 6°, slice thickness 6mm, 40 averages, and CS-SENSE factor 3.2.
Phantom Experiment: Phantom
experiment was performed on a 3T MR scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, Best,
The Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil. The SAMURAI (FOV 135×71mm2, in-plane resolution 1.6×1.6mm2, slice
thickness 6mm) and a series of standard IR-SE sequences
(14 TIs: 0.1:0.1:1/1.5/2/2.5/3s, TE/TR 9.3/10000ms, same FOV and resolution)
were performed for T1-mapping validation.
In-vivo Experiment: Eleven
healthy volunteers (5 males, mean age: 25.0±2.1years)
and one patient (male, 23-year-old) with renal calculus were recruited for MRI
experiments with informed consent. The experiments were conducted on the same
MR scanner with a 16-channel torso coil and a 12-channel posterior coil. The
SAMURAI sequence was acquired twice (FOV 288×288mm2,
in-plane resolution 3×3mm2,
slice thickness 6mm, scan time 4’6’’) under untrained
free breathing. A series of multi-TI FAIR sequences4 with the same
parameters as SAMURAI except for utilization of the Look-Locker strategy (45’
for 9 TIs) were performed for validation of T1 and ASL quantification.
Image Analysis: All
analyses were performed on MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick) as shown in Fig 2. To address
the respiratory motion, all data sets were registered by a retrospective motion
correction on Elastix5 with a non-rigid principle component analysis-based
(PCA-based) groupwise registration6. T1-map of SAMURAI was obtained
by dictionary-based methods, with the dictionary generated by Bloch simulation
(T1 100:5:3500ms) and minimum Euclidean distance for the best matching. For ASL
quantification including RBF, aBAT, and tBAT, a stepwise kinetic model was
proposed based on the classic Buxton model7, taking into account the
process that blood firstly flows into arteries at the imaging slab and then
into the kidney tissue. Besides, impact on ASL signal due to Look-Locker
sampling scheme were also corrected in the proposed model (Fig 3).Results
The proposed
SAMURAI technique can provide accurate T1 map (Fig 4a) with excellent
correlation (R2=0.976) compared with IR-SE (Fig 2b). Compared with
multi-TI FAIR, the SAMURAI technique provided equally reliable ASL and T1
quantification results (ICC: 0.875-0.958) with excellent scan-rescan
repeatability (ICC: 0.905-0.992) (Fig 5) and significantly reduced scan time (45’
vs 4’6’’ for 9 TIs).Discussion and Conclusion
This
study proposed the SAMURAI technique for simultaneous acquisition of RBF, aBAT,
tBAT and T1 map in kidney with reliable ASL and T1 quantification, excellent
repeatability and significantly reduced scan time compared to traditional
techniques. Acknowledgements
None.References
1.
Wolf
M, de Boer A, Sharma K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging T1- and T2-mapping to
assess renal structure and function: a systematic review and statement paper.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(suppl_2):ii41-ii50.
2.
Zhang
JL, Lee VS. Renal perfusion imaging by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging.
2020;52(2):369-79.
3.
Wong
EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single
subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn Reson Med. 1998;39(5):702-8.
4.
Kim
SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive
alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping.
Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(3):293-301.
5.
Klein
S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. elastix: a toolbox for
intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(1):196-205.
6.
Huizinga
W, Poot DH, Guyader JM, et al. PCA-based groupwise image registration for
quantitative MRI. Med Image Anal. 2016;29:65-78.
7.
Buxton
RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model
for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med.
1998;40(3):383-96.