Cao Peng1, Zuojun Wang1, Chenyang Liu2, Tian Li2, Edward S. Hui3, and Jing Cai2
11. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 23. Department of Health Technology & Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 3The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Synopsis
We developed a motion-resolved
and free-breathing liver magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) protocol. The
deformation maps were obtained from the first singular image of MRF data. The
reconstruction method enforced the consistency of the MRF data with the
deformation maps by adding the deformation maps to the encoding matrix. MRF was
tested on four healthy volunteers. We demonstrated a motion-resolved MRF with a
nominal frame rate of 2.5 Hz for free-breathing liver imaging.
Introduction
Recently, rigid and non-rigid motion correction
methods have been used in MRF reconstruction to reduce motion artifacts in
brain, liver, and heart MRF experiments (1–4). The previous abdominal MRF studies were mostly breath-hold
based (5,6). Our recent study
showed the feasibility of free-breathing liver MRF in normal volunteers (7). However, no study performed free-breathing liver MRF in a 13-seconds/slice
speed with motion-resolved reconstruction. In this study, we proposed to apply non-rigid
image registration to complete the time series at each time frame for the
motion-resolved MRF reconstruction. Methods
The local institutional research ethics committee
approved the in vivo experiments. The MRF scan was performed on a GE 3T system
(GE Healthcare). A 50-channel “AIR” coil was used for the signal reception. A
FIDALL sequence was used for the MRF scan with parameters: a “half-sine”-style variable
flip angle, 1000 dynamics, spiral out readout, 2D FISP acquisition, constant TE
= 1.77 ms, repetition time (TR) varied from 13-16 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm, matrix size = 256 × 256, field of
view 300 × 300 mm2, number of TRs = 1000, number of total spiral
interleaves = 377, uniform rotation of spiral (360⁰/377), and scan time = 13
s/slice. In last 4D MRF scan, the parameters were slice thickness = 7 mm, slice
spacing = 2 mm, number of slices = 20, and scan time = 4 min 18 sec. The
following ranges were used for dictionary generation and dictionary matching:
10.2 < T1 < 4000 ms and 1.1 < T2 < 2000 ms.
The sensitivity maps were
compressed to 12 singular value components with a threshold at 20% of the largest
singular value. The k-space data and dictionary were also compressed into five
singular value components, using a threshold at 5% of the largest singular
value measured on the dictionary elements. Finally, the reconstruction was performed
using gradient descent in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick).
Gradient descent for reconstruction
The cost function for MRF reconstruction is given as$$L(x^*) = ||WFSMUx^*-WUy^*||_2^2+R(x^*) $$
where x* “virtually complete” singular images, i.e.,
MRF time series at each time frame after compression, y* singular
k-space data after compression, R regularization, S the
coil sensitivity profiles, F non-uniform Fourier transform (NUFFT), W the
undersampling mask with sliding window operator, U first k singular vectors of dictionary
for data compression (we set k =5 in this study), and M the
transpose of motion correction operator as shown in Figure 1. Minimizing the L(x*) allows the reconstruction of the MRF image
series. Two L1-wavelet constraints apply to spatial and temporal features of singular
images. This regularization is similar to the one used in CINE MRF
reconstruction (4). Results
The motion correction method is illustrated in Figure
1. The MRF raw time series were segmented into 33 time frames and compressed
into singular values. Figure 1b shows the results from the proposed motion
correction method. Figure 1c demonstrates the accuracy of the motion correction
on the dynamic MRF singular images. The NRMSE was 0.19 for measuring the
difference between the reference singular image and singular image after motion
correction. In Figure 2, the proposed method was robust enough to extract the pixel-wise
movement patterns for all liver MRF scans with 0.39 s/frame resolution. Figures 3 shows images for five time frames from
coronal, sagittal, and axial scans. The T1 and T2 maps showed comparable image
quality in those time frames. Figure 4 shows the T1 and T2 maps from the other two
volunteers, i.e., V2 and V3, using the sagittal scan. The SSIM of T1 and T2 maps from the proposed
method were 0.61 and 0.75, respectively. The NRMSE for T1 and T2 maps (without
considering vessel pixels) from the proposed method were 0.14 and 0.16,
respectively. Figure 5 shows the preliminary 4D MRF scan on a volunteer, V4. Discussion
This study demonstrated a motion-resolved and
free-breathing MRF with a 0.39-s/frame nominal resolution, i.e., 2.56 Hz for the
nominal frame rate. The deformation maps were obtained from the MRF singular
image. The iterative reconstruction method enforced the consistency of the MRF
data with the deformation maps. Compared with the previous study on non-rigid
motion correction for MRF that provided the motion-reduced images for one respiratory
phase (3),
the proposed one allowed the joint reconstruction of all time frames and
provided the dynamic motion pattern of T1 and T2 maps. Conclusion
We demonstrated a motion-resolved and free-breathing
MRF for liver imaging applications. Acknowledgements
The work was partly funded by the Hong Kong GRF fund (15102219) and the Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund (07182706, 06332916).References
1. Cruz G, Jaubert O, Schneider T, Botnar RM, Prieto
C. Rigid motion-corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:947–961
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27448.
2. Xu Z, Ye H, Lyu M, et
al. Rigid motion correction for magnetic resonance fingerprinting with
sliding-window reconstruction and image registration. Magn. Reson. Imaging
2019;57:303–312 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.001.
3. Gastao Cruz, Olivier
Jaubert, Haikun Qi, Torben Schneider, René M. Botnar and CP. Generalised Low-Rank Non-rigid Motion
Corrected reconstruction for 3D free breathing Liver Magnetic Resonance
Fingerprinting. In: ISMRM 2020. Paris; 2020. p. 3737.
4. Hamilton JI, Jiang Y,
Chen Y, et al. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1, T2,
and proton spin density. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;77:C1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26668.
5. Jaubert O, Arrieta C,
Cruz G, et al. Multi-parametric liver tissue characterization using MR
fingerprinting: Simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction mapping. Magn.
Reson. Med. 2020;84:2625–2635 doi: 10.1002/mrm.28311.
6. Chen Y, Jiang Y, Pahwa
S, et al. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantitative abdominal imaging. Radiology
2016;279:278–286 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152037.
7. Li T, Cui D, Hui ES,
Cai J. Time-resolved magnetic resonance fingerprinting for radiotherapy motion
management. Med. Phys. 2020;47:6286–6293 doi: 10.1002/mp.14513.