Ting Liang1, Xianjun Li1, and Jian Yang1
1Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Synopsis
Preoperative accurate differential diagnosis of
benign and malignant breast tumors is very important to avoid unnecessary
surgical treatment. This study aims to evaluate the potential efficacy of the virtual
elastography (vMRE) method in the differential diagnosis of IDC and FA, and help guide clinical management. Our results suggested that mean
virtual stiffness obtained by this vMRE method can accurately distinguish the
hardness difference between FA and IDC.
Introduction
Breast
invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and fibroma (FA) sometimes have similar imaging
findings and are difficult to distinguish. It is widely that the hardness of
breast tumor depends on the degree of proliferation of myofibroblasts (MFS).
Invasive ductal carcinoma and fibroma show different hardness. Magnetic
resonance elastography relies on the propagation of mechanically induced shear waves[1].
However, the
method lacks in image resolution and this may limit the visibility of small
tumors and focal regions of increased tissue stiffness in larger tumors. Also, the
method relies on additional hardware for induction of breast vibrations. Thus,
a novel and non-invasive method that relies on a clinically available MRI
sequences with high speed and image resolution, this so called virtual
elastography (vMRE) has an intrinsically high sensitivity to the viscoelastic
property of the tissue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the
potential efficacy of the vMRE method in the differential diagnosis of IDC and FA. Methods
The study was
approved by the Ethics Committee and informed consents were obtained from all
participants. Fifty-seven patients with suspected breast tumors underwent the
vMRE-method. All the MRI examinations were performed on a 3.0T MRI scanner
(Signa HDXT, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA) with a 16-channel breast coil. The
vMRE-method were acquired by EPI echosequence (TR/TE, 7800ms/82ms; FA, 15; slice
thickness, 4mm; FOV, 320mm; matrix, 128×128;b= 10、20、30、40、50、80、100、150、200、500、800、1000、2000s/mm2).
Data analysis The ADC value was
performed using the mean signal intensity based on the regions of interest
(ROIs). vMRE-images, reflecting tissue stiffness were reconstructed. From these
images, the mean virtual stiffness values over the tumor body were extracted; Diffusion
weighted images of the lower b-value (Slow, b value = 200 s/mm2)
and those of the higher b-value (Shigh, b value = 1000 s/mm2)
were used to estimate the virtual shear stiffness [2,3]: virtual shear
stiffness = a·ln
(Slow/Shigh) + b. The scaling (a) and the shift (b)
factors were separately set to −9.8 and 14 according to the previous
calibration studies [2,3]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic
curves (AUCs) of the mean virtual stiffness and ADC value were further compared
by non-parametric test.Results
The 57 patients (17 fibroadenoma, mean age of
38.6 years old, range 23~55 years; 39 IDC, mean age of 44.1 years old, range 29~62
years) were finally recruited in this study. No significant differences were
observed between fibroadenoma and IDC groups in terms of mean tumor’s maximal
diameter, and lesion location. The vMRE value between the two groups was
statistically significant (p<0.001), the cut-off
value was 5.519. The AUC of mean virtual stiffness value was 0.955, and it was similar
to the AUC of ADC value (0.961). Discussion
Intravoxel
incoherent motion MR imaging, through a calibration of sADC200–1000
with standard MR elastography, can be converted quantitatively into shear
modulus without using mechanical vibrations to provide information on the
degree of breast issue; these virtual elastograms require only two b values to
be acquired and processed [2]. This study demonstrated that the vMRE-method has
the potential to improve the differential diagnosis of IDC and FA due to IDC has
a higher degree of myofibroblast proliferation. Previous study indicated that evaluation
of pituitary adenomas consistency in preparation for surgery seems to be
feasible using the vMRE-method [3]. Non-Gaussian diffusion is believed to arise
from diffusion barriers, such as cell membranes in fibrotic tissue. Hence, vMRE
method could potentially provide a better understanding of microstructural
tissue changes in breast associated with disease pathology and enable fast and
detailed evaluation of the tumor stiffness. Conclusion
Diffusion and
intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-based virtual elastography has more
diagnostic performance than DWI assessment in distinguishing IDC from FA, which
could be widely used in clinical routine practice.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Shanxi National Science Foundation (2020JQ-518)References
[1]. Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, et
al. Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance
elastography[J]. NMR Biomed, 2008, 21(3):265–271.
[2]. Le Bihan D, Ichikawa S, Motosugi U.
Diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging–based virtual
elastography: a hypothesis-generating study in the liver[J]. Radiology, 2017,
285(2): 609-619.
[3]. Lagerstrand K , Gaedes N ,
Eriksson S , et al. Virtual magnetic resonance elastography has the
feasibility to evaluate preoperative pituitary adenoma consistency[J].
Pituitary, 2021,24(4):530-541.