Travis Salzillo1, Alex Dresner2, Brigid McDonald1, Ashley Way1, Sara Ahmed 1, Lauren Andring1, Kelsey Corrigan1, Gohar Manzar1, Alison Yoder1, Abdallah Mohamed1, Chelsea Pinnix1, Jason Stafford3, Jihong Wang4, and Clifton Fuller1
1Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 2Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands, 3Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 4Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
In order to improve head and neck radiotherapy treatment planning, a series of 3D fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences were developed with varying pulse sequence parameters. One non-fat-suppressed and five fat-suppressed sequences were acquired on five patients, and on each image, four structures were segmented by six radiation oncology physicians (observers). Robust and comprehensive analysis was performed to assess qualitative and quantitative image quality metrics. This included geometric distortion, SNR and CNR measurements, structure conspicuity, interobserver segmentation variability, and qualitative image quality rankings. The results of these were used to determine the optimal fat-suppressed sequence for head and neck radiation treatment planning.
Introduction
The use of MRI in radiation treatment planning has
drastically increased over the last several years1.
This is due to the superior soft tissue contrast produced by MRI compared to CT,
which has conventionally been used in treatment planning. For MR images to be clinically
useful for treatment planning, they must possess minimal distortion, high
resolution in three dimensions, and high contrast-to-noise (CNR) in tumors and
organs-at-risk. While conventional 3D T2-weighted (T2w) MRI sequences have been
successfully implemented for treatment planning, head and neck tumors and
surrounding structures are often obscured by nearby hyperintense fat signal,
which can lead to inaccurate segmentation and suboptimal dose delivery (Fig. 1).
Therefore, we sought to develop a clinically feasible fat-suppressed T2
sequence acquired on MR-Simulation and MR-Linac devices. Furthermore, iterations
of this sequence were comprehensively analyzed to identify the optimal pulse
sequence parameters for final use in head and neck radiotherapy treatment
planning. Methods
From preliminary work that investigated basic Short-TI
Inversion Recovery (STIR), Spectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR), and Dixon
acquisitions on an MR-Linac device2,
the SPAIR technique was chosen for further development due to its compromise of
scan time and signal-to-noise (SNR). Several iterations of a 3D SPAIR T2w sequence
were developed by adjusting relevant pulse sequence parameters such as TR, TE,
refocusing angle, bandwidth, FID reduction, echo train length, and oversample factor.
After eliminating iterations which produced severe artifacts, poor fat suppression,
or poor SNR, five final 3D T2w SPAIR sequence iterations were chosen for further
analysis (Fig. 2). With appropriate informed consent and IRB approval, images
were acquired with these sequence iterations on five head and neck cancer
patients on an MR-Linac device.
The images acquired from these sequence iterations were
subjected to comprehensive and robust analysis. Overall geometric distortion
was assessed by registering the images to their corresponding T2 images,
autosegmenting the outline of the head and neck regions, and computing the Dice
similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Each of the images
were contoured by six independent radiation oncology physicians (observers).
Four structures were segmented: tumor GTV, suspicious lymph nodes, left/right
parotid glands, and left/right pterygoid muscles (Fig. 3). SNR and CNR measurements
(relative to muscle and fat) were performed on these segmentations. Furthermore,
the visibility of these structures was quantified through conspicuity
measurements (a metric combining contrast and surrounding signal complexity3),
which was automated through software developed through this project. The
ability of these sequences to allow for accurate and precise contouring was
assessed by performing interobserver variability analysis on the segmentations.
For each structure, DSC and HD were calculated pairwise between each observer for
a given image and averaged. Follow-up simultaneous truth and performance level
estimation (STAPLE) analysis was also performed to further assess interobserver
variability4.
Lastly, qualitative rankings for each image were provided by each of the observers
and two separate imaging physicists which encompassed presence of artifacts,
level of fat suppression, and clarity of structures. Results
The non-fat-suppressed 3D T2w image and five 3D T2w SPAIR
images were successfully acquired on each of the five patients. Segmentations
of the four structures (tumor GTV, suspicious lymph nodes, left/right parotid
glands, and left/right pterygoid muscles) were segmented by the observers.
These observers, along with two imaging physicists have provided qualitative
image quality rankings. In-house software was developed to automatically
extract signal values 2 pixels inside and outside each point of the segmentation
boundaries. The resultant conspicuity values per slice occupied by the
structure was calculated, and these values from one observer’s segmentations on
each image from one patient are plotted in Fig. 4. Of note, conspicuity of MR2 is
significantly high across all structures, MR3 and MR5 in normal structures, and
MR4 in malignant structures. In contrast, conspicuity of MR1 (non-fat-suppressed
3D T2w) and MR6 are consistently low in all structures. Conspicuity
measurements from the remaining observers and remaining patients will be
presented, along with the results of geometric distortion, SNR and CNR
measurements, qualitative image quality rankings, and interobserver variability
analysis. Discussion and Conclusion
Deliverables from this project are two-fold. First, an
optimized 3D T2w SPAIR sequence has been developed and validated for acquisition
on MR-Linac devices for head and neck radiotherapy treatment planning purposes.
Conspicuity measurements demonstrate that all measured structures are less
visible in the non-fat-suppressed 3D T2w compared to its SPAIR counterparts. The
sequence will be shared amongst various other institutions with MR Simulators and
MR-Linacs as part of multi-institutional validation and standardization. Second,
a robust and comprehensive analysis platform for image acquisition optimization
has been developed. The combination of qualitative and quantitative metrics of
image quality and segmentation precision have been incorporated into an image
grade and can be applied to any type of imaging technique for optimization. The
culmination of these deliverables has led to improved radiation treatment planning
in head and neck cancer cases at our institution.Acknowledgements
Supported by The University of Texas Health Science Center at
Houston Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences TL1 Program (TL1
TR003169)References
1. K. M. Jones, K. A. Michel, J. A.
Bankson, C. D. Fuller, A. H. Klopp, and A. M. Venkatesan, “Emerging Magnetic
Resonance Imaging Technologies for Radiation Therapy Planning and Response
Assessment,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1046–1056,
Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.028.
2. F. Del Grande et al., “Fat-Suppression
Techniques for 3-T MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System,” RadioGraphics,
vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 217–233, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1148/rg.341135130.
3. G. Revesz, H. L. Kundel, and M. A.
Graber, “The Influence of Structured Noise on the Detection of Radiologic
Abnormalities,” Invest. Radiol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 479–486, Nov. 1974,
doi: 10.1097/00004424-197411000-00009.
4. S. K. Warfield, K. H. Zou, and W. M.
Wells, “Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE): An
Algorithm for the Validation of Image Segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med.
Imaging, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 903–921, Jul. 2004, doi:
10.1109/TMI.2004.828354.