Qingjia Bao1, Piqiang Li2, Zhao Li1, Kewen Liu2, Chongxin Bai2, Peng Sun3, Jiazheng Wang3, Jie Wang1, Feng Pan1, Weida Xie2, Lian Yang4, and Chaoyang Liu1
1State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Phys, Wuhan, China, 2Wuhan University of Technology School of Information Engineering, Wuhan, China, 3Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China, 4Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Synopsis
We proposed a spectrum-to-spectrum/spectrum-to-phase
phase correction method based on a neural network for magnetic resonance spectra.
The former network obtains phase-corrected spectra by the end-to-end training the
mapping between the manually corrected spectra and uncorrected spectra. And the
latter can achieve more accurate phase correction by predicting the zero- and
first-order phases for correction. The result shows that the proposed network
can effectively obtain high-quality phase correction spectra even under noisy
and baseline distortion conditions.
INTRODUCTION
Spectroscopic
research plays an important role in both NMR and MRI fields. NMR Spectroscopy is
widely used in life sciences, drug treatments, petroleum, and petroleum1.
And in vivo MRS allows noninvasive analysis of metabolites and can provide
information on pathogenesis, monitoring metabolite responses, and clinical
diagnosis of cancers. MR Spectroscopy is mainly
presented in its absorption mode, which has advantages over amplitude mode or
power mode in terms of higher resolution and more accurate quantitative
information about spin concentration2. However, the spectrum after fourier
transform is not always absorbed for many reasons, including the misalignment
of the reference phase relative to the receiver phase detector, amplifier dead
time, and phase shift of digital filters used to reduce noise3.
Therefore, phasing the spectrum is one of the necessary procedures for the
post-processing of Spectroscopy. Although manual phase correction can obtain a
generally satisfying result by carefully tuning the Ph0 and Ph1, it is very
time-consuming, especially in the batch processing of NMR spectra. Moreover, in vivo MRS subject motion
often leads to changes in the quality of water suppression and excitation
of subcutaneous lipid signals, resulting in artifacts4.
Many automatic phase correction methods have been published over the
years5,6. The search-based phase correction algorithms are
developing towards increasing constraints and finer steps. Still, these
algorithms have some defects in some aspects, such as dependence on linearity5,
sensitivity to signal-to-noise ratio, and baseline distortion7. Moreover,
these methods often have poor correction effects for spectra with complex peak
shapes and baseline changes, such as metabolomics spectra4. We fuse
traditional methods and neural network to propose a more robust and
accurate method based on predicted Ph0 and Ph1.
This method significantly improves performance, which is very close to the
level of manual correction, and it is also resistant to interference factors
such as baseline distortion and noise.METHODS
The architecture
of the spectra-to-spectra/spectrum-to-phase correction method is shown in
Figure 1.
1) The spectrum-to-spectrum correction
method constructs a CNN to train the end-to-end mapping using the manually
corrected spectrum as the ground truth and the uncorrected spectrum as the
input. The network adopts an Unet-like encoder-decoder structure. The structure
consists of an encoder to obtain fine-grained multi-scale features by down-sampling
and then a decoder to gradually restore the feature details at different
scales. The skip connections retain the feature details lost in the
down-sampling process. The main process is shown in Figure 1 (a). The overall architecture
of Unet includes down-sampling, up-sampling, and jump connection. The red,
green, and orange arrows indicate downsampling, upsampling, and jump
connection, respectively.
2) The architecture of the
spectral-to-phase correction network is shown in Figure 1(b), and the design
idea is derived from ResNet. The overall model consists of an initial
one-dimensional convolutional layer, four residual blocks and the last two
one-dimensional convolutional layers. The first convolutional layer obtains
enough local information through a large perceptual field, then uses multiple
residual blocks stacked to obtain information of different layers to enhance
feature extraction, and finally uses the real part of the output and the ground
truth to calculate the loss.
We used a variety of metabolomics data to
test the spectrum to spectrum algorithm. Datasets include supernatants of
different brain tissue extracts from rats (hereafter referred to as rat brain
tissue) and mouse urine collected using a Bruker wave spectrometer. The number
of rat brain tissue data is 308, and the original number of sampling points is
8K (8*1024), which is later supplemented to 32K after zero-filling and other
operations. 70% of our training is used as the training set, 20% as the validation
set, and 10% as the test set. The number of mouse urine data is 470, the
original number of sampling points is 8K, and then it is supplemented to 32K
after filling zeros and other operations, and the same 70%, 20%, and 10% are
divided into training and validation test sets. The true values of all data
were manually corrected by experienced operators.RESULTS
Figure 2 shows
the comparison of the spectrum-to-spectrum method and the spectrum-to-phase
method. The Figure illustrates that the proposed spectrum-to-phase method can
achieve more accurate results, particularly from the difference spectrum.
Figure 3 shows the
comparison of the proposed spectrum-to-phase method and other methods (Topspin
software and CFTC, a baseline correction algorithm with coarse and fine tuning4).
It indicates the spectrum-to-phase method achieve better performance.
In order to
examine the effect of baseline distortion and noise on the algorithm, we
simulated a series of baseline distortion data and noisy spectral data to test
the robustness of the spectral-to-phase algorithm.
Figure 4 and 5 demonstrate
the robustness of the spectrum-to-phase approach in the face of baseline
distortion and noise. The results indicate the proposed method can accurately
predict the zero- and first-order phases with baseline distortion and noise
amplitudes.DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
A novel
deep learning network (spectral-to-phase method) was proposed for phase
correction from magnetic resonance spectrum. The proposed network could achieve
phase correction by predicting Ph0 and Ph1. Besides, the
method has high robustness. The proposed spectral-to-phase method offered a
promising deep learning framework for phase correction benefit from its high
quality and high robustness.Acknowledgements
We
gratefully acknowledge the financial support by National Major Scientific
Research Equipment Development Project of China (81627901), the National key of
R&D Program of China (Grant 2018YFC0115000, 2016YFC1304702), National
Natural Science Foundation of China (11575287, 11705274), and the Chinese
Academy of Sciences (YZ201677).References
1. Price W S . Spin dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Second
Edition[J]. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A, 2009, 34A(1): 60-61.
2. Vining B A, Bossio R E, Marshall A G. Phase correction for collision
model analysis and enhanced resolving power of fourier transform ion
cyclotron resonance mass spectra[J]. Analytical chemistry, 1999, 71(2):
460-467.
3. Daubenfeld J M, Boubel J C, Delpuech J J, et al. Automatic intensity,
phase, and baseline corrections in quantitative carbon-13
spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 1985, 62(2):
195-208.
4. Bao Q, Feng J, Chen L, et al. A robust automatic phase correction method
for signal dense spectra[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2013, 234:
82-89.
5. Heuer A. A new algorithm for automatic
phase correction by symmetrizing lines[J]. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance, 1991, 91(2): 241-253.
6. Balacco G, Cobas C. Automatic phase
correction of 2D NMR spectra by a whitening method[J]. Magnetic
Resonance in Chemistry, 2009, 47(4): 322-327.
7. Balacco G. A new criterion for
automatic phase correction of high-resolution NMR-spectra which does not
require isolated or symmetrical lines[J]. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance, Series A, 1994, 110(1): 19-25.