Xianghu Yan1, Lu Huang1, Lingping Ran1, Yi Luo1, Yuwei Bao1, Shuheng Zhang2, Shiyu Zhang2, Yongquan Ye3, Jian Xu3, and Liming Xia1
1Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 3UIH America, Inc., Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Cardiovascular
magnetic resonance (CMR) T2-weighted dark blood (T2W-DB) imaging has great diagnostic
value for detecting myocardial edema. In this study, a novel
deep learning based acceleration framework (AI-assisted Compressed Sensing,
ACS) was applied to a single-shot T2W-DB sequence for single breath-hold whole
heart (9 slices) imaging. Both quantitative and qualitative
assessment of the images suggested that the ACS T2-DB sequence offered better image
quality with greatly reduced total scan time and the simplified scanning
workflow.
Introduction
Conventional
2D dual inversion recovery (DIR) fast spin echo (FSE) sequence for cardiac
T2W-DB morphological imaging acquires k-space data in segments across multiple
cardiac cycles, which needs multiple breath holds. In clinical scenarios, irregular
heart rate and breath holding difference tend to induce motion artifact. By
incorporating an Artificial Intelligence (AI) module based on deep learning
neural network for information recovery and artifact suppression 1, compressed
sensing (CS) can achieve higher acceleration factor than parallel imaging while
ensuring consistent image quality. In
this study, a novel AI-assisted compressed sensing (ACS)
2 acceleration strategy was applied to the single-shot
T2W-DB sequence. In addition, because long echo trains are required for
single-shot acquisition, the variable flip angle
strategy designed according to the myocardial T1 and T2 relaxation times is
used for suppressing myocardial inhomogeneity and blurs. The purpose of this
study was to investigate the clinical feasibility of the ACS single-shot T2W-DB
sequence compared to conventional T2W-DB through quantitative and qualitative
image assessment.Methods
Subjects:
28 patients (21 males, 43±15 years) and 5 healthy volunteers (5 males, 29±4
years) were prospectively recruited with informed consent obtained in this
study. Clinical indications included ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy,
cardiac valve disease, myocarditis, and other diseases that were not classified.
MRI scan: Cardiac Magnetic
Resonance imaging (CMR) was performed on a 3.0-Tesla scanner (uMR790, United
Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China), equipped with 12×2-channel cardiac coil.
Conventional T2W-DB and single-shot ACS T2W-DB sequences were applied for heart
imaging in short-axis view. The details of imaging parameters are shown in Table 1.
Image analysis: All
imaging datasets were evaluated by Dicom format. The overall image quality and
blood pool suppression were assessed by two cardiovascular radiologists using a
5-point scale of Likert score (1 = non-diagnostic, 2 = poor, 3 = satisfactory,
4 = good, 5 =excellent) independently. The visual quality of free wall of right
ventricle (RV), free wall of left ventricle (LV) and interventricular septum
were evaluated. Interventricular septum ROI and blood
pool ROI were manually drawn by two radiographers on the
middle slice of the heart, as Figure1 shows.
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were then
determined as follows:
$$SNR=\frac{Mean_{myocardium}}{SD_{myocardium}}$$
$$CNR=\frac{Mean_{myocardium}-Mean_{bloodpool}}{SD_{bloodpool}}$$
Sharpness
Measurement: Image sharpness was measured by calculating the ratio of major
frequency components in frequency domain 3.
Statistical analysis: Statistical
analysis was performed using SPSS (version 23.0, Chicago, IL). The two observer
Likert scores and all measurements were averaged prior to analysis, the measurement
data and grade data between the conventional T2W-DB and the single-shot T2W-DB
with ACS were assessed using paired wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired
t-test, respectively. Kendall's W was used to assess inter-observer agreement
of scoring data. ICC was used to assess inter-observer agreement of continual
data. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results
Compared
to conventional T2W-DB, the acquisition time of single-shot
ACS T2-DB was significantly reduced (87.5±16.3s vs 17.0±3.1s, p<0.001). Single-shot
ACS T2-DB yielded significant higher SNR, CNR and sharpness (p<0.05 for all) than conventional T2-DB, while both
methods showed no significant difference on overall image quality, RV and LV
wall visibility as well as septal wall visibility (p> 0.05 for all). In
terms of dark blood effect, single-shot ACS T2-DB was determined to have better
performance than conventional T2-DB. The scores of the two cardiovascular
radiologists and the results measured by the two radiographers were in good
agreement (Table 2). Quantitative analysis and qualitative scoring data are
shown in Table 3. The whole-heart images comparison of conventional
T2-DB and single-shot ACS T2-DB are shown in
Figure 2.Conclusion
Recently,
deep learning-based acceleration methods with high acceleration factor have exhibited
great potentials in MR imaging, however, few have been employed for CMR T2W-DB
imaging. In this study, the single-shot
ACS T2W-DB sequence acquires k-space data of one slice during one cardiac
cycle, significantly reducing patient burden caused by repeated breath holding and the motion artifacts induced
by irregular heart rate.
The whole heart coverage (9 slices) T2W-DB imaging is
completed within a single breath-hold, offering high quality images with greatly shortened acquisition time and
simplified scanning workflow. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Knoll
F, Murrell T, Sriram A, et al. Advancing machine learning for MR image
reconstruction with an open competition: Overview of the 2019 fastMRI challenge.
Magn Reson Med. 2020;(January):mrm.28338.
2.Renkuan
Zhai, et al. Intelligent Incorporation of AI with Model Constraints for MRI
Acceleration. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2021): 1760
3.De
K, Masilamani V. Image Sharpness Measure for Blurred Images in Frequency
Domain[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 64:149-158