Daichi Murayama1, Takayuki Sakai1, Masami Yoneyama2, Jihun Kwon2, and Shigehiro Ochi1
1Department of Radiology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan, 2Philips Japan, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
TOF-MRA sometimes cannot delineate the vessel clearly depending on the vessel orientation. Additionally, insufficient fat suppression can occur in FS-T1-VISTA, it may obscure the plaque depiction. we have developed a new sequence, termed Phase-contrast ANgiography with Dark-blood Application (PANDA), which can simultaneously acquire bright-blood image (MRA) and vessel-wall images (VWI) using the phase contrast method. There was no difference in the visualization ability of carotid plaque between PANDA-VWI and FS T1 VISTA. PANDA-MRA better visualized around the aorta compared to TOF-MRA. PANDA is useful method for simultaneous acquisition of MRA and VWI images.
Purpose
The current standard methods for carotid plaque assessment are time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and fat-suppressed T1-weighted 3D Turbo Spin-Echo (FS-T1-VISTA).1,2) However, TOF-MRA sometimes cannot delineate the vessel clearly depending on the vessel orientation. Additionally, insufficient fat suppression can occur in FS-T1-VISTA, it may obscure the plaque depiction. To overcome these problems of current techniques, we have developed a new sequence, termed Phase-contrast ANgiography with Dark-blood Application (PANDA), which can simultaneously acquire bright-blood image (MRA) and vessel-wall images (VWI) using the phase contrast method. [Fig.1] In this study, we investigated the usefulness of PANDA, simultaneous acquisition of MRA and VWI images, to improve the carotid plaque assessment.Methods
All subjects were examined with a 3.0T whole-body clinical system (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare). MRA (PANDA-MRA) was created from the phase image, and VWI (PANDA-VWI) was created by subtracting the phase image from the magnitude image. [Fig.2] We performed conventional methods (TOF-MRA and FS-T1-VISTA) and PANDA imaging in ten patients who had a carotid plaque in follow-up examination. To quantitatively evaluate carotid plaque visualization, we computed Contrast Ratio (CR) between the plaque and sternocleidomastoid muscle for both FS-T1-VISTA and PANDA-VWI. Imaging parameters for FS-T1-VISTA were; Coronal, voxel size=1.0×1.0×1.0mm3, FOV=250×250mm2, 150 slices, fat suppression=SPAIR, TR=600ms, TE=11ms, SENSE factor=2 and total acquisition time=4min30s.
Imaging parameters for TOF-MRA were; Transverse, voxel
size=1.0×1.0×1.0mm3, FOV=200×200mm2, 220 slices, TR=23ms, TE=3.5ms, Flip Angle=20, SENSE factor=2.5 and total acquisition time=4min32s.
Imaging parameters for PANDA were; Coronal, voxel
size=1.0×1.0×1.6mm3, FOV=250×250mm2, 150 slices, fat suppression=SPAIR, TFE prepulse = saturate, TR=8ms, TE=2.6ms, Flip Angle=10, TFE factor=6, SENSE factor=4 and total acquisition time=4min-7min(HR50-100).
Results and Discussions
The CR of carotid plaque was not significantly different between PANDA-VWI and FS-T1-VISTA. [Fig.3] This suggests that there is no difference in the visualization ability of carotid plaque between PANDA-VWI and FS-T1-VISTA. In the clinical image, PANDA-MRA better visualized around the aorta compared to TOF-MRA. [Fig.4]Conclusion
PANDA improves the depiction of arteries especially around the aorta and is a useful method for simultaneous acquisition of MRA and VWI images.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Stroke. 2011; 42: 3132-3137
2) K inoue et al. EJR 2016; 85: 1035-1039