Hui Zhang1, Chengyan Wang2, Peng Wu3, Huazheng Shi4, Weibo Chen3, and He Wang1
1Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 3Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 4Shanghai Universal cloud imaging dignostic center, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) is a widely used tool for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC). However, clinical routine liver DWI suffers from poor spatial
resolution, severe geometry distortion, and image blurring since single-shot (SSH)
echo-planar imaging (EPI) is used. Here we proposed an efficient solution for
clinical high-resolution whole-liver DWI. The efficacy and generalization capability of the method were validated on
healthy volunteers and HCC patients.
INTRODUCTION
Diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) is a widely applied method for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) due to its sensitivity to microscopic motion from either the water molecular
Brownian motion or the blood microcirculation in biologic tissue1. However,
clinical routine liver DWI suffers from poor spatial resolution, severe
geometry distortion, and image blurring since single-shot (SSH) EPI is used,
especially in locations with high field inhomogeneity2. The study of
high-resolution DWI is rarely reported so far due to lots of challenges (such
as motion control, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement). However, one
comparative study was done on the liver with multi-shot echo-planar imaging (MSH-EPI)
and SSH-EPI DWI, which chose conventional MUSE with only 2-shot and without any
improvements on MSH-EPI clinical applications3. Hence, we proposed
an efficient high-resolution DWI based on modified MUSE and validated the
solution on 25 healthy volunteers and 5 HCC patients.METHODS
Sequence
optimization: All MRI experiments were performed on a Philips 3.0 T clinical scanner
(Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). The
liver images were acquired from 25 healthy volunteers and 5 patients with
lesions using a 32-channel SENSE Torso/Cardiac coil with a modified respiratory
triggered multi-shot EPI DWI sequence, as shown in Figure 1. The optimizations
included: a) SNR improved: To achieve minimum TE values, the total b values
were assigned in multiple directions simultaneously to shorten the EPI
acquisition window. The duration of diffusion gradients was compressed by using
the maximum gradient strength as well as the slew rate multi-directions. b)
Respiratory motion control: Free-breathing respiratory triggered scans with abdominal
respiration and optimized trigger delay were recorded for image reconstruction. This helps to restrain the respiratory and cardiac
motions with enough time to collect multi-shot EPI DWI data with multiple
b-values. This helps to further correct phase
variations among different shots. By this means, the accuracy of inter-shot
phase calculation can be improved for further image analysis.
Data
acquisition: Four
kinds of liver DWI protocols were acquired, covering the whole liver for 30
healthy volunteers and patients with different somatotypes. The detailed
parameters are listed in Table 1. SSH-EPI and MSH-EPI DWI sequences (modified iEPI
sequence without navigator echo) were scanned with 20 slices without slice gap.
The in-plane resolution was 1.8×2 mm2 for MSH-EPI sequences and 3×3
mm2 for SSH-EPI sequences. Three b-values (for healthy volunteers: 0, 450 and 600 s/mm2;
for patients: 0, 600 and 800 s/mm2) were chosen for MSH-EPI and
SSH-EPI DWI. For MSH-EPI DWI, the full k-space was sampled by 4
independent shots. SSH-EPI DWI with the same echo train length (ETL) and TE were
also acquired as a reference. All those images were acquired with half-scan
factor of 0.712. Except considering the proper protocol for different subjects
with different somatotypes, we also validate our method's robustness with
different scan parameters (ETL and resolutions). As shown in Table 1, for thin
subjects, SSH and MSH-EPI were acquired using scan#1 and scan#2, sharing the same ETL for comparison.
For fatter subjects, data were acquired using scan#3 and scan#4. In addition, conventional
T2-weighted images with a resolution of 1.6×1.6×6.0 mm3 using
breath-hold were collected to provide anatomical information. Besides, the SNR
of high-resolution images reconstructed by two methods was labeled in the
bottom right corner, using the whole abdomen as the ROI for SNR calculation.RESULTS
As shown in Figure 2, the results showed that our method was capable of providing
high-resolution MSH-EPI DWI images with higher SNR (labeled in Figure 2 right
corner) than the conventional regularized SENSE method and SSH-EPI DWI images. The
image quality improvements for DWI were obvious with less signal loss (pointed by
yellow arrows) and residual artifacts (labeled with red arrows), especially in
those central regions of the images, where g-factor artifacts were
severe. As depicted in Figure 3 for the results of HCC patients, the proposed
method could provide the information about liver tissue with less signal loss
in the central region of the liver (pointed by yellow arrows) and achieve more
acceptable lesions delineation (indicated by red arrows) compared to the
SSH-EPI and conventional MSH-EPI reconstruction algorithm. Besides, the
experiments on volunteers and patients demonstrated the generalizability of our
proposed method preliminarily. CONCLUSION
A
whole-liver high-resolution solution, which helps improve image quality significantly,
has been proposed. The results from healthy volunteers and patients with lesions demonstrated
the feasibility and generalization performances of our method for
high-resolution MSH-EPI DWI, which might be used for routine clinical applications
as well as abdominal research.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81971583), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1312900), Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No. 20ZR1406400), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No.2017SHZDZX01, No.2018SHZDZX01) and ZJLab.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lebihan D, et al. Radiology
1988; 168:497.
2. Hui Z, et al. Neuroimage. 2021; 244: 118632.
3. Kim, Y. Y, et al. Eur J
Radiol. 2020; 132:109292